Cosmological Revolution

Good Essays
Cosmological Revolution

There are three philosophers which contribute theories to the Cosmological Revolution. Each philosopher gives their own reasons as to their own theory and their explanations. These three philosophers are Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, and Imre Lakatos. I consider there to be valuable points in each of the philosopher’s theories.

Thomas Kuhn could possibly be the best known philosopher. I agree with many of Kuhn’s theories about the history of science. Kuhn had his PhD in physics and was a professor at MIT Institute. Kuhn was interested in how certain theories that were once held true could be replaced by new theories that were different but also held to be true. I find this very fascinating myself because once I find one thing to be true I don’t necessarily want to think something completely opposite can take its place but in the world we live in there are so many new things that we learn every day. These new things just change the way we look at other things. It’s so good to keep an open mind in this aspect because when we learn new things it opens our understanding on the world as we know it. Kuhn’s Structure of Revolution is a five step process. First is any everyday science, or paradigm. A paradigm is like a solution to a problem. Next step is the anomaly. The anomaly is a problem that can’t be solved. Then, the next step is the crisis, which new ideas and methods are started to try and crack the anomaly that couldn’t be solved previously. The fourth step is the paradigm shift. During the paradigm shift, a new approach becomes successful and works. The last step is when the paradigm is published into books so that other scientists can view the material and also come up with new paradigms. Kuhn’s steps are very important to scientific research and also to improve on other scientific paradigms to keep science progressing.

Another philosopher is Karl Popper. Popper was a philosophy professor at the London School of Economics. Popper



Bibliography: Kuhn, Thomas S. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Second ed. Vol. 1. Chicago: The University of Chicago Pres, 1962, 1970. 111-35. 2 vols. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Scientific Revolution Nicolas Copernicus 1473 - 1543 Tycho Brahe 1546-1601 Johannes Kepler 1571 -1630 Galileo Galilei 1564- 1642 Isaac Newton 1642- 1726 Nicolas Copernicus 1473 - 1543 Nicolas Copernicus Nicolas Copernicus wrote a brief statement which essentially said we live in a heliocentric solar system and that the sun is the center of everything. Against the church however the church didn't seem to care that Copernicus was announcing his belief. Because his statement was poorly written…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmological

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cosmological arguments Kalam cosmological argument The aim of this argument is to show that the universe had a beginning in the finite past. The argument battles against the existence of an infinite, temporal regress of past events which implies a universe that has infinitely existed. This argument implies the existence of a First Cause. The form of the argument is: 1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause. 2. The universe began to exist. 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause. Thomistic cosmological…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument as proof of God The Cosmological Argument is born out of premise that the world must have a cause and a reason for existing. The word ‘cosmos’ comes the Greek word meaning concerned with cause. The argument is posteriori in its nature, meaning it is based on thing we experience in the universe, and takes a probabilistic approach to try and decipher how said evidence came to being. In this essay I will focus on arguments from Aquinas, Leibniz and Frederick Copleston, whilst…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    has a theory of five ways to demonstrate God’s existence for natural reasons; these are the argument from motion, the cosmological argument, argument from necessity, the argument from gradation, and the teleological argument (Soccio, 2013, p. 230). “The argument from motion explains that motion must be given to each object by some other object that is already moving. The cosmological argument clarifies that there is a cause for everything created in this world. The argument from necessity is based…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument The cosmological argument is the argument that the existence of the world or universe is strong evidence for the existence of a God who created it. The existence of the universe, the argument claims, stands in need of explanation, and the only adequate explanation of its existence is that it was created by God. Like most arguments for the existence of God, the cosmological argument exists in several forms; two are discussed here: the temporal, kalam cosmological argument…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological argument

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Explain the strengths and weaknesses of Aquinas’ Cosmological argument The Cosmological argument attempts to explain that something has caused the universe to exist and this First cause is what we call God. The argument begins with observations that try to support the following statements: • Everything in the universe has a cause • The universe itself must have a cause • To avoid infinite regress of causes there must be an uncaused cause • This uncaused cause is God The argument uses inductive…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is the "Cosmological Argument" for God's existence? Be sure to make the premises and conclusion clear. Discuss what you take to be the strongest objection to this argument, and explain why you think it succeeds or fails. The cosmological argument for God’s existence differs from both the scriptural and ontological arguments in the way in which humans created it. Rather than looking at logical arguments or religious texts, the cosmological argument was derived because of humanity’s ability…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Who is considered the author of the Ontological argument? ANS: Saint Anslem 2. The first 3 “Ways” by St. Thomas Aquinas (to prove the existence of God) are called: a. argument from design b. argument from perfection c. cosmological argument d. none of the above. ANS: Cosmological argument 3. Explain the thrid way by Aquinas...which is called the argument from contigency. (2 or 3 sentences) ANS: Contingency can be explained as the possibility of things that come into being and go out of being.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Arguments for the Existence of God Out of the four arguments for the existence of a God, the Cosmological argument is the most persuasive. For thousands of years, humans have wondered what their purpose on Earth is and how we came to exist. Because of this wondering, many humans have concluded that there is an all-powerful creator who created the universe and everything in it. But, since we cannot see this creator and have no evidence as proof of his existence, there are many people who doubt…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Arguement

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The cosmological argument is a collection of arguments for the existence of God, based on the fact of the world’s existence. It was first posited by famous Greek philosophers, Plato and Aristotle. They postulated the need for a craftsman for the universe and began their argument with the fact of motion. The basis of the argument state that the universe cannot cause itself…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays