Preview

Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1287 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God
The Cosmological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God. It is explained that everything has a reason, is the first reason, the first reason is of no significance. The cosmological view tries to prove the existence of God by observing the universe. Scientists believe that the universe must have a beginning, it needs something to give it existence. So that we can contact to God, God is always there, no reason, no beginning, no limit, beyond time, is infinite. Moreover, according to Aquinas, he also states five way for support the existence of God. For example, Unmoved Mover, First Cause, Contingency, Degrees of Perfection and Teleological. First of all, Unmoved Mover definition is there is nothing can be moved itself. …show more content…
he tries to say that God's existence should be based on a priori of knowledge, because the existence of God itself can be defined by personal experience ( even though personal experience and experience cannot be tested). he gives example, when an individual sees God, he cannot explain that it is true to others, and there is no way to prove that he really sees God. However, the definition of God can be defined by a priori experience, which means in the human mind, people can think God is exist in their mind. Then he believes the concept of God is generally considered to be the most greatest. In meditation, imagine that something is greatest but does not exist, and another is greatest and exists. The something that exist is certainly more greatest than something is not exist. Therefore, the same greatest thing can not exist only in thought; if it exists only thought, it can be assumed that it is exist in reality, and that Its existence is even more greatest than it is not exist. It can also be assumed that It is both exist in reality and in thought, that will be more greatest. God is greatest, and this has to appear that the exist of …show more content…
If the universe has never had a starting point, it means that the number of events in the history of the universe is infinite. But the number of past events must be limited. Therefore, the series of events in the past can not go back to the endless, the existence of the universe must have a beginning. Scientists have to face the origin of the universe, it will be inexplicable. So the existence of God is inevitable. Even though a supporter of the big bang theory, if he is an atheist, he must at least have to believe that the universe is out of nothing. But it must be unreasonable! Nothing can be made out of nothing. This will have to believe in the presence of God. This argument provides a belief in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    People use the Cosmological argument to claim that this uncaused cause has to be God and there is no other explanation that could change that the initial cause of the universe is God. According to William L. Rowe in “The Cosmological Argument”, the cosmological argument has several key elements that make the argument into one that is to be taken into…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are looking for evidence god exists, so we turned to an evidential argument in favor of God: the cosmological argument.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This argument has been subject to great applause through the religious community for its simplistic and impactful articulation. However the cosmological argument is also opposed by atheists who fail to find substance and empirical evidence within its core.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The concept that there cannot be nothing and so must be something is due to the evidence we as human beings have experienced throughout our lives; every effect ever made has had a cause. Aquinas used the laws of Motion and Design to demonstrate how every action must have a correlating reaction, and related this to his argument for God being the first cause – the uncaused causer. This is laid out in the Cosmological Argument, taken directly from the Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry;…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of the kalam cosmological argument, the distinction drawn between the universe and God is that the universe has a beginning in time. Everything that has a beginning in time, the kalam cosmological argument…

    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Saint Anselm and Gaunilo’s “The Ontological Argument”, Anselm believes that God is the greatest of all conceivable things and nothing else can be ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most common and influential argument’s for the existence of God are design arguments. In the last fifty years design arguments have received the most attention philosophically. Design arguments are both empirical and inductive arguments. Design arguments identify properties of objects in nature and argue that the only way that they could have occurred or the best explanation for them is that there is some intelligent/higher being that created or conceived the object. William Paley was a Christian apologist in the eighteenth century who was known for his popular version of the teleological argument (“watchmaker analogy”). Paley stressed the idea that the world’s complexity and design is not based off luck or chance, but rather designed by…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an all-perfect God is the ontological argument. While there are several different versions of the argument, all purport to show that it is self-contradictory to deny that there exists a greatest possible being. Thus, on this general line of argument, it is a necessary truth that such a being exists; and this being is the God of traditional Western theism. This article explains and evaluates classic and contemporary versions of the ontological argument.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle’s ideas and offered the ‘Five Ways’ which have the aim to prove the existence of God. Three of the five form the cosmological argument. The first way is motion, the second is cause and the third is necessity and contingency.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are 3 main arguments that each seek to prove the existence of God; the Ontological, Cosmological, and Teleological Arguments. Each is different in its approach, but all arrive at the same conclusion. Ontological Argument argues God’s existence from the assumption of the existence a “Greatest Thing that can ever be conceived.” From there, it argues that in order for something to be “The Greatest Thing ever” it must exist physically (that is outside of the mind). The Cosmological Argument argues that since everything in the universe is contingent (or is dependent on other things for its existence), there must be a first cause that set the universe in motion.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In The Cosmological Argument Premise 2 explains that everything cannot be a dependent living thing. William Rowe explains why the Principle of Sufficient reason is true, then premise 2 is also true. Rowe suggests that there has never been a self-existing living thing, but only an infinite series of dependent living things. In this case, every living thing has an explanation, because it is explained if a living thing that came before it then that caused its existence.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The argument for design has evolved over time as both theologians and philosophers have needed to adjust their arguments supporting this theory to address an ever changing landscape of scientific, biological and cosmological discovery. Despite this the essence of the argument remains intact those in support of the theory would argue that our existence on this earth and in this universe is far too complex a chain of events to have happened by chance. That in fact the existence of the universe is itself the result of a set of such improbable circumstances that there has to be intelligence behind its creation an architect, a creator or in religious terms a God (Chappell, 2011, p. 55). The versions of this argument are in my opinion interesting…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first cause argument takes the existence of the universe to entail the existence of a being that created it. It does so based on the fact that the universe had a beginning. There must, the first cause argument says, be something that caused that beginning, a first cause of the universe.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think this is a significant objection because it is very hard to prove that God did create the universe, because if he did, some people may question who or what first cause created him. Also, even though the Cosmological Argument states that there is a first cause for everything that exists, there is no way to prove that the first cause is omniscient, omnibenevolent, and omnipotent, this being said, because there is no way to prove that, the creator of the universe is omniscient, omnibenevolent, and omnipotent. If the creator of the universe is not omniscient, omnibenevolent, and omnipotent, the creator of the universe cannot be God. People also may question if it was an intelligent designer who created the universe. This is an example of Intelligent Design Creationism.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The cosmological argument proves the existence of God. It discusses contingent beings which exist, but could not have existed and necessary beings which exist and could not not exist. The cosmological says that there is a contingent being that exists. The existence of a contingent being must have a cause and the contingent being cannot be the cause of itself. The complete cause of a contingent being includes only other contingent beings or it includes a necessary being. Contingent beings alone cannot be the complete cause of a contingent being. The complete cause of a contingent being must include a necessary being. Therefore, a necessary being must exist. The cosmological argument shows that there must be a higher power, and that higher power is God. Everything that exists on earth is a contingent being. There is no person or animal that is not contingent. But what created everything to begin with if a contingent being cannot be the only cause of another contingent being? Everything on earth has a cause, but there must be a necessary being being that caused the Earth. There has to be something other than contingent beings. There has to be a necessary being that started everything. That necessary being is…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays