Others could be said that it was just as detrimental as it was to help. It did provide jobs, electricity, and water, but the consequences that come with it werent as evident as they are now. The now corralled water has disrupted the natural state of flow and now has dropped in oxygen levels, that affect the livelihood within its depths. Also since the water is being regularly filtered, the water is no longer carrying sediment, so the water is actually more likely to erode the walls of the river faster and more likely. As well as the naturally carved paths that it once flowed will be no longer preserved by the water now that it is being manipulated by the precise distribution to the varying 7 states. With the water distribution organisms are being shifted to new habitats, that are endangering their survival because of the consistency of new life is being introduced to new habitats, that most aren't compatible with. It was considered to be a clean source, but is it? While local tourism and population and economic values are striving from the Hoover Dam, the actual waters are suffering and the site for the things we enjoy today.
While the Hoover Dam is decades old, all the sources and things are not all completely known. For example, the effect on the environment is not surely recorded and known. When the site was changed so dramatically, no real sources were kept on how things were affected when it happened, or even recorded how things were before that. Thus, we cannot know if it was detrimental or not, to make an actual argument or investigation on the matter. While it can be seen now on what it affects, we can’t date it back to