Preview

Corporate Social Responsibility

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
641 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Corporate Social Responsibility
Tutorial 6 -- “The only role of business is the increase of profits”. Discuss.

Supporters of narrow view agree that the only role of business is the increase of profits. They believe that caring about the environmental, social and other problems should be the responsibility of government and non-profit making organizations sponsored by governments. (Pontinen J 2013 )

A bright supporter of the narrow view is Milton Friedman who claims that the only social responsibility a business has is to maximize the profits of its owner or shareholders. Friedman feels that as long as the corporate executive carries out these desires in a way that follows the laws and ethical customs of society, this person has fulfilled his or her duty for the society. Corporate executives are charged with earning and spending corporate money. If an executive chooses an agenda of social responsibility that is in direct conflict with the company’s agenda of profitability. They lack the nessary expertise to assign them non-economic responsibilities would be to place social welfare in the hands of inept custodians. Therefore, he only role of business is the increase of profits. (Pontinen J 2013 )

Another defender of narrow view in corporate social responsibility is famous economist Adam Smith, whose “invisible hand” argument states that if every member of society in a free market economy strives to promote his own economic interests they are led to promote the general good. Thus, corporations should not be held morally responsible for non-economic matters, to do so would distort the economic mission of business.( Dudovskiy 2012)

Conversely, the supporters of board view disagree that the only role of business is the increase of profits. The supporters of the broader view believe that profit is important but not means that the company does not has the duties or responsibility to the other. Businesses cannot make decisions which are made solely with economic point of view, because they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Friedman vs Freeman

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Milton Friedman’s first argument is that the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Managers must have fiduciary responsibility to the owners and the purspose of the business is not to provide employment, eliminate discrimination, avoid pollution, help the community or make life better for workers. Friedman thinks that business should not work as a charity, and should do anything other than making profit to promote socialism and undermine free society.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedman criticizes business managers who engage in socially responsible behavior by using the argument that there is a different set of criteria for social responsible behavior of a person, who happens to be a corporate executive (businessman) versus that same person acting as an individual in a free-society. A business manager’s main responsibility is to maximize the profit of the corporation. When that person combines those roles and directs a corporation to take on a social responsible cause, because it would either increase cost or decrease revenue, it would be equivalent to a tax on the customers, shareholders and employees without their consent and in some cases, knowledge.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Promoting a social justice may be justified, because it has been proven to create the competitive advantage by creating loyal employees, which directly leads to attaining loyal costumers. This may create an argument on flip side, that it may increase the administrative expenses which may also distracts the executive, as well as managers from their soul responsibility looking to increase the profits. This idea of profit maximization is well supported by the greatly Friedman, who particularly rejected the idea off business leaders articulating new visions that consider any business aspect than the profit maximizations them selves. The survey of corporate social responsibility research says, “ It creates administrative expenses, distracts executives, confuses economic goal, and subtracts from social welfare when the corporation is less efficient.” (The good company, 22)…

    • 2712 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    busad 250 exam1 review

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Role of Business in Society and potential positive and negative effects (Exhibit 4, p. 8)…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Friedman argues that "only people can have responsibilities" but that "businesses as a whole” cannot, as they are not persons. Since the corporate executive is an employee of the shareholders, and therefore only “responsible to his employers.” The corporate executive has primary responsibility to his employers to conduct business as they see fit, and manage the business to create the most profit while following the “basic rules of the society”. It is then seen that the corporate executive is acting as a “public employee,” while serving shareholders and should be directed by those shareholders how to spend their money.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There seems to be a common thread among anti-capitalists; the assumption that the decision-makers derived from successful capitalist ventures act solely in their own best interest. This idea, in itself, is irrational, as the success of business depends on the general public’s need for products and services.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Creating Shared Value

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The problem nowadays is that most businesses don’t have the right purpose ‘in mind’. They have a narrow-minded view in making profit and thus optimizing short-time financial performance. This old capitalistic view leads to a vicious circle. More specifically, the corporation doesn’t keep its environment and the broader community in mind while making profit and so they are perceived as (partly) responsible for society’ failures. This is where political leaders undermine competitiveness by setting the appropriate policies.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organizational Ethics

    • 3113 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Friedman, M. (1997[1970]). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In T.L. Beauchamp & N.E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 56-61). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 3113 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Corporations are only accountable to shareholders. They do not have social responsibilities. Before commencement on making my stand in this topic, a clear definition of the aspects of this topic is essential. Firstly, a corporation can be define as a legal entity or structure created under authority of the laws of a state, consisting of a person or group of persons who become shareholders (All business 2010). Also, a corporation has the right to sue and be sued, own and sell property, and enters into contracts using its name (Velasquez 2006). The next definition is to define shareholders. ‘The simplest definition of a shareholder seems straightforward enough: an individual, institution, firm, or other entity that owns shares in a company’ (Mallin 2007, p. 49). Lastly, we define social responsibilities. The corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to the general belief held by growing numbers of citizens that modern business have responsibilities to society that extend beyond their obligations to the shareholders or investors in the firm (Wood 2007, p. 122). It implies that negative business impacts on people and society should be acknowledged and corrected if at all possible (Post, Lawrence & Weber 1999).…

    • 2728 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An organization focused on maximizing profits does not necessarily see social responsibility as important. Therefore, it generally only engages in socially responsible practices…

    • 966 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ‘Narrow View’ argues that profit maximisation is the only objective for a business. Levitt.T wrote, “In the end business has only two responsibilities- to obey the elementary canons of face-to-face civility (honesty, good faith and so on) and to seek material gain”. Milton Friedman argued that business has no social responsibilities other than to maximise profit. Friedman also argues that the corporation is an artificial person and can, therefore, only have "artificial responsibilities." "Business" is apparently an even more artificial construct and therefore we are left with just proprietors and corporate executives who can actually be responsible. Because the function of business organisation is to make money, the owners of corporations employ executives to accomplish the goals, thus managers are obliged to act in the interest of owners. According to Friedman, executives have social corporate responsibilities beyond pursuit of profit. They must spend shareholder money for general social interest such as taxing the owners and spending taxes on social causes.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Objectives of the Firm

    • 2880 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Although firms are assumed to make decisions that increase profit in standard economic analysis, real world firms often pursue other objectives on a day-to-day basis. Some firms set their sights on maximizing sales. For other firms the owners or employees are inclined to enhance personal living standards. And more than a few firms take steps that promote the overall welfare of society. In some cases, these other objectives help a firm pursue profit maximization. In other cases, they prevent a firm from maximizing profit.…

    • 2880 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caprica Energy

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    investor's perspective, the purpose of the business is to maximize profits. But that's not the…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Can a building have moral opinions? Can a building have social responsibility? If a building can't have social responsibility, what does it mean to say that a corporation can? A corporation is simply an artificial legal structure. But the people who are engaged in it, whether the stockholders, whether the executives in it, whether the employees, they all have moral responsibilities.” – Milton Friedman…

    • 3308 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article by Milton Friedman titled the social responsibility of business is to increase profits and the speech given by bill gates at the world economic forum 2008 both address the nagging topic of social responsibility of corporations. Both articles offer tremendous insight on this issue. Friedman points out the contradiction of the notion of social responsibility and the aim of making profit while gates introduces Recognition as a new variable in this equation. The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast both articles.I am going to discuss Friedman's article first. Friedman raises the issue of social responsibility as a contradiction to the sole purpose of a corporation which is make profit. Firstly he points out a corporation is an artificial entity which should also have artificial responsibility in essence it is not a person and only persons can be held socially responsible. Who then do we hold responsible? Perhaps the corporate executive but here another issue arises he has direct responsibility to his employers and not the society and has to conduct business according to their desires this is his primary duty. Friedman argues that the corporation spending money towards a chosen cause is in a way imposing taxes and also deciding how the taxes shall be spent. How does one choose which cause to cater to? He argues that the imposition of taxes and expenditure of tax proceeds are governmental functions. The whole purpose of the corporation of serving the interest of its stockholders is defeated when these taxes are imposed and the proceeds spent for social purpose.However Friedman then points out that though the practice of social responsibility may contradict with the corporations purpose to make money it is justifiable in the long run on other grounds which are often not a reason for the action in the first place. benefits may include such as making it easier to attract desirable employees, it may reduce wage bill or lessen losses from pilferage…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays