This essay aims to examine the history, meaning, practical function, legislation and development of corporate governance in the United Kingdom. Corporate governance is a subject that has become increasingly important over the last few decades and looks set to continue with continuing corporate failures pushing corporate governance to the forefront.
To fully understand the subject of corporate governance in the United Kingdom we must first define corporate governance and understand it's meaning. Schleifer and Vishny (1997) give a succinct, if rather narrow definition that "corporate governance deals with the way suppliers of finance assure themselves of getting a return on their investment". A broader and more functional definition is given by the OECD (1999).
"Corporate governance is the system by which business corporations are directed and controlled. The corporate governance structure specifies the distribution of rights and responsibilities among different participants in the corporation, such as the board, managers, shareholders and other stakeholders, and spells out the rules and procedures for making decisions
on corporate affairs. By doing this, it also provides the structure through which the company objectives are set, and the means of attaining those objectives and monitoring performance."
Corporate governance is a wide and important subject that covers a range of issues from accountability and transparency and the relationship between shareholders, stakeholders and the company's management to the external and internal system of controls of companies to ensure that the best interests of the shareholders are being pursued and met.
The Wikipedia entry for corporate governance (2006) notes; "Corporate governance is a multi-faceted subject. An important theme of corporate governance deals with issues of accountability and fiduciary duty, essentially advocating the implementation of guidelines and mechanisms to ensure good behaviour and protect shareholders. Another key focus is the economic efficiency view, through which the corporate governance system should aim to optimise economic results, with a strong emphasis on shareholders welfare."
In brief, corporate governance is the system of controls to ensure that investors can assure themselves that they will get their investment back.
Jensen and Meckling (1976) developed the agency theory of shareholder-manager relationships as a 'nexus of contracts' between the principle, i.e. the owners and the agent, i.e. the managers. The agent is delegated power to make decisions and spend the principle's money on behalf of the latter. With this arrangement there arises possible problems. The separation of ownership and control dictates that the managers have increased power and levels of information than the owners and could, without monitoring and regulation, not act in the best interests of the shareholders. These agency problems can happen in many ways too numerous to list here but Jensen and Meckling (1976) realised some problems such as Moral - Hazard problems particularly relevant to the UK and US because of the market based contracting economies.
Corporate governance is varied in almost every country depending on a number of factors such as the economic development of the country, the strength of the legal system, the stability of the government but despite this the U.K is decidedly different from that of it's neighbouring regions in the E.U. There is a unitary board of management and a broader shareholder bases as well as hardly any dual shares and no pyramid structures. (Franks et al. 2004) An examination of the history and development of corporate governance and legislation in the U.K may provide some answers to the considerable differences that have occurred in contrast to many other European countries and worldwide.
The current situation as already stated is very different to it's European...
References: Aldcroft, D. (1964), ‘The Entrepreneur and the British Economy, 1870 - 1914 ', Economic History Review, 17, 113-134.
Berle, A. and Means, G. (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Macmillan, New York.
Black, B and Coffee, J. (1994), ‘Hail Britannia?: Institutional Investor Behaviour Under Limited Regulation," Michigan Law Review 92, No. 7, June,
Chandler, A (1990), Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism
Combined Code, (2003), The Combined Code on Corporate Governance, Financial Reporting Council, London.
Corporate governance. (2006). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopaedia. Retrieved 03:52, 22nd December, 2006, from -http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Corporate_governance&oldid=99094840
European Corporate Governance Forum
Franks, J. and Mayer, C. (1997), ‘Corporate Ownership and Control in the U.K., Germany and France ', Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9.4.
Franks, J. Mayer, C. and Rossi, S. (2004), ‘Spending Less Time with the Family: The Decline of Family Ownership in the U.K ', ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance, No. 35.
Financial Reporting Council. (2006), 'The UK Approach to Corporate Governance. ' available at http://www.frc.org.uk/corporate/
Hampel, Sir Ronnie (1998), Committee on Corporate Governance: Final Report, Gee & Co. Ltd, London.
Hermes, (2002), The Hermes Principles, Hermes Pensions Management Ltd. , London.
Jenson, M. and Meckling, W. (1976), ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, ' Journal of Financial Economics 3.
Kirkbride, J. and Letza, S. (2003), 'Establishing the Boundaries of Corporate Governance: Is the UK Moving Toward a Process of Collibration? ', Business and Society Review, 108:4, 463-485.
Mallin, C. (2004), 'Corporate Governance, ' Oxford University Press, London.
Monks, R. (2001), The New Global Investors, Capstone Publishing, Oxford.
OECD (1999), Principles of Corporate Governance, OECD, Paris.
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1997), ‘A Survey of Corporate Governance ', Journal of Finance, Vol L11, No. 2.
Smith, A. (1838), The Wealth of Nations, Ward Lock, London.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document