Preview

Contengency Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1209 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Contengency Theory
Understanding the Model
The Fiedler Contingency Model was created in the mid-1960s by Fred Fiedler, a scientist who helped advance the study of personality and characteristics of leaders.
The model states that there is no one best style of leadership. Instead, a leader's effectiveness is based on the situation. This is the result of two factors – "leadership style" and "situational favorableness" (later called "situational control").
Leadership Style
Identifying leadership style is the first step in using the model. Fiedler believed that leadership style is fixed, and it can be measured using a scale he developed called Least-Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) Scale (see Figure 1).The scale asks you to think about the person who you've least enjoyed working with. This can be a person who you've worked with in your job, or in education or training.You then rate each factor based on this person and add up your scores. If your total score is high, you're likely to be a relationship-orientated leader. If your total score is low, you're more likely to be task-orientated leader.
Figure 1: Least-Preferred Co-Worker Scale Unfriendly | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | -------------------------------------------------
Friendly | Unpleasant | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | -------------------------------------------------
Pleasant | -------------------------------------------------
Rejecting | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | -------------------------------------------------
Accepting | Tense | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | -------------------------------------------------
Relaxed | Cold | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | -------------------------------------------------
Warm | Boring | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | -------------------------------------------------
Interesting | Backbiting | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | -------------------------------------------------
Loyal | Uncooprative | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | -------------------------------------------------
Cooperative | Hostile | 1 2

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unit 27 M1

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are several factors which may affect my choice of leader style in my workplace situations.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gm533 Aj Davis Part a

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The following report presents the detailed statistical analysis of the data collected from a sample of credit customers in the department chain store AJ DAVIS.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fall2011 Test2

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Multiple Choice (1.5 marks each – put the letter of the best answer in the box above)…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evolab Guppies

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Upper West: This is a similar distribution to the one I made. Although it is a smaller sample the distribution is similar.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Study: Two Coaches

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fiedler’s contingency model is designed to help the leader be interactive with their subordinates. The contingency model suggest that it can be determined if they will be effective in a specific setting. The two coaches that are in the case studies are effective in their approach to leadership when it comes to producing winning teams. After carefully reviewing both coaches situation it was obvious that Coach Knight would score low in the LPCs, this low score would mean that he was task driven. Then there is Coach Krzyzewski, he fits the situation where he would score a high LPC because he is motivated through relationships. Both coaches are matched well with their situation. For an example, Coach Knight¸ the highly successful basketball coach confirms Fiedler’s contingency because he is consistent in his leadership approach. Coach Knight’s intense and task-oriented technique seems unvarying. He intensely argues with referees during games and gets very upset to the point where he acts out during games. Coach Knight’s primary goal was to accomplish the task at hand and his minor needs were to build relationships while getting along with others. On the other hand, there is Coach Krzyzewski who spent time getting into his players head in order to understand their…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Working at a large healthcare organization, it is important that managers are aware of the different management styles. This will help in being effective leaders. The theory I have identified is Situational Theory. Situational leadership is based on the idea that there is more than one approach to handle a situation. The four leadership styles used with this theory includes: directing, coaching, delegating and supporting.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exam on Algorithms

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If you replaced the line LET Y = X/3 by the line LET Y = X/5, how would this change the outcome of the above?…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ldr 711

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the assessment, “What is My Leadership Style?” my score leans toward a task-oriented style along with a situational approach. The foundation of situational leadership is the theory that there is not a style that is the best leadership. According to Hersey and Blanchard (1977), a leader believes his or her actions and styles depend on the situation at hand. A situational leader focuses on contextual factors in the work required (Clawson, 2006).…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. In your own words, describe two main differences between classical and empirical probabilities. The differences between classical and empirical probabilities are that classical assumes that all outcomes are likely to occur, while empirical involves actually physically observing and collecting the information.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    quiz week 1

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A theory that explains the most effective pattern of leadership behavior in a specified situation is best classified as…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Northouse (2013) explained that situational leadership model is one that consists of a directive and a supportive dimension of influence. In essence, a situational leader is one who attempts to match one’s leadership style to what is described as the competence and commitment of an employee (Northouse, 2013). For example, if Ann decides to use the second style (s2) referred to as the coaching approach. Then, Ann would be demonstrating high directive behavior as well as high supporting behavior (Northouse, 2013). Northouse (2013) also stated that, in this approach, an organizational leader communicates on both goal accomplishment and meeting an employee’s socioemotional need.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Here are a number of personality traits that may or may not apply to you. Please…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lpc & Path-Goal Theories

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare and contrast between the Feidler’s Least Preferred Coemployee scale (LPC) and Path-Goal theories of leadership Fiedler’s…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ilm Understanding Leadership

    • 3173 Words
    • 13 Pages

    There are a number of factors that will influence the style of leadership a leader may choose, such as:…

    • 3173 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second strength is that it emphasizes leader flexibility (Graeff, 1983). Situational leadership stresses that leaders need to find out about their subordinates’ needs and then adapt their leadership style accordingly. Situational leadership recognizes that employees act differently when doing different tasks, and that they may act differently during different stages of the same task. Effective leaders are those who can change their own style based on the task requirements and the subordinates’ needs.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays