WORKERS PLAYTIME? UNRAVELLING THE PARADOX OF COVERT RESISTANCE IN ORGANIZATIONS
Department of Management
University of Melbourne
Parkville, Vic 3010
Chapter for Paradoxical New Directions in Organization and Management Theory. Edited by Stewart Clegg. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
(Second Draft) July 2001
The problem of whether employee resistance is possible under corporate relations of power that target the very hearts and minds of workers has become an increasingly important issue in recent critical organization studies. With the advent of cultural cleansing' (Strangleman and Roberts, 1999), designer selves' (Casey, 1995) and other forms of normative controls' (Kunda, 1992) related to culture engineering and teamwork numerous studies have argued that the very capacity for workers to resist management has been insidiously undermined. In the past workers could usually resist corporate controls because they tended to be less normative but when the very identities of workers are intentionally controlled dissent is all but erased from the discursive landscape (Willmott, 1993). The problem with such a pessimistic reading of new management technologies, of course, is the unwarranted exaggeration of the success of management power and the underestimation of the myriad of ways some workers resist corporate control, even under the most claustrophobic hegemonic conditions (Thompson and Ackroyd, 1995). Just because open, overt and collectivised forms of resistance characteristic of Fordism are less prevalent today does not necessarily mean that the recalcitrant worker has finally been subdued. Indeed, a recent stream of research has pointed to more covert, quotidian and even subjective' modalities of worker resistance in high-commitment' organizations, which were perhaps missed in the past because of their subtly and ostensible innocuousness (Fleming and Sewell, forthcoming). In light of attempts to broaden definitions of worker opposition an array of employee practices have been highlighted as possible strategies of resistance to cultural control. Joking, irony, cynicism and scepticism, for example, have been documented as weapons' workers may use to block and resist new types of corporate domination at the level of selfhood, as our review will shortly demonstrate. In evaluating the research investigating these expressions of resistance, however, we have identified an interesting tension, or paradox, regarding their effectiveness as forms of opposition. Some commentators have argued that resistance articulated in the form of humour, irony and cynicism may have the paradoxical outcome of inadvertently reproducing the domination workers seek to escape because they are given a specious and illusionary sense of freedom and disengage from more material' and traditionally located resistances. Indeed, Collinson (1992, 1994), du Gay and Salaman (1992) among others demonstrate how resistance through joking and cynicism, for example, can actually assume the (paradoxical) status of consent due to the safety valve' effects they can have in certain power relationships (also see Fleming and Spicer, 2000). In this chapter we attempt to unravel this paradox by surfacing the models of power underpinning judgements of effective' or ineffective' resistance in relation to humour, irony and cynicism. It is suggested that those interpretations that consider humour, irony and cynicism ineffective outright still implicitly employ a singular model of power that judges all forms of opposition against the standard of radical upheaval and economic transformation (Fleming and Sewell, forthcoming). Such an approach is, of course, important for highlighting the cases in which some types of resistance are inadvertently functional to a dominant system of power, but it may also marginalise many other forms of transgression that...
References: Ackroyd, S. and Thompson, P. (1999). Organizational Misbehaviour. London: Sage.
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bourdieu, P. (1983) ‘Social space and symbolic power '. Sociological Theory, 1, 14-25.
Bradney, P. (1957). ‘The joking relationship in industry. ' Human Relations, 10, 179-189.
Brown, R. H. (1987). Society as Text: Essays in Rhetoric, Reason and Reality. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labour Process Under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Casey, C. (1995). Work, Self and Society: After Industrialism. London: Sage.
Clegg, S. (1989). Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.
Clegg, S. and Dunkerley, D. (1980). Organization, Class and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Collinson, D. (1988). ‘Engineering Humour: Masculinity, Joking and Conflict in Shopfloor Relations. ' Organization Studies, 9, 2: 181-99.
Collinson, D. (1992). Managing the Shopfloor. London: Sage.
Coser, R. L. (1959). ‘Some Radical Functions of Laughter: A Study of Humour in a Hospital Setting. ' Human Relations, 12: 171-182.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Deal, T. and Kennedy, A. (1982). Corporate Cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Addison Wesley.
Dean, J, Brandes, P, and Dharwadkar, R. (1998). ‘Organizational Cynicism. ' Academy of Management Review, 23, 2: 341-352.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. B. Massumi. Minneapolis: Minneapolis University Press.
du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and Identity at Work. London: Sage.
du Gay, P
Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.
Edwards, P., Collinson, D
Filby, I. and Willmott, H. (1988). ‘Ideologies and Contradictions in a Public Relations Department. ' Organization Studies, 9, 3: 335-349.
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality, Vol One: An Introduction. Trans. R. Hurley. Penguin Books.
Fraser, N. (1995) ‘From redistribution to recognition: Dilemmas of justice in a post-socialist age ', New Left Review, 212, pp.68-93
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996) The end of capitalism as we know it: A feminist critique of political economy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hatch, M. J., and Ehrlich, S. (1993). ‘Spontaneous Humor as an Indicator of Paradox and Ambiguity in Organizations. ' Organization Studies, 14, 4: 505-526.
Jermier, J., Knights, D. and Nord, W. (eds.) (1994). Resistance and Power in Organizations. London: Routledge.
Johansson, U. and Woodilla, J. (1999). The Double Dimension of Irony: A way both to keep and to change existing reality constructions. Paper presented to Critical Management Studies Conference, Manchester, 1999.
Kanter, D. and Mirvis, P. (1989). The Cynical Americans: Living and Working in the Age of Discontent and Disillusion. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kets de Vries, M
Kirkegaard, S. (1992). Concept of irony: With continual reference to Socrates together with notes of Schellings Berlin lectures (Kierkegaard 's Writings, 2). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Knights, D. and Collinson, D. (1987). ‘Disciplining the Shopfloor: A Comparison of the Disciplinary Effects of Managerial Psychology and Financial Accounting. ' Accounting, Organization and Society, 12: 5, 457-77.
Knights, D. and Vurdubakis, T. 1994. ‘Foucault, Power, Resistance and All That '. In J. Jermier, W. Nord and D. Knights (eds) Resistance and Power in Organizations. London: Routledge.
Kondo, D. (1990). Crafting Selves: Power, Gender and Discourse of Identity in a Japanese Workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Lasch, C. (1978). Culture of Narcissism: American Life in the Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: Norton.
Linstead, S. (1985b). ‘Jokers wild: The importance of humour in the maintenance of organizational culture. ' Sociological Review, 33, 14: 741-767.
Malone, P. B. (1980). ‘Humour: A Double Edged Tool for Today 's Managers. ' Academy of Management Review, 5, 3: 357-360.
Marcuse, H (1972). Counter revolution and Revolt. Boston: Beacon
McKinley, A. and Taylor, P. (1996). ‘Power, Surveillance and Resistance: Inside the ‘Factory of the Future. ' In Peter Ackers, Chris Smith and Paul Smith (eds.), The New Workplace and Trade Unionism: 279-300. London: Routlegde.
Nickson, D., Warhurst, C., Witz, A. and Cullen, A. M. (2001). ‘The Importance of Being Aesthetic: Work, Employment and Service Organization. ' In A. Sturdy, I. Grugulis and H. Willmott (eds). Customer Service: Empowerment and Entrapment. London: Palgrave.
Parker, M. (2000). Organizational Culture and Identity. London: Sage.
Pascale, R. and Athos, A. (1982). The Art of Japanese Management: Applications for American Executives. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Pena, D. (1996). The Terror of the Machine: Technology, work, gender and ecology on the U.S – Mexco Border. CMAS Books: University of Texas. Austin.
Peters, T. and Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper and Row.
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in Organizations. Pitman: Mashfield, Mass.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, R. (1998) Achieving our country : leftist thought in twentieth-century America. London: Harvard University Press.
Rosenthal, P, Hill, S and Peccei, R
Roy, D. (1958). ‘Banana Time: Job Satisfaction and Informal Interaction. ' Human Organization. 18: 158-168.
Sewell, G and Wilkinson, B. (1992). ‘Someone to watch over me: Surveillance, Discipline and the Just-in-Time labour process. ' Sociology, 26, 2: 27-289.
Strangleman, T. and Roberts, I. (1999). ‘Looking Through the Window of Opportunity: the Cultural Cleansing of Workplace Identity. ' Sociology, 33, 1: 47-67.
Sturdy, A. and Fineman, S. (2001). ‘Struggles for the Control of Affect – Resistance as Politics and Emotion. ' In A. Sturdy, I. Grugulis and H. Willmott (2001) (eds), Customer Service - Empowerment and Entrapment (London: Macmillan/Palgrave).
Townley, B. (1994). Reframing Human Resource Management: Power, Ethics and the Subject at Work. London: Sage.
Trethewey, A. (1997) ‘Resistance, identity, and empowerment: A postmodern feminist analysis of clients in a human service organization '. Communication Monographs, 64, 281-301.
Trethewey, A. (1999) ‘Isn 't it Ironic: Using irony to explore the contradictions of organisation life. Western Journal of Communication. 63, 2, 140-167.
Wanous, J., Reichers, A. and Austin, J. (2000). ‘Cynicism about Organizational Change. ' Group and Organization Management, 25, 2: 132-153.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to Labour: How working Class Kids get Working Class Jobs. Westmead: Saxon House.
Willmott, H. (1993). ‘Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: Managing Cultures in Modern Organizations. ' Journal of Management Studies, 30, 4: 515-552.
Žižek, S. (1989). Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso
Please join StudyMode to read the full document