Preview

Constitutional Monarchy In Canada

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
712 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constitutional Monarchy In Canada
Yes to Constitutional Monarchy Canada is a constitutional monarchy; this means that the powers of the monarchy in Canada are limited by the Constitution. Our monarch is now Elizabeth II, who is also the Queen of the United Kingdom. As our Queen does not live in Canada, she appoints, under the advice of our Prime Minister, a Governor General to represent her authority in Canada. There is a great debate among Canadians, on if they really need a constitutional monarchy. The fact is Canada does need a monarch. Firstly, power corrupts people. The monarch lends its powers to the elected politicians, as long as they act within the Constitution. In the event that the elected politicians succumb to corruption, and/or disobey the Constitution, the monarch is able to act as a safeguard and take away that authority that was given to them in the first place. Canada’s armed forces and naval vessels swear allegiance to the monarch, which also helps protect the people, in the act of corruption. Constitutional monarchy also helps act as a symbol to Canadians, and it already appears throughout national life. The Queen’s image …show more content…
Many people comment on the fact with the monarchy system, Canada still isn’t fully independent from Britain, with the Queen and her representatives being able to control the Prime Minister. This statement is completely blown out of proportion; first of all the monarch isn’t involved in any of the day-to-day operations of the government. Secondly, there are many examples of the Prime Minister still having much of the power. The Prime Minister can also tell the Governor General when to dissolve parliament. The Parliament still holds most of the power, where the monarch is more seen as a national figurehead. Lastly it keeps the powers of government distributed equally, by making sure the elected head is also not the head of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    * Constitutional Monarchy: Powers of the monarch reduced by laws. Governor General represents the Monarch. E.G. Australia operates as a democracy.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rejection of constitutionalism by Charles I’s sour relationship with the Parliament and Oliver Cromwell’s dissolving of Parliament, along with the acceptance of constitutionalism through the Glorious Revolution during the reign of William and Mary all resulted in a strong English power and newly reinforced parliamentary rights.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thesis: Although it took nearly a century to do so, Canada transformed from a self-governing British colony to a fully independent nation through the defining moments of Vimy Ridge, Chanak crisis, and the Statute of Westminister,…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many events that have sculpted Canada’s autonomy through our history and created the independent nation we live in today. Before and during the First World War Canada did everything Britain said because we were under their BNA act. However, in 1922 after the war, Britain and Turkey were fighting over the British controlled port of Chanak. When Britain told Canada to come fight with them, instead of saying yes, Prime Minister King said we would take it to Parliament and have a vote. Fortunately, the dispute ended before anyone had to go to war. The following year, Canada and America created a treaty that protected…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of the ways Canada remained independent of foreign control are: When president Reagan’s administration had a project they were trying to get Canada involved in called the Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI, but also referred to as Star Wars). This was a plan to arm satellites that could destroy soviet missiles from space. Not many people believed the plan would work and even if it did there would no longer be balance between the two superpowers, ergo in 1985, Prime Minister Brian Mulroney politely said “no”. President George Bush brought the idea back to life in 2004, and wanted Canada to participate in the new missile defence initiative, but it wasn’t clear who the missiles where protecting North America from. Many Canadians thought that Canada should participate but Prime Minister Paul Martin decided against it. After 9/11 Canada aided the US in attacking Afghanistan, to get to where the Taliban government was aiding Muslim terrorists, but Canada refused to participate in using the war as a pretext for ousting Saddam Hussein. The UN also didn’t approve of Bush’s attack on Iraq. After World War II Canada had completely disengaged itself from the British Empire, ergo Canadian representatives refused to go along with British plans. They put their powers to good use for peace rather than a “mother country”.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When Canada’s founders were thinking of Canada’s legislature system they valued accountability.[4] Unicameralism is a single legislative house or chamber and their just isn’t the same accountability as the bicameralism legislatures.[5] They did not want one “high-handed Cabinet” because this could pose a threat and to the founders this was “classic forms of autocracy.”[6] This is why bicameralism was introduced to the legislature. They were concentrated on checks on balances in the form of The Cabinet, the Commons, and the Senate, which were like the three branches of government.[7] What is funny is that the word “democracy” was used differently back in those days and they used mixed or balanced.[8] The Founders were viewed as being Liberal democrats because of them picking the bicameralism legislature over the unicamerlism legislature.[9] Also the Father’s visions were never for a “fusion of powers” in the legislature, but that the…

    • 3508 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Canada and Germany are countries that have different political ideologies also they have some parts of government bear similarities.Although they are two different country, there are have three clear difference between two government systems they use.First, Canada has a three parts of parliament,with House of Common, Senate and Government Governor. In contrast, Germany only have two parts of parliament,with a Bundestag and Bundersrat.Secondly, Canada is president have power, but in Germany is Chancellor.Finally, compare advantage and disadvantage of two government system, Germany’s goverment system is more…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This newfound sense of independence both among citizens and internationally led to Canada beginning to really form its own unique culture, and governmental policies, not feeling as much obligation to act as their founders…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Congress is a bicameral legislature that includes the House of Representatives (435 members representing the population) and the Senate (100 members representing the states)…

    • 2005 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    King managed to get Canada majority of its independence and made Canada a self-governing country. He also got Canada out of the dark and ended the great depression. He brought Canada’s economy to a stable position again and created new jobs causing the unemployment rate to drop. King successfully led Canada through World War II, which increased Canadian economy, vanished the effects of the depression from Canada, and at the same time created a great reputation for Canada. In conclusion, King was a successful leader and deserved the position of Prime Minister of Canada. He never gave up on Canada and also brought hope to Canada at the worst times, which brought Canada to where it is now. He believed in Canada and only because of that he was a successful man and was able to make Canada a great…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Canada regulation

    • 5450 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Canada is a North American country consisting of ten provinces and three territories. Canada is a federal state that is governed as a parliamentary democracy and a constitutional monarchy with Queen Elizabeth II as its head of state. It is a bilingual nation with both English and French as official languages at the federal level.…

    • 5450 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "It is what we prevent, rather than what we do that counts most in Government." (Mackenzie King august 26, 1936) This statement sums up the best secrets of Mackenzie King's success as prime minister, and perhaps, the key to governing Canada effectively. King's record of prime minister is sometimes difficult to judge. He had no uninteresting images, he gave no repetitive speeches, and he champions no drastic stage. He is remembered for his easygoing, passive compromise and conciliation (Gregory, page 267). Yet Mackenzie King led Canada for a total of twenty-two years, through half the Depression and all of the Second World War. Like every other prime minister, he had to possess ambition, endurance and determination to become prime minister and, in spite if appearances, his accomplishments in that role required political acuity, decisiveness and faultless judgment.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Electoral System In Canada

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A good government is a reflection of its citizens. The mechanics of a good government distinguish it from different governments around the world. However, how a government elects its leader is a big part of the way it runs in general. Many governments have different systems in which they elect their leader. In North America, electing a leader is a big responsibility for the citizens of that country. Particularly in Canada, our electoral system has been the same for many years and relies on the citizens to make a decision. Canada uses a system called first-past the-post or single member plurality . This system consists of a simple objective; to receive a majority of the votes . This system has worked well for many years without any major issues.…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Canadian Monarchy

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Crown “serves as the concept of the state in Canada and the Canadian state is the legal person called Her Majesty in Right of Canada (Lagassé, 2013)”, which is why everyone working within the parliament have to swear allegiance to the Queen. Canada’s head of state the sovereign, has executive power which means the authority to implement the laws, as well as legislative power. The difference between the Crown and the Monarch according to Mintz, et al. (2015), is the Crown is just a symbol of what belongs to the Canadian public, the body that prosecutes cases, and as government acting as a trustee. The Monarch refers to the actual person, who at this point is Queen Elizabeth. The Crown holds importance because “it was under the umbrella of the crown- it was thanks to the flexible, adaptable, evolving system of constitutional monarchy- that democratic government eventually prevailed in nineteenth-century ( Michael Jackson,…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has found a happy medium between too much and too little government and has found a place that ensure personal freedom as long as it does not harm others. If we compare Canada with Egypt as well as the US we see that they sit in the middle of the two. If we compare the amount of gun violence in Canada compared to the US there is a drastic difference. If we look at stats of gun crime per 100 residents that own guns, we see that the US is 3 times more than canada. This could be tied with the varying amounts of government control. In Canada there is government control about gun permits and there are certain guns such as handguns that are held in the restricted category. In the US you can get permits a lot easier and for many more guns; guns that are lethal such as handguns. We see that the self interests of certain individuals without some control of the government is not beneficial to society. We also see the benefits of having a government which allows its citizens power to a certain extent. Unlike Egypt, Canada allows its citizens to have a say in the direction of the country and how they want to live their life. This has been proven to be successful. Citizens are given the opportunity to pursue their self-interests. This causes constant push through society, letting us advance without causing problems that relate to little government control. Another part of Canada that shows an ideal balance between government and freedom is the way our market is set up. Canada is considered a mixed economy in which certain sectors of the market are owned by the government and other sectors are owned by the individual. The health care is owned by the government, and yet businesses can be owned by the individual. This ensures that while we can still have self-interest and desire to do what we want, we still have parts of our life that will always be there such as health care. Canada connects…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays