Preview

Constitutional Law Australia - Interpretations

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4001 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constitutional Law Australia - Interpretations
Constitutional Interpretation: Engineers’ Case and criticisms of Callinan J in the Workchoices’ Case.
By Mark Walker
Introduction

In the dissenting judgment made by Callinan J in the landmark New South Wales v Commonwealth (“Workchoices’ Case”), a strong criticism was mounted against constitutional interpretation methods employed in the judicial forum. Explicitly, this conjecture was focused at Isaacs J’s judgement in Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (“Engineers’ Case”), where a textualism approach to constitutional interpretation was adopted. Callinan J expressed the Engineers’ Case as “less than satisfactory”, using “detached language” to discredit its literal methodology of interpreting the constitution. Such a claim is unsubstantiated and will thusly be deconstructed, so that it can clearly be seen that the approach taken in Engineers’ Case was manifestly apt for the purposes of constitutional interpretation.
Textualism at essence is an approach to statutory interpretation, whereby the courts are required to derive the meaning of a provision from its literal construction without a consideration of other factors such as the spirit or purpose.
Callinan J’s critique is not without its merits, and concisely described a textualism approach as disregarding important considerations such as “fundamental policy of the constitution, federalism, and the careful division of power... the framers intended”. Another criticism that Callinan J expresses is through a reluctance to read the constitution as a whole, despite admitting the willingness for Engineers’ Case to adhere to the ‘golden’ rules of construction. However, as convincing as this argument appears, it is not entirely accurate and tends to conveniently omit other important considerations necessary for constitutional interpretation.
Divergence from orginalism to textualism

The Engineers’ Case for its time was a revolutionary judgement which sought to overrule the concepts



Bibliography: Cases Abebe v Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510 Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (1920) CLR 129. Australian Boot Trade Employees’ Federation v Whybrow & Co (1910) 11 CLR 311. Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth (1951) 83 CLR 1. Baxter v Commissioners of Taxation (1907) 4 CLR 1087. Cheng v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 248. Commonwealth v Tasmania (1983) 158 CLR 1. D’Emden v Pedder (1904) 1 CLR 91. Dugan v Mirror Newspapers Ltd (1979) 142 CLR 583. Eastman v Queen (2000) 203 CLR 1. Ex parte Boilermakers’ Society of Australia (1956) 94 CLR 254. Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (1996) 138 ALR 577. Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 145 ALR 96. Mabo v Queensland [no 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1. Melbourne Corporation v Commonwealth (1947) 74 CLR 31. New South Wales v Commonwealth 2006) 229 CLR 1. Port McDonnell Professional Fishermens’ Assoc Inc v South Australia (1989) 168 CLR 340. Printz v United States 521 US 898 (1997). R v Burah [1878] 3 AC. R v Phillips (1970) 125 CLR 93. Re Nolan; Ex parte Young (1991) 172 CLR 460. Richardson v Forestry Commission (1988) 164 CLR 261. Russel v Russel (1976) 134 CLR 495. Secondary Sources Christopher Birch, ‘Mill, Frege and the High Court: The connotation/denotation distinction in constitutional interpretation’ (2003) 23 Australian Bar Review 296. Tony Blackshield and George Williams, Australian Constitutional Law: Law and Theory (The Federation Press, 5th ed: 2010). Peter Butt, Butterworths Concise Australian Legal Dictionary (LexisNexis Butterworths, Australia: 3rd ed, 2004). Susan M Crennan, ‘Scepticism and Judicial Method’ (2008) 82 ALJ 169. Harry Evans, ‘The Failure of law and the superiority of politics: republicanism versus legal constitutionalism’ (2005) 8 Law and Policy Review 3. Stephen Gagelerm, ‘Beyond the text’ (2009) 32 Australian Bar Review 138. Hon Justice W M C Gummow, ‘Form or Substance’ (2008) 30 Australian Bar Review. Mason, ‘The Role of a Constitutional Court in a Federation’ (1986) 16 FL Rev 1. Muller, ‘Public Choice II’ (1991) Cambridge UP 331. Murray Gleeson, ‘The constitutional decisions of the Founding Fathers’ (2007) 81 Australian Law Journal 791. Paul Grice, ‘Studies in the Way of Words’ (1991) Harvard University Press. Cheryl Saunders, ‘Interpreting the Constitution’ (2004) 15 PLR 289. Sharman, ‘Secession and Federation’ (1993) 3 UTAC 97. JJ Spigelman, ‘The poet’s rich resource: Issues in statutory interpretation’ (2001) 21 Australian Bar Review 224. Prof Emeritus Geoffrey De Q Walker, ‘Seven Pillars of Centralism: Engineers’ Case and Federalism’ (2002) 76 Australian Law Journal 678, Hon Jusitce Christine Wheeler, ‘Shifting sands: Implications and the consitition’ (2007) 81 Australian Law Journal 544. [ 3 ]. (1920) CLR 129. [ 4 ]. New South Wales v Commonwealth (“Workchoices’ Case”) (2006) 229 CLR 1, 305. [ 5 ]. Peter Butt, Butterworths Concise Australian Legal Dictionary (LexisNexis Butterworths, Australia: 3rd ed, 2004). [ 6 ]. Workchoices’ Case (2006) 229 CLR 1, 305. [ 8 ]. (1904) 1 CLR 91. [ 9 ]. Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (“Engineers’ Case”) (1920) CLR 129, 145. [ 12 ]. Justice B M Selway, ‘Methodologies of constitutional interpretation in the High Court of Australia’ (2003) 14 Public Law Review 234, 239. [ 14 ]. Abebe v Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510, 531 [41] by Gleeson CJ & Mchugh J. [ 15 ]. Commonwealth v Tasmania (1983) 158 CLR 1, 361 by Dawson J. [ 16 ]. (1997) 145 ALR 96. [ 17 ]. (1996) 138 ALR 577. [ 18 ]. Hon Jusitce Christine Wheeler, ‘Shifting sands: Implications and the consitition’ (2007) 81 Australian Law Journal 544 at 551. [ 20 ]. Workchoices’ Case (2006) 229 CLR 1, 306. [ 22 ]. Murray Gleeson, ‘The constitutional decisions of the Founding Fathers’ (2007) 81 Australian Law Journal 791, 793. [ 24 ]. Australian Boot Trade Employees’ Federation v Whybrow & Co (1910) 11 CLR 311, 314. [ 26 ]. Re Nolan; Ex parte Young (1991) 172 CLR 460, 496. [ 28 ]. (2000) 203 CLR 1, 44, 81. [ 29 ]. Engineers’ Case (1920) CLR 129, 151. [ 31 ]. Prof Emeritus Geoffrey De Q Walker, ‘Seven Pillars of Centralism: Engineers’ Case and Federalism’ (2002) 76 Australian Law Journal 678, 703. [ 32 ]. Stephen Gagelerm, ‘Beyond the text’ (2009) 32 Australian Bar Review 138, 140. [ 34 ]. Walker, above n 26, 689; with reference to Russel v Russel (1976) 134 CLR 495, 539 [21]-[23] by Zines J. [ 35 ]. Baxter v Commissioners of Taxation (1907) 4 CLR 1087, 1105. [ 36 ]. Cheng v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 248, 321-322 as per Kirby J. [ 38 ]. Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth (1951) 83 CLR 1, 262-263. [ 39 ]. Tony Blackshield and George Williams, Australian Constitutional Law: Law and Theory (The Federation Press, 5th ed: 2010), 9. [ 40 ]. Engineers’ Case (1920) CLR 129 at 151-152. [ 41 ]. Ex parte Boilermakers’ Society of Australia (1956) 94 CLR 254. [ 43 ]. Workchoices’ Case (2006) 229 CLR 1 at 305. [ 44 ]. Mabo v Queensland [no 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1 at 42. [ 47 ]. Melbourne Corporation v Commonwealth (1947) 74 CLR 31, 79. [ 50 ]. Christopher Birch, ‘Mill, Frege and the High Court: The connotation/denotation distinction in constitutional interpretation’ (2003) 23 Australian Bar Review 296, 308.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    • Sections 51 & 52 assign legislative powers to Cth Parliament. • Characterisation = process of determining whether a law falls within one of these heads of power. • The question is whether the law relates to the subject matter or purpose of the heads of power in a way that allows it to be described as a law “with respect to” that head of power. • Simplest view of ‘characterisation’& the judicial review of legislation encapsulated by Roberts J in United States v Butler (1936)…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pmsp Unit 1

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Black, D 1998, Federation Issues, Constitution Centre of Western Australia, viewed 15 April 2012, http://www.ccentre.wa.gov.au…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: Rawle, William. A View of the Constitution of the United States of America, 2nd ed. Clark N.J: Lawbook Exchange, 2003.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    | An industrial dispute between the Amalgamated Society of Engineers and employers across Australia included three employers from the Western Australian government.The ASE asserted that the Cth industrial award applied to all members including State employeess51(xxxv) ‘conciliation and arbitration for the prevention and settlement of industrial disputes extending beyond the limits of any one State’Was the industrial award made under the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 (Cth) binding on the State of Western Australia?The majority held that the Act was a valid exercise of power under s 51(xxxv); State employers with industrial dispute were subject to Cth Arbitration – States were subject to Cth law…

    • 28193 Words
    • 113 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 4 ]. Hodder-Williams, Richard (2003) ‘The US Constitution’, in Singh, Robert, Governing America: the politics of a divided democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 53.…

    • 3552 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australian Property Law

    • 63351 Words
    • 254 Pages

    Table of Contents d 5 Torrens Title Lan Introduction 5 Principle of Indefeasibility 5 Key Provisions (RP Act) 5 Deferred v immediate indefeasibility 6 Frazer v Walker 1967 6 Breskvar v Wall (1971) 7 What will attract indefeasibility? 8 Leases: 9 Mercantile Credits Ltd v Shell Co of Australia Ltd (1976) 9 Karacominakis v Big Country Developments (2000) 11 Mortgages: 11 Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Ltd (2007) 11 Volunteers 12 Bogdanovic v Koteff (1988) 12 Rasmussen v Rasmussen [1995] 13 Exceptions to Indefeasibility 14 Fraud Exception: 15 Loke Yew v Port Swettenham Rubber Co Ltd [1913] 15 Assets Co Ltd v Mere Roihi [1905] 16 Schultz v Corwill Properties (1969) 16 Russo v Bendigo Bank Ltd (1993) 17 The In Personam Exception 18 Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) (1988) 18 Mercantile Mutual Life Insurance Co Ltd v Gosper (1991) 20 Vassos v State Bank of South Australia (1993) 20 Special equity cases: 21 Personal equity and breach of trust: 22 Personal Equities and Mistake 23 OTHER EXCEPTIONS; OVERRIDING STATUTES 23 The Register, equitable interests and caveats 26 The Register 26 Bursill Enterprises Pty Ltd v Berger Bros Trading Co Pty Ltd 26 White v Betalli [2007] NSWCA 243 27 Equitable interests and unregistered instruments 27 Barry v Heider (1914) 19…

    • 63351 Words
    • 254 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia 's Federal System is dynamic and the division of lawmaking power between the Commonwealth and State since 1901 has changed dramatically; Critically discuss, focussing on the major reasons for those changes.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ever since its inception, one of the High Court’s primary duties has been to interpret the Australian Constitution. There have been many methodologies used to do so and many schools of thought (have been adopted by different judges) in approximately the last hundred years, but so far there still isn’t one consistent and cohesive way of interpretation . In this essay three types of options or methodologies that have been more commonly used by High Court judges will be discussed. They include: literalism/legalism, originalism and progressivism. Other options that may be considered by the High Court will also be examined in this paper.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Senate Reparations

    • 2035 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The High Court of Australia and the Supreme Court of the United States have important roles in determining the federal distribution of powers and acting as ‘Constitutional guardians’. Both courts also exercise their powers as ultimate appellate courts to safeguard liberal rights and to protect their citizens from arbitrary governmental powers under the rule of law. The quality of these courts is underpinned by the ‘impartiality, integrity, and independence’ of the judges, which depends largely on the framework of judicial appointments.…

    • 2035 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A new era has emerged from the societal and legal changes that have occurred in Australia. The age of Judicial activism has taken over the more traditional method of judicial formalism. Supporters of the latter’s concerns that it promotes power without responsibility, and blurs the separation of powers, however the supporters of the former agree that inevitable changes in society force the judiciary to acknowledge that judicial formalism is a method that is not completely obsolete, but takes is less of a primary concern as it were, compared to other factors that effect a case.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CABOOLTURE STATE HIGH SCHOOL BUSINESS & SOCIAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT YEAR 11 LEGAL STUDIES EXTENDED RESPONSE ITEM 1.1 TOPIC: The Legal System Australian Constitution STUDENT: Grace Fenwick TEACHER: Mr Keehn (BSK) ISSUE DATE: 27/02/15 DUE DATE:…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 2 ]. Melvin Urofsky, and Paul Finkelman. Documents of American Constitutional & Legal History.(New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 419.…

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Marshall

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wood, Gordon. “The Father of the Court.” New Republic (1997): 38-41. Web. 12 June 2012.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3035096333

    • 2414 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Lindell, G. (1994). Future Directions in Australian Constitutional Law: Essays in Honour of Professor Leslie Zines. Federation Press.…

    • 2414 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays