Preview

Consensus vs Coalition

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
760 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Consensus vs Coalition
Consensus vs Coalition. In the world of creating policy programs the demands of both political groups and political individuals are crucial. When a proposal or a sensitive issue is brought up political parties either join together to form a coalition building, or discuss the options though a consensus building. In a consensus building local participation and speaking out is crucial for the party’s success, while in a coalition groups can bind together and become more influential. Depending on a country’s current political situation a coalition or consensus building will be formed. A Coalition building is a temporary alliance or partnership of political groups to receive a common purpose or goal. Coalitions form between groups that have similar values, interests and goals. For example, the United States offered financial aid and political benefits to countries that joined its coalition against Iraq in 2003. The United States also threatened negative repercussions for those who failed to join, and much worse for those who sided with Saddam Hussein. Although this was a coalition of nations a coalition of organizations can be affective too. A coalition of organizations or parties can alter more issues than a single organization working alone and increase the chances it will be in their favor. Once groups unite, each group 's vision of change broadens and it becomes more difficult for opposition groups to disregard the coalition 's efforts as dismissible or as special interests. Once two or more groups become united it becomes more difficult for imposing groups to alter what the coalition building has in mind. Although this may be the case, coalitions have negatives. Like anything there is always a pro and a con to a situation. Since coalitions are based on an alliance of different groups its necessary for each side to carry its weight. Most commonly if a part of the alliance begins to suffer, the group will suffer too. In Nigeria, coalition building has


Cited: http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/consensus_building/ http://www.colorado.edu/conflict/peace/treatment/consens.htm http://www.beyondintractability.org http://www.catwinternational.org/factbook/Nigeria.php/essay/coalition_building/ http://www.ustr.gov/Document_Library/Press_Releases/2001/June/USTR_Releases_Details_on_US-China_Consensus_on_China 's_WTO_Accession.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the pluralist model of democracy, pressure groups play an essential role. Political parties cannot provide adequate representation for the full range of diverse interests and opinions in a modern democracy because their key function is to aggregate interests into a coherent political entity capable of governing the country. Pressure groups enable particular interests and causes to be heard and to exert influence in public decision and decision-making. Yet it is precisely the representation of specialist interests and of single issues which may give cause for concern, both in terms of the methods used to achieve objectives and of the undue power and influence which particular lobbies can exert.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consensus and Conformity

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States had appeared to be dominated by consensus and conformity in the 1950s. As the commotions of the first half of the century ended, people were relieved but faced oncoming internal issues. The Great Depression and the two Great Wars caused people to seek tranquility and harmony. The fifties were the decade of change led by president Eisenhower. During this time the nation was in an up rise in many ways. The economy was booming as the Gross National Product more than doubled from the past decade. Thus there was a rise in consumer spending which had a domino effect on the economy. Though it was unexpected, many issues arrived such as the fear of communism and the suspicion of communists hiding in the government. At this period the youth were in the process of change as there was a great break in traditional values. In the midst of all the upheaval civil rights factions saw it as an ideal opportunity to correct the differences of society. Primarily, these groups’ goals were to desegregate the nation.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The point of any collaboration is to bring together different ideas for one solution. By exchanging opinions, everyone can decide what works best for the group. When too many like minded people come together, they dole out the same product. If a group contains all organizers or thinkers, they might have a 10 page paper of all conflicting ideas because they couldn’t agree on one topic. History’s bloodiest events usually started with one group of likeminded people pushing their ideas onto the rest of the world.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Minor Parties

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this paper, I will be discussing the impact of minor parties. Minor parties are political parties who have little to no impact on elections due to the amount of supporters and/or money is put into the party. However, in the United States, minor parties sometimes have a huge impact on politics and elections, whether it’s just getting their word out there and the major parties actually listen and discuss their issues, or they can even change which major party wins the election. Whatever the case may be, it shows that minor parties are just as effective as the major parties, although they have never come out on top. Just because they are minor, does not mean they have no say or no impact in government. They are just as important as the major parties, and they should always be taken into consideration during election time.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In life it is important to develop an understanding of political parties. Political parties began in the United States and we now consider them an essential part of democracy. Parties serve five basic functions in a political system. First, they allow a method of communication between citizens and their government. Through communication, citizens are informed of the processes of government and politics, and also receive information regarding political issues. Next, parties provide representation of the citizens to the government. Third, parties provide interest articulation, in which citizens can identify their feelings on particular issues that are important to them, but not necessarily the rest of the population. Fourth, political parties are the sole means of aggregating these issues into larger categories, which can then be expressed to the government in a logical and persuasive form. Finally, political parties are the only sector of society in which political leaders are selected and recruited, to later be voted for or against by the public…

    • 2445 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Language Analysis

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    our country is the overall interpretation of our coalitions, to our nation and ourselves. Because of…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Module 13 Vocabulary

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Coalition- An organization of people or countries involved in a pact or treaty (the Constitution).…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this book, authors Baumgartner and Jones present an analysis of the nature of the policymaking process and national agenda setting. The authors’ methodology in this study was to conduct an empirical study examining national policy issues over time and then highlight any notable patterns. In the book, the authors develop a political model to account of long periods of stability in policies where entrenched interests are evident, but also times where policy change happens relatively quickly and seems to favor new avenues of influence.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canada Interest Groups

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Another factor making the political party inferior is its longstanding values, territorial basis restricting it from expansion since political parties aim to accomplish control of legislative. Hence since the legislature is based on a territorial perimeter, the rest of the political party body must follow in this direction. In contrast to some interest groups, political parties have not fully been able to achieve a system which incorporates the public into the policy making process. Pross questioned whether the fragmentation of the political parties endangers long-standing institutions, or if this merely is the politics of the new age. Canada has witnessed the emergence of a new public philosophy “pluralism” started taking the place of the previous representative parliamentary democracy. Pluralism emphasizes the collaboration between government and interest groups. Ideally members of private groups exchange ideas and negotiate with government civil…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, due to a number of reforms passed this route is no longer feasible. Political parties have taken over the means by which members can achieve good public policy, which is ultimately satisfying the parties goal of solving public…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supporters of pressure group would lead this on to say that pressure groups enhance this sense of pluralism in our democracy and make our democratic system much more effective. Although the opposite argument to this is that people claim that many organized groups can undermine the policy making process because they are dominated by people with vested interests concerned only to improve the position of certain groups within society, not the welfare of the whole country. Pressure groups also help to promote democracy because they widen the distribution of political power because pressure groups compete against one another and this ensures that no group can remain on top of all the others, so prevents an elitist situation whereby the ideologies pluralism is completely outcast from the situation. However as one group begins to turn more influential, other groups come into existence to combat them and offer rival viewpoints. Due to this, public policy is created through an ongoing debate between rival groups…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collective Action

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One would expect that a group of people with a common interest would naturally coordinate to exercise their common goal. However, this is generally not the case, as Mancur Olson, the author of The Logic of Collective Action, argues. Olson (2004: 2) states that "it is not in fact true that the idea that groups will act in their self-interest follows logically from the premise of rational and self-interested behavior." Collective action groups, without some sort of coercion or special device to make individual participants act in the interest of the group, will not succeed because "rational, self-interested individuals will not to act to achieve their common or group interests." Not every attempt at collective action has failed, however, and it is these successful cases that require further examination. The government had an impact on many of these cases, and from studying these events we can see that governments can solve collective action problems through the use of incentives and the legislation of coercion.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Childhood Vaccination Policy

    • 4179 Words
    • 17 Pages

    because public policy based upon due process and social consensus can be understood as a norm and rule that defines social relationships, one’s preference for a…

    • 4179 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    group cohesion

    • 1431 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Group cohesion refers to the forces in a group that causes the members to remain in the group and at the same time attracting people from other groups. This can only be possible if the individuals in the group relate well with each other and also by the members respecting the role assigned to each person in the group (Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley, 1958). Cohesion refers to the extent to which the members of a group are attracted by the ideas held by the group. If the ideas orated by the group serve as an advantageous value to each individual, they will find it hard to leave the group. It is important for one to know the factors that affect group cohesion and those that do not. The following are the factors of a workgroup situation that affect cohesiveness (Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley, 1958).…

    • 1431 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper an example of a current event or issue where multiple governments interact on the solution will…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays