Conscientious Objectors Analysis
This week, we had the honor to participate in a speech made by Dr. Maja Zehfuss. Dr. Zehfuss came to give us a lecture on the current problem that is happening between American soldiers and about whether some of the soldiers’ personal willingness is against the requirement of going to Iraq.
The conscientious objectors’ personal opinion can be controversy. First, one of the narratives of the conscientious objection is that these American soldiers are against of serving their term associated with Iraq War. According to the lecture, majority of their reason on why not going to Iraq is because of the brutality the soldiers brought. America’s troops tend to break into Iraq citizen’s place and search for any possibility signs of terrorism in these …show more content…
The other point of view on these conscientious objectors is that, from their action of refusing to go to Iraq has been violating the contract that singed when they joined the armed force. Furthermore, from comparing to the pervious society, the current political circumstances have been changing. I believe that the definition of conscientious objector can be re-defined. With the rising awareness of human rights, soldier’s personal opinion should be considered especially this issue is associated with ethnical and race. The right of the Iraqi who got forced search should also be banned because clearly, this is against human rights.
Also, the personal mental healthy of these soldier is another important thing to address. For example, some soldiers have unpleasant experiences, therefore, those experiences keeps them away from being willing to serve in such intense military front. Actions of forcibly sending soldiers into Iraq might result in the damage of both mental and psychical health, and brings negative impact to the social perception. In my opinion, besides the efficiency of the troops, to strive for an understandable and a humanized armed force system is also very important. Therefore, I believe these criticisms on these “conscientious objector ” should be
The conscientious objectors’ personal opinion can be controversy. First, one of the narratives of the conscientious objection is that these American soldiers are against of serving their term associated with Iraq War. According to the lecture, majority of their reason on why not going to Iraq is because of the brutality the soldiers brought. America’s troops tend to break into Iraq citizen’s place and search for any possibility signs of terrorism in these …show more content…
The other point of view on these conscientious objectors is that, from their action of refusing to go to Iraq has been violating the contract that singed when they joined the armed force. Furthermore, from comparing to the pervious society, the current political circumstances have been changing. I believe that the definition of conscientious objector can be re-defined. With the rising awareness of human rights, soldier’s personal opinion should be considered especially this issue is associated with ethnical and race. The right of the Iraqi who got forced search should also be banned because clearly, this is against human rights.
Also, the personal mental healthy of these soldier is another important thing to address. For example, some soldiers have unpleasant experiences, therefore, those experiences keeps them away from being willing to serve in such intense military front. Actions of forcibly sending soldiers into Iraq might result in the damage of both mental and psychical health, and brings negative impact to the social perception. In my opinion, besides the efficiency of the troops, to strive for an understandable and a humanized armed force system is also very important. Therefore, I believe these criticisms on these “conscientious objector ” should be