Preview

Cons Of Hunting Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
279 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cons Of Hunting Research Paper
Pros of hunting Many people would agree that hunting is cruel and useless. Although I think that there are many benefits of hunting. However, the only time that hunting is not okay is when people just hunt for sport and to show off their skills. The animal that is killed only needs to be killed for a good reason. Hunting is very helpful for the economy but not only because stores sell hunting equipment and from the government selling hunting permits. It is also helpful for hunters because they save money by killing their own food instead of buying it at a grocery store. On page one, the text specifically states that, ”Resident and non-resident hunters have provided over 1.6 billion dollars to our state’s economy”(Lin1). Hunting allows people to save money and to make more money. It is one of the most important benefits of hunting. …show more content…
Eating the wild animals that are killed is actually a lot healthier than other meats that can buy at a grocery store. Mainly because it is all natural and doesn’t have any extra additives put in it for it to last longer. Hunting gives people an opportunity to live a healthier lifestyle. Some hunters give the animal that they’ve killed to someone else in need of food. To conclude, the conflict between the people that approve of hunting and the people that are against hunting will most likely never be resolved. Mainly because the pros of hunting outnumber the cons and people have different opinions, and that’s okay. Hunting is very important to our everyday lives and to our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    That question has been very intelligently addressed in Ted Kerasote 's book called Bloodties. He makes a big a point in his introduction to the book that as long as we hunt locally (so that we don 't burn fossil fuel getting to our quarry) and as long as we eat the victim, we do infinitely less harm to the overall environment than we do by eating ordinary supermarket vegetables. After all, the vegetables are grown by an energy-hungry agribusiness whose pesticides decimate the ecosystem and whose combines fatally batter hundreds of small animals (insects, toads, snakes, ground-nesting birds, mice, voles, woodchucks, striped squirrels, weasels, skunks, foxes) in the course of each harvest. But venison is in dramatic contrast to the vegetables resulting from that harvest, as well as to feed-dependent pork, beef, mutton, chicken and turkey. Unlike agricultural produce, venison requires no pesticide or fossil-fuel to grow, and results in the loss of just one life: the deer 's.9 Why don 't we all see this? Because to many of us, the little animals in the crops are vermin and the deer are Bambi, yet as Kerasote points out, life is precious to all creatures. This point that he makes shows us how deep this animal harm goes, people who are vegans probably do not think this deep. The land cleared for their food was once a home to animals. That same land is annually inhabited by other animals and every year they get killed or chased away by machinery. Kerasote hunts, probably very well. As a hunter he sounds more like an Inuit or a Bushman (or more like a wolf or a mountain lion, to name two other hunters of the deer) than like the camouflage-clad, beer-sodden macho types with automatic weapons who infest the woods each fall. And because he 's a hunter, Kerasote 's descriptions of hunts are realistic…

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personally, I think that the morality of hunting depends on the situation. If the hunter is strictly doing his job of providing food for his family and community, then that is fine. However, if they are doing it for the thrill and for pleasure and they aren't even going to eat what they kill, then these people need to take a moment to step back and realize that what they are doing is in no way right and they are the people giving genuine hunters a poor…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem with offering money is that some ranchers have accepted it, but used that money to pay hunters to kill as many wolves as possible (nytimes, 2011). Ranchers do not believe that it is necessary to keep wolf populations as high as they are (nytimes, 2011). The fourth article discussed how the court was going to uphold Congress’s act to remove the wolf from the endangered species list (latimes, 2012). The main viewpoints are the agencies that support Congress’s decision to take the wolf off the list versus the environmental groups (latimes, 2012). The environmental groups were arguing that the rider that Congress issued in 2011 was a violation of the separation of powers doctrine (latimes, 2012). However, it was revealed that the separation of powers doctrine was not violated and that states should still get the rights to determine wolf population numbers (latimes, 2012). In the fifth article, state governments versus environmental groups are the main viewpoints (nytimes, 2013). State governments believe that they are the most competent to make decisions about the future of wolves (nytimes, 2013). Reports indicate that wolf populations remain…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How do you feel about lions? Do you want them to be extinct? If we continue this type of hunting, every lion that you have ever seen will be gone. Also, this includes tigers, elephants, rhinos, and many more. Big Game Trophy Hunting is a danger to the environment due to population. You might say “Hunting provides food for us,” or “This helps keep the populations under control.” All of this might be true, but populations would even rise more if we kept…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The game commission allows so many licenses per season to be able to hunt certain animals. Each year there is research done to determine the amount of hunting licenses given in each region every year. This research is to help control the population of wild game, if it were not to be controlled vegetation and crops are destroyed by deer and other animals. Wild life population control also helps with auto accidents. In the year of 2000 there was about 1 million car accidents due to animal collisions which lead to 200 human deaths and causing $1.1 billion dollars in property damage. If there is too many deer around the number for car accidents goes up because the population for deer is out of hand. The wild life population needs to be controlled or the number of car accidents will go up and vegetation and crops will be occupied and destroyed by these…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The activity of hunting wild animals for food has long been a practice of man. It is what we as humans survived off for thousands of years. An instinctual need to pursue game is still alive in many of us. Unfortunately, those who choose to fulfill this instinct are generally condemned for their actions. Now this may not seem to be such a serious deal, but I assure you there is much more to this situation than first meets the eye. The topic of hunting is very significant because it not only affects hunter’s rights, but it affects landscape, funding wildlife preservation, and tradition.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    You’re driving home from a movie with your best friends and you’re doing about 60 on a country road you’ve known all your life. All of a sudden, out of your peripheral view, you see a couple of deer heading straight for your cars path. You hit the brake to try to avoid them and narrowly miss. You think to yourself how lucky you are that you didn’t hit one. What you didn’t know is the couple of deer you saw used to be a pack of 4 deer. A week earlier, two different hunters each took a deer from that herd. If it wasn’t for the hunters, you probably would’ve hit at least one deer. Deer hunting isn’t as bad as it is portrayed to be! Hunting controls the deer population and along with predator population and the number of accidents involving deer decrease because of good ethical hunting.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Letter to the Editor

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I feel that mostly everything in the world becomes natural and the natural part is hunting animals, which shouldn’t be done in the first place. Companies such as McDonald’s, Burger King, and KFC use animal meat for their fast-foods and people eat them. Makes me feel that if their eating animals that have flesh n blood, then why not eat humans because technically humans are also meat. So why not just eat yourself then?…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion hunting should continue to be allowed because without it, the animal population would get overpopulated, and also it provides food for families. If hunting becomes illegal or even more regulated, some animal populations would sky rocket and a lot of the hunting community would get…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sport hunting is a topic that is highly debated in the US today. People have many different opinions on whether it should be illegal, or remain the same. I believe that sport hunting is unfair, not right, and should be illegal.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Hunting Essay

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Public debates about trophy hunting often centers on the question of the morality of recreational hunting or the extent to which the money paid by sportsmen seeking a trophy animal provides a conservation benefit to the overall population of game animals and the rural economies where the game is hunted. Bears, cougars, deer, foxes, and other animals who are chased, trapped, and even killed by dogs during hunts are not the only ones to suffer from this variant of the “sport.” Hunting for fun destroys property and injure or kill horses, cows, dogs, cats, hikers, and other hunters (Trophy…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many majestic animals have been the targets for poachers, and poachers, being the dumb people they are, don’t know the difference between animals they can and can’t hunt, and end up making them extinct! Hunting is interfering with nature, and at this rate, we will continue to make many species extinct! Some may see hunting as a way of removing overpopulated animals, but there are none of those right now! Hunting not only hurts animals, but it will end up hurting ourselves as well!…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    All animals should have the right to roam freely without being pursued and/or killed. Hunters cause injuries, pain and suffering to defenseless animals, they destroy their families and home, and leave…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Benefits Of Hunting

    • 2943 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Hunting is a practice which has thrived through the centuries from the beginning of man to modern day civilizations. When the first colonists sailed to these lands and established the America that we know today, hunting was a skill they needed to master very quickly in order to survive. Since that time, hunting has sprouted a multi-billion dollar industry, fueled by millions of Americans who continue the tradition. Hunting has emerged as an outdoor sport, enjoyed by many. Like all sports, hunting has its brands, idols, and traditions. It has its rules and regulations, and penalties for not following them. Yet, unlike most other sports, hunting has a significant opposition from millions of people and groups across the nation. It’s argued that…

    • 2943 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hunters obey the laws enacted to protect the animals including game and non game animals. Hunters respect the animal they are hunting. It is fair chase and the animal becomes food for the Hunter and his/her family. Like it or not, we by nature are predators. AS of nowhunters, are the most efficient way to keep animal population under control. Since we have intruded into the animals area, there is less room and natural food for large populations. Larger populations means disease and hunger. Poachers kill animals illegally. They do not obey the laws. They kill for profit because some PEOPLE like to buy the tusk, furs, etc of non game and protected animals. Don't put the blame on Hunters, but the buisness owners that finance the Poachers with their illegal…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays