Preview

Conquerors In Western Civilization

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
847 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conquerors In Western Civilization
Since the beginnings of civilization there has always been a desire to expand and build empires throughout the world. Because of this there will always be conquerors and conquered people. The conquered are subjected to different treatments by different conquerors; this depends on who the triumphant are. Different examples of these subjugations include that of those ruled by Egyptians, Persians, Greeks, and the Hellenistic monarchs. These types of regimes laid the groundwork for that of the Romans who took pieces of each of these past civilizations and implemented it in their own system which eventually would grow into the foundation for Western Civilization. The Egyptians conquered Nubia during the Middle Kingdom period (Sherman, 21). …show more content…
After this defeat, the Spartans left some troops in Athens, knocked down Athenian walls, and reduced the Athenian naval fleet but overall, according to Spartan allies, were very lenient towards Athens (Sherman, 71). When Alexander rose to power in later years he came across many conquered lands due to his everlasting need to explore and expand. Alexander treated the people he conquered very fairly. He had a dream of a unified people, to conquer in all aspect, not only politically and militarily but also culturally and economically (Sherman, 83). He did this by blending the cultures of the Greeks and Macedonians with the people under his control (Sherman, 83). Among his implementations, Alexander accepted foreigners into the military, allowed, and even encouraged, intermarriages and generally treated his people with dignity and respect (Sherman, 83). Both sides were happy with this style of rule, Alexander acquired land and culturally dominated while defeated territories were able to live the life they already had without be abused or dominated. Alexander’s idea of unity would be the main predecessor of the methods used by Rome and Western Civilization in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After Alexander’s death, unfortunately the powerful and mighty empire he built up, rapidly declined. But in these remains, were left people of various races and cultures. Even though Alexander’s premature death was devastating it set the groundwork for a new era that is now known as the Hellenistic Age. During the Hellenistic Age, Alexander was responsible for most of Eurasia’s cultural development and diffusion. There were many advancements made during this era, some regarding medicine, military, and math & mechanical sciences.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Early Roman Empires DBQ

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the early Roman, Macedonian, and Persian Empires, the government, laws, and economy were major influences in gaining authority over conquered lands.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 326 BCE, Alexander the Great conquered the Near East. After the conquest, Hellenism gradually spread in the area. It was the Alexander's intentional attempt to inculcate the Greek beliefs and culture in to minds of people throughout the world. According to the historians, Alexander the Great was the most arrogant king and warrior, who was in the view that Greek culture had the potential to influence any other culture in the world, and every nation could benefit from its universality.…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the Persian Emperor Paries lll, was brightly intelligent and his army outnumbered Alexander’s. By surprise Alexander denied the offer from Emperor to surrender all the Persian Empire west of Euphrates, and proceeded to invade the rest of Persia. Alexander mind was set on one thing only; that was to conquer the entire empire, which was just what he did. Persian grew a massive love for Alexander once the made the attempt to merge the Greek and Persian cultures, but they we’re both holding important positions. By doing so this caused him a lot of hardship once he begins to rule the former Persian Empire. Even though he adopted the Persians ways of governing; while keeping the Greek cultural ways. Alexander looked to create a new-found life with the empire, but not to exclude, but those in Greece started to resent him while the was away in Persia. The attention that Alexander showed the Persians, made those in Greece feel jealous a d the citizens began to…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexanders respect of other people's beliefs was one of the biggest reasons he is considered great. While other conquerors in this time period, like the persians, would try to destroy and get rid of other people's cultures Alexander would study and learn from them. He did this to such an extent in Egypt that they even referred to him as a god and pharaoh. In other places he would study their beliefs, and try to understand them as a people, and he may have been doing this to learn how to control them, but based on his character it is more likely that he did it so learn how to respect them.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was able to do all of this at the young age of thirty-three years old. The Hellenistic Culture blended Greek Culture with Cultures that he saw while conquering new lands. Alexander made an effort to bring people from different cultures and places together. He did this many ways.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plus a lot l engineers, shipbuilders, doctors, and scholars. And Aristotle’s nephew, came along as well. Alexander wanted revenge on the Persians after the destruction of Athens, Greece. He was going to destroy the whole Persian Empire and promised the Greek soldiers who had joined that he would liberate all the Greeks there.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He had the courage and the will to do what no other king has done.His courage contributed greatly to his success hence the name, Alexander The Great. In the Background Essay, it claims that Alexander set off to conquer Persia almost right after he inherited the throne. Most people might think that he was stupid and that he was a madman to try and achieve that. But he did it, he took down the Persian army. Alexander The Great’s legacy spread Hellenization throughout the known world at the time. Hellenization is the spread of Greek culture and language, culture and population. It took a lot of courage and self esteem to be able to spread the Greek language among the conquered lands because he didn’t know if the people would hate it or not be he did it anyway. He could have faced rejection. At the end of it all, Alexander had courage like no other…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Dbq

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “I came, I saw, I conquered” stated by Julius Caesar is one of the most well-known quotes in history. Neither Western Civilization nor the Roman Empire can be discussed without making reference to this great leader. Being a leader, Julius Caesar was continuously faced with obstacles but how he overcame them and impacted society, centuries later, is what mattered. From his personal endeavors into the political leadership role that he excelled at, Caesar got what he wanted out of any situation and was extremely influential. From Rome to Egypt and back again, Caesar never allowed for his way of thinking to be compromised and that, in turn, allowed for him to impact certain things in Western Civilization and history…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At last, Alexander the Great was a standout amongst the most-known individuals in Greek history to have vanquished a ton of land. It helped him spread his way of life, however it restricted the choices of other urban communities' way of life. In this way, it was useful for Greece, awful for the Near East urban communities. On the off chance that Alexander didn't vanquish so much, significantly more things could have been distinctive and there could've perhaps been significantly more societies now. Alexander the Great was a progressive and he exclusively changed…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The start of western culture came with the Greeks, and Alexander made it achieve global dominance by spreading it throughout the vast empire that he formed. He introduced the notion that the government should be for everyone, no just the wealthy. He is also considered to be a pioneer in urban planning and established around twenty cities, such as Alexandria, that became important trade centers and locations of many cultures. The local culture was further changed by Alexander's Greek-influenced city planning techniques, which established towns with a central market square, school, offices, shops, a public theater, and gym. It was changes such as these that led to the Hellenistic period of Greece after the death of Alexander, which is marked with increasing urbanization. His empire contained many cultures because he allowed the nations he conquered to practice any religion they wanted. He also incorporated some of the ideas of other nation into Greek culture making it stronger and…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One Spanish official remarked that “the maxim of the conqueror must be to settle.” Explain what you think he meant by this statement. Illustrate the various ways conquerors settled the New World, commenting on what worked, what did not work, and the consequences of those methods…

    • 1484 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fact, Alexander the Great adapted a very unique strategy to control and convince conquered people-assimilation. A the same time the Hellenization went, Alexander also respected certain regional custom of conquered areas. Such intolerance of different cultures created a sense of belonging for conquered people, so they would satisfy with their current lives and maintained the hegemony. For instance, different from Ashoka, who interrelated to other religions, Alexander the Great actually was very open to different cultures since he hoped to mix Macedonians, Greeks and conquered people into one larger group. He wore Persian clothing, encouraged intermarriage(even his wife was a Persian princess), respecting religions of conquered people, and even punished Macedonians who mistreated native populations (Lecture 8). His intolerance to other cultures worked and conquered people had less ambitious to take against him. His achievement was proved and appreciated by Plutarch, a Greek writer. Plutarch recorded that Alexander “strove to acquire the goodwill of the conquered by showing respect for their apparel, so that they might continue constant in loving the Macedonians as rulers, and might not feel hate toward them as enemies” (Plutarch on Alexander and Hellenization, p111). Therefore, Alexander the Great successfully controlled conquered people and maintained the peace through assimilation until his death.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Near the end of the nineteenth century, there was a sharp increase in the need for people of Western civilization to expand their way of life across the globe. Colonization had begun in the 1600s as a method of economic gain for European countries. The reasons for expansion in the late nineteenth century, however, had deviated from only economical prosperity. The notion that evolution as well as the belief in their racial and cultural superiority caused many white Europeans and Americans to assume that they, as a people, had the right and were destined to dominate the world and thus served as one of the central justifications for imperialism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Two Sides of Imperialism

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Imperialism in the 19th and 20th centuries began crumbling at its foundations. Small enclaves of ethnic and nationalist groups sprouted throughout their native countryside, binding their people together to rise against their enemies and oppressors. The thought of independence from the foreign rulers, from the class system they set up, and from the atrocities they committed to gain control of the land was more than enough to motivate the fellow countrymen to take action. The foreigners, however, stood confused, wondering how such a great colony turned into such a massive conflict. The seeds of oppression and cruelty were sown year after year, and finally bore fruit. What these foreigners didn’t consider, however, was that there are many ways of creating an empire. The Roman Empire’s standard of conglomeration is a better method of imperialism than the exploitative approach employed by 19th century nations.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays