Preview

Conflicting Perspectives

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1056 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conflicting Perspectives
To what extent has textual form shaped your understanding of conflicting perspectives?
In your response, make detailed reference to your prescribed text and at least ONE other related text of your own choosing.
Interpretations are merely influenced by one’s personal beliefs, experiences and the way the situation is presented. William Shakespeare’s play, “Julius Caesar”, and David Deane’s news article, “Cop’s Visa Denied over Autistic Daughter”, present these interpretations by cleverly embedding the thoughts of different parties, and where these thoughts are stemmed from. Shakespeare’s conversion of Plutarch’s histories into a play exposes the responder to a visual interpretation of Julius Caesar’s event, and Deane’s article allows the text to be presented in a more authorative and formal approach to the readers. The expression of emotions and stage directions depicted within the play provides more depth to revealing the true intentions and nature of a character, whereas the news article simply persuades the audience through the structural official form of the text, presenting the information as objective and factual, rather than personal opinions.
Both texts portray a character neglecting their private feelings and loyalties in favour of protecting and supporting the future of the public. The play characterises Brutus as a noble Roman, genuinely loving Julius Caesar, yet ironically murdering him, afraid from handing power to a tyrant. Shakespeare hides this irony through his emotional statement “Any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’s love to Caesar was no less than his… not that I loved Caesar less, but I love Rome more”. His nobility is depicted through Shakespeare’s clever use of repeating the word ‘loved’ within the contrast of Caesar and Rome, providing an affectionate outlook towards Brutus, and also by using third person instead of first, as it presents a selfless impression. Antony’s view of Brutus is betrayal, killing a close friend

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Justice Game

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In your response, make detailed reference to your prescribed text and at least ONE other related text of your own choosing.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In your response, make detailed reference to your prescribed text and one other text of your own choosing.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to literature, conflicting perspectives are often woven artfully through the fabric of the text. The Shakespearean tragedy ‘Julius Caesar’ and Rob Sitch’s film ‘The Castle’ are two such pieces of literature that examine a range of conflicting perspectives. Humans are innately biased and self-interested, and it is our inability to separate a situation from bias and self-interest that often results in conflicting perspectives. Both composers explore this concept through the use of a variety of poetic, dramatic and cinematic devices.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflicting Perspectives

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “An important outcome of studying this elective is the realisation that all representations of perspectives are designed to provoke an intended response.”…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    History and Memory

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In your response, make detailed reference to your prescribed text and at least ONE other related text.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflicting Perspectives

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The innate human obsession with the “truth” and the persistent search for it, poses the question: Does one truth really exist, or does the truth depend on one’s perspective? The relationship between truth and perspectives is a key concept in Ted Hughes’ Birthday Letters, this idea is supported in the film Vantage Point and the Scientific American’s report on the social perspectives of the death of Bin Laden, “What Bin Laden’s death means to us and society?” Essentially Vantage Point is a film about one event seen through eight different perspectives. As each perspective is revealed, more about the event is understood. There is no one single perspective that reveals the “truth” it is only through the evaluation of all eight perspectives a conclusion can be made. While all eight individuals will believe there perspective is the truth, one perspective in isolation lacks vital context. When read together with “what does Bin Larden’s death mean to society?” the two reaffirm the concept that the truth can only be found through the assessment of conflicting perspectives, as well as showing that influences such as point of view, personal history and morals alter one’s overall perspective.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secret River

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In your answer refer to your prescribed text and at least ONE other related text of your own choosing…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus’s genuine heart causes him to make the decisions he does throughout the play. Brutus was not originally for killing Caesar, as Caesar was a dear friend and close ally to him. After some distressed letters from the “people of Rome” arrive at Brutus’ study, he decides that he has “no personal cause to spurn at him, but for the general.” (II.i.11-12) He decides that because the people of Rome feared Caesar’s rise to power, he must do something to stop it from occurring. His distinction and genuine intentions cause him to look out for the people's’ best interest. Later on, when Brutus is conversing with the fellow conspirators, Cassius suggests the murder of Mark Antony as well. Brutus rejects this idea, saying “Antony is but a limb of Caesar” and “Let’s be sacrificers, but not butchers, Caius.”(II.i.178-179) Brutus explains that Antony will be nothing without Caesar to ease Cassius’s perspective, but also killing Antony will turn their noble cause into a murder spree. Brutus, unlike Cassius and the others, sincerely believes that he is helping with Caesar’s murder for the people’s good. Therefore, Brutus was a true and honorable roman up until his death, as Antony states in his…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    n Act III, Scene ii. of Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar Brutus and Antony are presenting speeches to the Roman plebeians to convince them of their position regarding Caesar’s assassination.They both believe differently Antony manages stealthily bring it to the opinion that Caesar has been killed wrongfully.He begins by insisting that Brutus and the other murderers are honorable but then slowly undermines this idea by pointing out that Caesar's ambition could not be true. How Caesar loved his people.Brutus thinks that Caesar threatened to take away the freedom of the Plebeians and if allowed to live he would have turned them all into slaves.The theme in the play is the power of language.Antony's speech is superior and has more rhetorically…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brutus: A Tragic Hero By Chad Gingery In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Brutus is a tragic hero for he was easily manipulated, naive and patriotic. Brutus believed that the Romans wanted him as the leader to assassinate Caesar, because of the forged notes that were sent to him by Cassius. The note explained how to assassinate Caesar by Speaking, Striking and Redressing. This note by Cassius caused Brutus to be manipulated into joining the conspirators, one of many flaws that leads to the downfall of Brutus and the assassination of Caesar. Brutus' trusting attitude toward Antony is an example of one of his flaws. Brutus allowed Antony to give a funeral speech for Julius Caesar and to be sure not to speak negatively about the conspiracy. This resulted in Antony leading a mob against the conspirators, Revenge!, About!, Seek!, Burn!, Fire!, Kill!, Slay!, Let not a traitor live.!(3.2.216). From this powerful speech and Brutus' naïveté, Antony became his nemesis, an event that would ultimately lead to Brutus' downfall. Brutus had an overabundance of love for his country which blinded him to the truth. Brutus had said in one of his soliloquies, If then that a friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. Brutus had honored Caesar but Brutus felt that Caesar was too ambitious. Brutus also felt that Caesar made the Romans as slaves. Brutus was a patriotic man who did not see past his patriotism, to see the exploitation of his comrades. Brutus was noble in how he was benevolent towards his fellow man, but this nobility was a negative component that led to his inevitable loss of nobility. Brutus had many errors in his plans in Julius Caesar; one of those errors was an exorbitant amount of love for Rome. Tragedy is when a person is deprived of something loved. Brutus had been deprived of his nobility. Brutus was a tragic hero because of his trusting, obedient personality and his…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In your response, refer to your prescribed text and at least one other related text of your own choosing.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Conflicting perspectives are the direct result of bias or self-interest as people are always quick to enforce the correctness of their perspective over those of others, by contrasting their perspectives with others, they seek to advantage their own point of view opposed to the viewpoints of others. Conflicting perspectives are caused by bias, or prejudice, and self-interest from a person, event or situation that is encountered. William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Philadelphia (1993), written by Ron Nyswaner and directed by Jonathan Demme, are both prime examples of when bias and self-interest lead to conflicting perspectives in society. More than anything else, conflicting perspectives are the immediate result of bias or self-interest as the emplify the rise of self in society.…

    • 2407 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Shakespeare’s ironic play Julius Caesar (1599) and James Cameron’s film Avatar (2009) similarly display conflicting perspectives as a result of self-interest. Shakespeare develops a contemporary context, representing the fears of 16th Century England to display his views on creating an ethical society. Correspondingly, Cameron displays his own representation of a dying world and the self-interest which plays the foremost part in destroying it. Each text provides a representation of the self-interest of the composer toward developing an equal, just and unselfish word. The representation of these perspectives are emphasised to express the conflicting values that influence the response of humanity towards personalities, situations and events.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Lawson

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Make detailed reference to your prescribed text and at least one other related text of your own choice.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflicting Perspectives

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How is the representation of conflicting perspectives an integral part of the texts you have studied?…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays