Preview

Conflict Theory Vs Structural Functional Theory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
203 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conflict Theory Vs Structural Functional Theory
Conflict Theory and Structural Functional Theory are both theories of social change. They conceive society as an organism characterized by a fair degree of stability. Their parts are postulated to "hang together" in a system of functional interdependence, much like a human body or a relatively smooth-running engine.While different theorists have different positions regarding change, all of them claim that both are theories of social change and capable of altering the fundamental structure of society.

To contrast the two theories, Conflict Theory is attributed to Karl Marx, a German sociologist. Conflict is not random but rather is a systematic product of the structure of society itself. According to Marx there is no social change without
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unit 3 Theoretical Perspectives Essay
    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Unit 3 Theoretical Perspectives Essay

    Three theoretical perspectives are functionalism, conflict theory, and the insurrectionist perspective, which help serve as a means of helping frame research. Functionalism, also known as structural functionalism, sees society as a complex network working together in balance. Those who study functionalism examin society by contemplating what each separate part of the network does to help society work in harmony. Functionalist view society as a well-functioning self-sufficient machine. The functionalism theory is very broad in that it tries to explain all the parts of human society . Functionalism serves a very important part in sociology because most sections of society have a purpose in the network. The explanation for social change is challenging for functionalist because of “The assumption…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lopez Family At The Macro Level
    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lopez Family At The Macro Level

    Conflict theory was first brought up by Karl Marx, he noticed the deviation between the poor and the rich. His theory was that history was driven by a constant conflict between the poor and the rich. He believed that the wealth should be divided equally between the two (RESOURCE). Marx argued that the rich individuals use their power to exploit the poor; as a result, the poor had a constant conflict with each other over resources, including money, jobs, and housing. Power unequally divided, and some powerful individuals take advantage of others.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sociological Theories Response Paper
    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sociological Theories Response Paper

    The Social conflict theory is known as society as a whole always battling for what is…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theory Explanation Of Conflict Theory
    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page

    Theory Explanation Of Conflict Theory

    Conflict, rather than being a disruption in the normal state state of affairs, conflict is the normal state of…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Functionalist Perspective On America's Education In The United States
    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Functionalist Perspective On America's Education In The United States

    Contradicting this perspective, our next outlook on society is categorized by conflicting views rather than unanimity. This is referred to as conflict theory, where societal norms and standards are not equally shared or accepted among the members of society. Karl Marx is a sociologist who implemented this theory of social conflict, to which it is now coined Marxism. Marx believes that there is conflict between various groups and that society is highly structured. These structures form a hierarchical compartmentalization of groups and with that, comes…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    cheat sheet
    • 1437 Words
    • 5 Pages

    cheat sheet

    Response: Conflict theory and structural functionalism are similar in a sense where everyone can agree that someone or group has more money or power in a society. They are similar in ideas of a structured society. Where they are different is where is stems from the problem of inequality conflict theory is the notion of when people feel that a certain…

    • 1437 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Conflict Perspective Analysis
    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Conflict Perspective Analysis

    Functionalist, conflict, and interactionist perspectives are all similar in the fact that they are different ways of analyzing sociology. The functionalist perspective is a positive method of analyzing a society and the individuals that work together in order for the society to fucntion properly. For example, a person has multiple body systems and each system must work together in order for the body to function properly. On the other hand, the conflict perspective focuses on individual's behaviors and the factors that may contribute to their behaviors or actions. Conflict focuses on the different classes in a society and the struggles the society may face. I feel that the functionalist and conflict theories are very different in the aspect that one view focuses on a society functioning properly and the other focuses on the differences and struggles of the society. I feel that the interactionist theory fits in the middle of the functionalist and conflict theory. This is due to the fact that the interactionist perspective focuses on the individuals and the individual's understanding or rationalization of certain categories. I feel that the interactionist theory does not label, it is a way of learning and understanding individuals based on their definition of things. Overall, all three views focus on analyzing socioloigy, but i feel that each theory is very different in the approaches and methods that are…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Conflict Theory And Its Effects On Australian Society
    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Conflict Theory And Its Effects On Australian Society

    Conflict theory is the presentation of deferent group competing for resources. In addition, the ruling clast remain dominant over other class. As a result, it impacts lifestyle in society (Bartons, Otomar J,2002). Conflict theory was founded by Karl Marx in the (date) (Omer, S Jabeen, S 2016).…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Why Karl Marx Did Not Believe In God
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain Why Karl Marx Did Not Believe In God

    Karl Marx did not believe in god. He was well known for his ideas about alienation. He believed everyone was born with a creative spirit, i.e. species being. Conflict is to fight or to battle, Karl Marx was the founder of conflict theory, according to sources conflict theory argues that the competition of groups and individuals for power and wealth is a fundamental process shaping the social structure. Conflict is manifested through Marx by who gets what and why, Marx argued that the labor market was shaped…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sociology
    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sociology

    Compare and contrast conflict theory with structural functionalism. Pay special attention to the way that each theory treats the origin of social change. When it comes to the origin of social change the conflict theory and structural functionalism differ in many ways. Structural Functionalism stresses that society as whole, including the individuals, families, educational system, politics, and the economy come together to create a functioning society. But, if any one part of these social institutions experiences dysfunction then the whole society pays a price as if it were a domino effect. For example, if families fail to discipline their children, schools, churches and the courts must take up the slack. In the end, whether it is a positive or negative change, the society as a whole must adjust in response to a transformation in a social institution. Conflict theory does not see society as a whole coming together well for one purpose. The conflict theory proposes that conflict and tension are the basic facts of life and are what make up social change and ultimately society as a whole, but it puts more emphasis on class conflict (bourgeoisie vs. proletariat). Together, both of these theories are from a macro analysis perspective.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction of Sociology
    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Introduction of Sociology

    * Conflict Theory: conflict theorists stress that society is composed of group that are competing with one another for scarce resources. However, with the example about Feminist, the conflict perspective shows that women are more powerful in making headway in their historical struggle with men.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    American Dream
    • 4389 Words
    • 18 Pages

    American Dream

    The Conflict Theory is one of the major sociological models for understanding the social world. The Conflict Theory…

    • 4389 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx's Conflict Theory
    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page

    Karl Marx's Conflict Theory

    The Conflict theory has been criticized for its focus on change and neglect of social stability as the change is very little compare to the social stability.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Structural Functionalism and Conflict Theory
    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Structural Functionalism and Conflict Theory

    Karl Marx and Max Weber were the first conflict theorists in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Following Marx and Weber were three mid-20th century conflict theorists: Lewis Coser, Ralf Dahrendorf, and Randall Collins. Coser draws his theoretical ideas from Simmel. Like Simmel, Coser maintains that conflict is healthy for society. In contrast, Dahrendorf combines theoretical ideas from Marx and Weber. Dahrendorf sees power as the main feature in all social relationships. However, Collins incorporates Weber, Durkheim, and Goffman’s theories to provide a micro-level orientation to conflict theory. Collins also used geopolitics at a global level to examine political conflicts historically and geographically.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Conflict Theory And Functionalism
    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similarities Between Conflict Theory And Functionalism

    Conflict theory and functionalism are two different theoretical perspectives that sociologists can have that allows them to make sense of a sociological event. Conflict theory is the idea that an individual or a group competes against others in society to obtain the greatest benefit. As a result of this competition, society is unstable due to the consistent change that occurs from conflict and inequality among groups. Functionalism can be thought of as the opposite of conflict theory because functionalists view society as a system that works together through cooperation and equality. This system is composed of many different parts that work together in order to keep society stable and functioning.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics