Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops

Topics: Denial-of-service attack, Intrusion detection system, Cloud computing Pages: 10 (3310 words) Published: May 19, 2012
2010 39th International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops

A Cooperative Intrusion Detection System Framework for Cloud Computing Networks

Chi-Chun Lo
Institute of Information Management National Chiao Tung University Hsinchu, Taiwan cclo@faculty.nctu.edu.tw

Chun-Chieh Huang
Institute of Information Management National Chiao Tung University Hsinchu, Taiwan chuchieh.iim91g@nctu.edu.tw

Joy Ku
Institute of Information Management National Chiao Tung University Hsinchu, Taiwan joyku@iim.nctu.edu.tw

Abstract—Cloud computing provides a framework for supporting end users easily attaching powerful services and applications through Internet. To provide secure and reliable services in cloud computing environment is an important issue. One of the security issues is how to reduce the impact of denialof-service (DoS) attack or distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) in this environment. To counter these kinds of attacks, a framework of cooperative intrusion detection system (IDS) is proposed. The proposed system could reduce the impact of these kinds of attacks. To provide such ability, IDSs in the cloud computing regions exchange their alerts with each other. In the system, each of IDSs has a cooperative agent used to compute and determine whether to accept the alerts sent from other IDSs or not. By this way, IDSs could avoid the same type of attack happening. The implementation results indicate that the proposed system could resist DoS attack. Moreover, by comparison, the proposed cooperative IDS system only increases little computation effort compared with pure Snort based IDS but prevents the system from single point of failure attack. Keywords-cloud computing; denial-of-service attack; distributed denial-of-service attack; cooperative intrusion detection system

I.

INTRODUCTION

Cloud computing has evolved through a number of implementations. Moving data into the cloud provides great convenience to users. Cloud computing is a collection of all resources to enable resource sharing in terms of scalable infrastructures, middleware and application development platforms, and value-added business applications [1][7]. The characteristics of cloud computing includes: virtual, scalable, efficient, and flexible. In cloud computing, three kinds of services are provided: Software as a Service (SaaS) systems, Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) providers, and Platform as a Service (PaaS). In SaaS, systems offer complete online applications that can be directly executed by their users; In IaaS, providers allow their customers to have access to entire virtual machines; and in SaaS, it offers development and deployment tools, languages and APIs used to build, deploy and run applications in the cloud. The virtual environment 1530-2016/10 $26.00 © 2010 IEEE DOI 10.1109/ICPPW.2010.46 280 285

lets users use computing power which far exceeds that contained in their physical worlds. These services in cloud computing may easily expose to the risk of security attacks. Within the cloud computing, security issues, such as confidentiality, integrity and availability (CIA) are the most important security considerations. Denial-of-service (DoS) attack and distributed denial-of-attack (DDoS) are other kinds of attacks that cause the targeted system or network unusable. Therefore, if the cloud computing framework suffers from these kinds of attacks, the service providers and users could not use the services. Intrusion detection system (IDS) is a practical solution to resist these kinds of attacks. However, if IDS is deployed in each cloud computing region, but without any cooperation and communication, IDS may easily suffers from single point of failure attack. Obviously, the abilities of intrusion detection and response are decreased significantly. Thus, the cloud environment could not support services continually. In order to protect the cloud environment from DoS or DDoS attacks, the proposed paper launches an idea of...

References: Figure. 3 Simulation results
[1]
[2]
B.R. Kandukuri, R. Paturi V, and A. Rakshit, “Cloud Security Issues,” 2009 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, Sep. 21-25, 2009, Bangalore, India, pp. 517-520. D. Curry and H.Debar, “Intrusion Detection Message Exchange Format Data Model and Extensible Markup Language (XML)
283 288
Document Type Definition,” draft-ietf-idwg-idmef-xml-06.txt, Feb. 2002. [3] D.J. Ragsdale, C.A. Carver, Jr. J.W. Humphries, U.W. Pooch, “Adaptation techniques for intrusion detection and intrusion response systems,” 2000 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol.4 , 8-11 Oct. 2000 p.2344-p.2349. [4] E.H, Spafford and D. Zamboni, “Intrusion Detection Using Autonomous Agent,” Computer Networks, vol.34, issue 4, 2000, pp.547-570. [5] G. Carl, G. Kesidis, R.R, Brooks, and S. Rai, “Denial-of-serive attack-detection techniques,” IEEE Transaction on Internet Computing, Vol.10, issue 1, 2006, pp.82-89. [6] J. Haggerty, S. Qi, and M. Merabti, “Early detection and prevention of denial-of-service attacks: a novel mechanism with propagated traced-back attack blocking,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol.23, Issue 10, Oct.2005, pp.1994-2002. [7] L.J. Zhang and Qun Zhou, “CCOA: Cloud Computing Open Architecture,” 2009 IEEE International Conference on Web Services, July 6-10, 2009, Los Angeles, CA, USA, pp. 607-616. [8] M.H., Islam, K. Nadeem, S.A., Khan, “Efficient placement of sensors for detection against distributed denial of service attack,” International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology, 2008, 16-18 Dec. 2008, pp.653-657. [9] R. Martin, “Snort – Light Weight Intrusion Detection for Networks,” http://www.snort.org. [10] S. Cheung, R. Crawford, and M. Dilger et al., “The Design of GrIDS: A Graph-Based Intrusion Detection System,” Technical Report CSE99-2, U.C. Davis Computer Science Department, January 1999. [11] S.R. Snapp, J. Brentano, G.V. Dias, T.L. Goan, T. Grance, L.T. Heberlein, C.L. Ho, K.N. Levitt, B. Mukherjee, D.L. Mansur, K.L. Pon, and S.E. Smaha, “A system for distributed intrusion detection,” Compcon Spring’91, Feb-March 1991, pp.170-176.
284 289
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Workshop Essay
  • conference and banqueting Essay
  • workshop tools and safety precautions Essay
  • Essay about Conference
  • workshop Essay
  • Essay about Conference
  • workshop Essay
  • Compare and Contrast the Information Processing Approach, the Parallel Distributed Processing Model, the Levels of Processing Model, and the...

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free