Preview

Confederate Involvement In Ww2

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1525 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Confederate Involvement In Ww2
Intro
The Confederates actively sought European support throughout the war. Many Southerners believed that foreign dependence on cotton imports would force world leaders to join the fight against the North. Union leaders wanted to avoid foreign intervention and attempted to make the southern government appear illegitimate.
Under General Winfield Scott’s Anaconda Plan, the Union formed a naval blockade in 1861 in an attempt to deplete Confederate resources, block the importation of weapons, and prevent cotton from leaving southern ports. The people of the South saw the blockade as an opportunity for Europeans to officially declare their loyalty in order to maintain trade connections. Because of Confederate military failures and the South’s connection to slavery, European powers never recognized the legitimacy of the Confederacy.
Blockade
The Secretary of the Navy, Gideon Welles, suggested creating an undeclared blockade. This would ensure that other nations could not grant the South “belligerent status.” Instead of following this course of action,
…show more content…
Once, the Union had regained its full strength, world powers were directly affected. Emperor Napoleon III was forced to end his plan to conquer Mexico. The threat of the US trying to expand to the North pushed the Canadian provinces to form a united front and formally become one nation. Also, due to the reputation of the Union during the war, Secretary Seward was able to purchase Alaska from the Russian government. Lastly, the defeat of the South inspired a wave of international abolition. The Dutch, Spanish, and Brazilian governments took steps to abolish slavery in their territories. Ultimately, Union interactions with foreign powers during the Civil War set a precedent for all future diplomatic relations between the United States and the rest of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fort Fisher History

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Originally, the mouth of the Cape Fear River gave way to the last of the South’s open trade ports. The port was a travel and trade way for supplies being used by the Confederates during the Civil War. Typically, blockade-runners were the main cargo ships travelling in and out of the port. Blockade-runners are ships that were generally lightly armed and/or armored. Because of their risky operations, adventures, and evasion of naval ships, other defensive ships and boats were not hesitant to fire on them upon…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to the confederate attack on Fort Sumner, the General in Chief Winfield Scott, proposed his idea which he called the Anaconda Plan. The general idea was that the Federal government would use the Navy to block all the major southern ports such as New Orleans and Charleston. This blockade would be a method in which the government could supposedly quickly regain the submission of the southern states. The next part of the plan was for the Northern troops to take control of the Mississippi River to divide the southern states in half. The last major point of Steward’s plan was to march from the Tennessee Valley to the coast of Georgia. There were those who opposed the plan believing it was too slow and that enforcing a blockade would…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several southern states formed the Confederate States of America as a rival nation in response of the attempt to set slaves free, which led to the American Civil War between the North and South. After years of turmoil, the North eventually defeated the South when the Confederate forces surrendered on April 9, 1865. This war was a period of unrest and division in America, but Abraham Lincoln was able to lead the country back into unity with his…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southerners believed they could use cotton to lure England and France into recognizing the Confederacy. Although the Confederate Congress never formally approved an embargo, the state governments and private citizens voluntarily withheld the crop from the market in hopes of causing a "cotton famine" overseas. Theoretically, widespread shortages would shut down European mills, forcing governments to recognize and perhaps come to the military aid of the…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The American Civil War is known as one of the most devastating wars in American history; however, it is also the time that held one of the most breathtaking feats that could have altered the course of the war: Abraham Lincoln and his policy makers avoiding European intervention in the Civil War, which would have led to a Southern victory. Trade has always been established between the U.S. and European nations with their dependence on cotton; however, this investigation will further enhance how Lincoln and his team were able to influence European nations to not give recognition to the Confederacy throughout…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fort Fisher Research Paper

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the Civil War, ports were extremely important for the survival of the South. The South had an agricultural economy and since they were growing cotton instead of food, the ports helped them to receive the other goods necessary to live. The North realized this and would slowly choke the South’s waterways, blocking the ports using the Anaconda Plan by General-in-chief Winfield Scott. However, Wilmington’s port would remain open…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ironclad

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the North's first acts at the outset of the Civil War was the attempt to force the Confederacy into submission by blockading its ports. The objective was to deny the South access to supplies and to shut down its export of cotton to England - its major source of revenue. To counter this threat, the Confederacy began to build a fleet of ships clothed in iron panels that made them impervious to enemy cannon fire. Armed with an underwater ram, these ships were designed to slam into and sink the enemy's wooden vessels.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anaconda plan, proposed by General-in-Chief Winfield Scott, was strategically simplistic and of course tactically difficult to implement. It included controlling the Mississippi (which would split the Confederacy) and blockading the South to prevent exports (which would be used to pay for weapons). The main southern strategy was to defeat the attacking Union forces and force the northern states to negotiate. Later in the war, a slightly altered strategy was to take a major northern city, in order to force the north to negotiate terms favorable to the south. This led to the Battle of…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The plan worked most of the time, except for the fact that the confederates had fewer ships called blockade runners. Most of these ships got through the blockade. If they did they make it through they made lots of money. The Union Navy captured or destroyed 1500 blockade runners. The blockade covered 3500 miles and 180 ports. Most Union soldiers were white from ages 14 to 45. Most Confederate soldiers were under 30. More than half the Confederate soldiers were farmers. Almost half of the Union soldiers were farmers.The Union Army was better supplied than the Confederates. The Union’s population was around 18.5 million people. The Confederate’s population was 5.5 million people and 3.5 million enslaved soldiers. The Union had more money than the Confederates. The Union Army had 2,672,341 soldiers in the Army. The Confederate’s had between 750,000 to 1,227,890. The Union had 101,000 factories, 1.1 million factory workers, and 20,000 miles of railroad. The Confederates had 21,000 factories, 111,000 factory workers, and 9,000 miles of railroad. The Union consisted of 48% farmers, 24% mechanics, 16% laborers, 5% Commercial, 4% miscellaneous, and 3% professional. The confederates consisted of 69% farmers,9% laborers, 5.3% mechanics, 55 commercial, 2.1% professional, and 1.6%…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though the Union and Confederate soldiers both fought for the victory of their nations, each side had its own reasoning and purpose for doing so. Soldiers relied on their families from home and in battle for encouragement. They wanted to fight not only for their nation, but for their family at home. They didn't want to let them down, alongside of their nation. Their family in regiments was just as beloved. They all felt the same pain and pride, therefore becoming closer to one another. They'd watch each other win and watch each other die. Backing out of it was the last thing they wanted to do and be considered a coward. Soldiers had rather die of honor than live a coward. They were all in it together and that bond with each other kept them from giving up. The leaves that were given gave those enlisted a break from the soldier life for a short period, which was a great privilege. The problem was that the leaves were abused and soldiers wouldn't come back when their time was up, therefore being a deserter. The government wasn't in control enough to do anything about the deserters.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    With a shortage of supplies due to lack of industrial bases, the South suffered greatly in the Civil War, ultimately causing their loss. The North’s ability to bring its industry to manufacture supplies allowed it to gain and maintain its dominance over the South. The South, having just 20,000 factories, was no competition for the North, which had 105,000 factories. However, the South at one point did have an opportunity to gain more supplies through foreign aid, which might have caused the Civil War to have a different outcome if the South would have received that aid. Britain and France were willing to give the South money, food, drugs, weapons, and many more supplies. However, the South practiced the institution of slavery, which prevented European aid. Because the middle-classes of France and Britain were against the “peculiar institution”, they chose to side with the North, rather than the South. The South’s deficiency of materials ultimately caused them to lose the Civil War because they were often not prepared for battles and did not have the necessary supplies to compete with the North’s numerous weapons from their large industries.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Advent of emancipation added the number of free Americans by a great deal. This transformation of status weakened the south, strengthening the North. The slaves in the south were a possible force in aiding the Confederates against the North, which would have been a grand blow to the Union government. Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation was a genius step of weakening south, economically, socially and force wise. The European colonists and slave masters who completely depended on slave labor and slave trade would never join hands with the Union government and so were a possible force together with the Confederates. Gradual emancipation and the abolishing of the slave trade and forced labor was a stealth weapon of weakening the possible force and the South. Many freed slaves began running to Union lines, and this provided the Union with more soldiers (Howell, 2006).…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They depended greatly on the North for their industries and factories, because they had very few. They also opposed federal spending on internal improvements and they wanted no tariffs. Even despite having a somewhat weak economy, the South wanted to gain their independence to become their own country, and to have their own way of life, which included slavery as legal. When Abraham Lincoln was elected in 1860, the South thought that they would have no voice in the government, considering that Abraham Lincoln was against slavery. In hopes of being their own country, the South had no intention of fighting a war. However, before the war started, the South was unwilling to compromise. They thought that slavery should be allowed in all of the territories. They disagreed to the Missouri Compromise and to parts of the Compromise of 1850. Many felt that these compromises were unfair and biased. The South felt that their way of life and views on slavery were right and just. They turned to what they thought was their only choice: seceding from the Union. This enrage the North, which was one of the main causes of the Civil War.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays