top-rated free essay

Conditional Sentences

By KaniTAbdullah1 Nov 05, 2012 1041 Words
8—AGENDA—DECEMBER 1998

Noam Chomsky on
LANGUAGE
by Aaron Stark
Why should one be interested in
studying language? Noam Chomsky’s
answer to this question in part characterizes the importance of his linguistic theories to modern thought. In his view, to truly study language is to study a part of
human nature, manifested in the human
mind. What does he mean by this? To
begin, one has to understand what
Chomsky thinks the nature of human languages actually is, and why it is so interesting. One of the fundamental aspects of human language, according to
Chomsky, is its creative nature. The last
sentence (and, in fact, this one) have
probably never been produced before in
the history of the world. the same is true
for much of what we say every day. So,
we do not seem to learn or to speak language by purely imitating other people. How are we able to judge
whether a sentence sounds okay? Can we
literally have a list of sentences in our
mind against which we check each new
sentence we hear? Chomsky argues not,
since our brains are finite but English is
potentially infinite (consider the sentences “I like the number one”, “I like the number one and I like the number
two”, “I like the number one and I like
the number two and I like the number
three,” etc.).
Can we process each new sentence by analogy with ones that we’ve heard before? Chomsky argues that this
is not possible either, since, he claims,
analogies are too loose to explain our understanding of complex sentences. For instance, if we remove the last two words
of the simple sentence “Abby is baking
vegan muffins” we get a sentence that
means she’s baking something (maybe
muffins, maybe not). But if (by analogy)
we remove the same words from the complex sentence “Abby is too tasteful to pour gravy on vegan muffins” we get
“Abby is too tasteful to pour gravy on,”
which should (by the analogy) mean she
doesn’t pour gravy on something, but intead means that no one should pour ravy on her.
In contrast to these alternate
heories, Chomsky argues that we can
ake these judgements because we posess an abstract system of unconscious nowledge about our language. This sysem of knowledge includes, for starters, nowledge about sentence structure and
ord order (we know that “Bites the dog
an” is not the way to express the meanng that the dog is biting a man). It also ncludes knowledge about meaning (we
now that when we speak of a brown
ouse, it is the outside of the house that
s brown, not the inside), and knowledge

about sounds (we can tell when someone is speaking with an accent not our own). Chomsky argues that this knowledge of language is separate from other types of knowledge that we have; that
we don’t just use general-purpose strategies (like analogy) to make the judgements that we do. To possess this kind of knowledge, says Chomsky, is what it
means to “know English” (or any other
language).
How do we come by this knowledge of language; how do we learn our native language? It’s not likely that parents explicitly teach kids these rules in the cradle. And, because of both the abstractness of the rules and the complexity of the samples of languages that even infants hear, Chomsky doesn’t think that

general smarts can do the job either.
(Children with otherwise severe learning difficulties often learn language easily.) Instead, he argues that something specifically about human language must
be innate—that is, available to us by virtue of being human, specified somehow in our genetic makeup.
Chomsky is not saying that humans are born with English or Vietnamese or any other language ‘hardwired-in’. These innate properties must be properties available to all human languages. According to one theory, these properties are composed of principles and parameters— what is called ‘universal grammar’— principles being universal to all human languages, with cross-language

variation accounted for by parameters
each of which can be set in any of a small
number of ways, like a light switch that
can be turned on or off. Learning a language, in this view, means setting parameter values; setting the switches in a particular way. So how do Chomsky’s theories
of knowledge of language and how we
come to know it relate to the study of
human nature? As one might guess, he
rejects the view of the human mind as a
blank slate at birth, filled in by experience. Rather, Chomsky suggests that components of the mind, including language and other systems of knowledge, are largely innately determined. Experience (of one’s culture, language, etc.) does not fill a blank slate, but instead

interacts with innate properties to form
‘competence’ in these different systems
of knowledge. All these components interact with each other, or are linked in unknown ways to form the object of vast
complexity that is the human mind.
Chomsky’s theory of language
and mind has been influential on scholars in many different fields— cognitive psychology, philosophy, some branches
of mathematics. Even in the U.S. where
his theories have perhaps been the most
influential, there are many competing
models of language and the mind. While
some who object to Chomsky’s arguments seem to misunderstand his theories, naturally many have genuine dis-

agreements with some of his assumptions. But most, perhaps, would recognize some of his general contributions to the modern study of the mind.
Chomsky has shown that the study of the
mind cannot limit itself strictly to the examination of behavior. The concept of an unconscious ‘knowledge state’ is not
unscientific, as some other modern theorists of mind have assumed. Instead, such concepts are essential in order to account
for the complexity and creativity exhibited by the normal human mind—a mind that each of us possesses. R

Send Noam a free birthday
message via www.zmag.org
by Dec 5th and get on a
scroll of global supporters
to be given him Dec 7th!

Noam Chomsky is cornered by
University of Michigan students
Bisan Salhi, Will Youmans, and
Nazarene Syed after a recent
public lecture to benefit high
school union organizing in Fort
Wayne, IN.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • Conditional Sentence and Type

    ...Type I or Type II Decide whether the following Conditional Sentences are Type I or Type II. 1. If they go to Australia, they will go whale-watching.
Type I Type II 2. If she had a mobile, I would call her.
Type I Type II 3. If Bob were here, he would have a solution for our problem.
Type I Type II 4. If you move...

    Read More
  • Following Conditional Construction

    ...ZERO CONDITIONAL A. Sample sentences If interest rates fall, company profits rise. If prices don't go up, people buy more. B. Form (condition) (result) If sales increase, we make more profit. ZERO CONDITIONAL C. Uses The sentences of Zero conditional are general facts or things that are always true, i.e. the cons...

    Read More
  • First Conditional

    ...Teaching ideas for first conditional Maja Hadzic, Belgrade, Serbia 1. I usually give some examples of superstitions, e.g. If you break a mirror, you will... (they give the answer, since they already know Future Simple Tense). 2. Then I give some more oral examples for them to finish. 3. After that they make their own examples. 4. Now t...

    Read More
  • Conditional Tense

    ...CONDITIONAL TENSE Conditional sentences usually are of the type in which one circumstance will be symbiotic with the other. For example, “if I find her address, I’ll send her the invite.” Normally, there are three kinds of relationships which can be expressed using the conditional- factual, future, and imaginative conditional relationsh...

    Read More
  • second and third conditional

    ...SECOND CONDITIONAL Why we use second conditional? We are thinking about a particular condition in the future, and the result of this condition. But there is not a real possibility. For example, you do not have a lottery ticket. Is it possible to win? No! No lottery ticket, no win! But maybe you will buy a lottery ticket in the future. S...

    Read More
  • Sentence Skills

    ... 1. Which sentence contains words in italics that form a gerund phrase? (A gerund is a verb form used the same way as a noun.) A. An interesting novel provides good entertainment. B. The laughing boy sat down. C. Winning the race demanded speed and endurance. D. I am going home. 2. The italici...

    Read More
  • Sentence

    ...13, 2012 1. Sentence * A grammatical unit of one or more words thatexpresses an independent statement, question, request, command, exclamation, etc. * A group of words which expresses a complete and definite thought Kinds of Sentences * Declarative - A declarative sentence makes a statement. A declarative sent...

    Read More
  • Sentence or sentence fragments

    ..._____________________ I. Decide whether each of the following word groups is a sentence or a sentence fragment. If the word group is a sentence, write S on the line provided. If it is a sentence fragment, write F. _________ 1. Taking a canoe trip in Canada. _________ 2. Sufficient food for a week’s journey. _________ 3. Others had camped the...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.