Preview

Conditio Sine Qua Non Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1449 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conditio Sine Qua Non Theory
a) In order to determine whether or not there is a factual causal connection between the injuries inflicted upon X during the fight and the eventual loss of X’s business, we need to look at the method of the conditio sine qua non theory and determine if there was actually a factual causal nexus. According to Van der Merwe and Olivier, conditio sine qua non theory is when an act is the cause of a result if the act cannot be thought away without the result also disappearing. This means that for an act to be the cause of a result, the result must not exist when the cause is mentally removed. This factual test for causation was accepted in the case of International Shipping Co (Pty) Ltd v Bentley. In the case of X, if the fight between X and Y …show more content…
Some believe that this theory is based on clumsy thinking and often people land up right where they started when trying to determine the connection. This theory also fails in cases where there is more than one act that caused the result. Some also believe that this theory is not a legitimate test of causation because it merely expresses a predetermined causal nexus.

Despite these criticisms the conditio sine qua non test has a flexible approach as seen in the case of Lee v Minister of Correctional Services. In Minister of Finance v Gore, the court states that the conditio sine qua non theory is ‘a matter of common sense’. The flexible approach to this theory is supported because it accepts the practical way of thinking and is based on the real life experiences of people. The application of the conditio sine qua non, even in its flexible form can still lead to the denial of liability in certain cases since justice would denied if the defendant did not cause the
…show more content…
At this point we now need to determine what factual causation is. Factual causation is a link/connection between at least two facts, where one fact arises from the other. One fact is the cause of another, one fact only exists because of the other. Because life is quite dynamic, it is quite difficult to find a general test for causality. A test for factual causation would then be based on what facts could be proved. This means that the factual causation would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. Factual causation is pure question of fact, it either exists or it doesn’t. Courts will usually test whether or not there was causation by examining the available evidence.

When determining whether or not there is factual causation, the courts will usually look at whether a defendant’s conduct has in any way contributed to the damage sustained by the plaintiff.
It is a fact that the fight between X and Y resulted in X being hospitalised and subsequently getting an infection, being administered penicillin and having an allergic reaction to it, resulting in brain injury and which ultimately led X to lose his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Memo PA110

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A similar case would be Timmerman v Modern Industries, INC. 960 F.2d 692; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6205. This case involved a collision between a truck (Defendant, Modern Industries) and a person (Timmerman). Timmerman died due to his injuries resulting from the accident. The decedent’s mother brought a wrongful death suit against Modern Industries. Timmerman was found to be 51% at fault thus the claim against Modern Industries was denied. Timmerman’s actions before he collided with Modern Industries are what led to the accident in the first place. An example of one of Timmerman’s contribution to the accident is:…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Proximate cause exists when the connection between an act and an injury is strong enough to justify imposing liability.…

    • 4685 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Care Policy

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The final element needed to establish negligence requires that there be a close, reasonable, and casual relationship between the defendant’s negligent conduct and the resulting damages suffered by the plaintiff – in other words…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In all actions brought to recover damage for negligence resulting in death or injury to person or property, the fact that the plaintiff may have been guilty of…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A guilty mind is the second general feature that has to be established and is probably the most complex because it involves subjective evaluation of the mind.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Regina Knight Case

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order for a trial to be brought, the police and prosecutors might be able to prove that the elements of the particular offence are present. In this criminal case both Actus reus, Mens rea as well causation was clearly shown through the behavior of Katherine Knight.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causation refers to whether the defendant's conduct caused the harm or damage in a crime and it must be established in all result crimes. Causation in criminal liability is divided into factual causation and legal causation. Factual causation is the starting point and consists of applying the 'but for' test. In most cases, factual causation alone will be enough to establish causation. However, in some circumstances it will also be necessary to consider legal causation. Legal causation is when the result must be caused by a culpable act, the act of the defendant may not necessarily need to be the only cause, but must be more than minimal. Factual causation is established by applying the 'but for' test. This asks, 'but for the actions of the defendant, would the result have occurred?' If the answer is yes, the result would have occurred in any circumstance and the defendant is not liable. If no the defendant is liable as it can be said that their action was a factual cause of the result.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Causation and Correlation

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Correlation does not imply causation. According to “statistical Language Correlation and Causation” (Correlation is a statistical measure (expressed as a number) that describes the size and direction of a relationship between two or more variables. A correlation between variables, however, does not automatically mean that the change in one variable is the cause of the change in the values of the other variable.) And (Causation indicates that one event is the result of the occurrence of the other event; i.e. there is a causal relationship between the two events. This is also referred to as cause and effect.) Causation and correlation can be difficult to discern from one another because they are so closely related to one another.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Factual Causation: having been proven in court of causing harm and discomfort to a person or property…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LSTD301 QUIZ 1

    • 259 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To meet the intent element required for possession, a defendant should be aware of the possession.…

    • 259 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causation - term used to refer to the relationship between a person’s criminal actions and criminal intent. Resulting in the act causing harm.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law looks at two types of causation—actual cause and proximate cause. Often, injury and harm is the result of a chain of events. The person who is the actual cause may or may not be legally responsible. Proximate cause is that act in the natural, direct, uninterrupted sequence of events without which the injury would not have occurred. Proximate cause seeks to decide who, in that chain of events, is responsible for the harm. This can get complicated.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Law Midterm

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The defendant’s act must have been the “cause in fact” of the victim’s death. Without the defendant’s actions, the victim would not have died.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Upon review of the case, the Supreme Court determined that both partners were jointly and severally liable for the…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Conviction Paper

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The argument contained in the paper while correct does not withstand critical scrutiny. The paper correctly notes that wrongful convictions occur when innocent people are found guilty by criminal courts. However, the paper does not take into account that courts that deal with civil cases can in specific instances order the conviction of individuals. The assertion that wrongful convictions occur on a daily basis is not supported by any evidence. Where it is proven that there are wrongful convictions in the US justice system, it would be erroneous to attribute any adjective as to the prevalence without subjecting the justice system to scrutiny through scientific inquiry. The necessity of utilizing modern investigative mechanisms to…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics