Preview

Conceptual Framework Of Piety Glory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
347 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conceptual Framework Of Piety Glory
After meeting with Dr. Loebenberg, it came to my attention that my argument to the relationship of piety, glory, and moral responsibility lacked a conceptual framework. This framework should have addressed the relationship and provided a “backbone” to the argument that would create an effective platform for reasoning. The idea behind the conceptual framework should have been an overarching concept that supported my argument: Glory received by pious mortals and their interactions with their Gods served as an incentive to be piety in their society. My paper’s argument follows up with a declaration of this relationship and the result: a lower level of free will. Due to the increased involvement of a divine authority, the moral responsibility of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this paper I intend to explain what the Divine Command Theory means according to Emil Brunner and how Kai Nielsen objects to that theory. I plan to do this by an explanation of what Divine Command Theory is as opposed to Humanistic Ethics. I plan to show that abandoning religious ethics in support of Humanistic Ethics is not reasonable.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Linda’s argument, especially the latter half, may seem similar to my argument, Linda’s argument is not sound, but rather a weak counterargument to the objection made, because Linda makes Pascal’s Wager more of a religious recruiting tool than an actual legitimate argument by itself. The distinction between our arguments is that I argued Pascal’s Wager causes an individual to follow the religion for its benefits, temporarily becoming a selfish person before becoming a selfless individual, whereas Linda argues that the Wager itself does not create a low view of God and of religious people because the Wager is not faith in and of itself but rather the Wager is just the beginning of the path to sincere faith. Meaning, similar to the “greater good” argument about evil discussed above, I argue that Pascal’s Wager is a “greater good” argument for a necessity to temporarily be selfish until one becomes selfless, whereas Linda views the Wager more as a path for atheists or christians who are having second thoughts about believing in…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout their conversation with one another, Socrates sets up Euthyphro to contradict himself to prove that he is not as much of an expert as he thinks he is on religious matters. Where Socrates trips up Euthyphro is on his definition of piety. The original concept Euthyphro claimed was that something is pious if it is loved by the gods, and it is pious based off of that alone. Socrates continues to pose questions to Euthyphro on this idea, as it is a very vague definition that does not give very much insight into what piety exactly is. Eventually, Socrates asks if something pious is loved by the gods because it is in fact pious, or is it pious solely because it is loved by the gods? This is where this concept begins to unravel. Euthyphro…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unfinished Business.” The New England Quarterly. 73.2 (Jun, 2000): 202-221. The New England Quarterly Inc. 5 Mar. 2009. .…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phi Euthyphro

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates during this conversation with Euthyphro works to grasp the full understaind of this elusive concept and tries with everything he knows to use logic to understand what the meaning of holiness is, where is came from, and why it has benefits. This paper I will try to explain the concept of holiness as it emerges and identify the three different definitions of piety that Euthyphro uses to help get Socrates to understand. In addition this paper will point out what Socrates goal for this discussion was and also create an argument of my definition of holiness.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato's dialog, Euthyphro is trying to prosecute his father for murder also Socrates ask Euthyphro to define piety and impiety. Euthyphro explains that what he is doing now, prosecuting the wrongdoer, is pious, whether it be about murder or robbery whether it be your father, mother or a stranger, to not prosecute would be impious.(9e) This first definition is only an example of an instance of piety and does not actually state what makes pious things pious. Just like this definition the rest of his arguments can be countered and denied. Euthyphro is in the wrong, it is unjust to prosecute your own father. Euthyphro is arrogant and self righteous. He is unwilling to hear others opinions, because he believes he is in the right.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthyphro is a dialogue between Socrates and a traveling cleric. The two men meet at court, where the cleric, Euthyphro, claims to have a clear definition of piety. Socrates exclaims that he wishes to know the definition of piety so that he may better defend himself in his upcoming trial. Euthyphro agrees to teach Socrates, and so they begin to discuss. Early on, Socrates makes clear his desire for a universal truth, or a definition of piety that will be true in every case. Euthyphro makes several attempts to define piety in a way that satisfies Socrates.…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Journal of Religious Ethics Vol. 25, No. 3 (1997): 130. Web. 10 Mar. 2010…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Divine Command Theory

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    People are extremely motivated by self-interest, even as societies have evolved and grown larger. While the more intertwined societies did lead to a greater need for cooperation in order to live as peacefully as possible, the need to follow the rules of that society can still be ignored when self-interests are present. The need to live by a set of moral rules is well explained by connecting God and morality. As God holds a person accountable, following the moral rules is now is that person’s interest. So even while the person may act according to society, the actions are still explained by the incentives and sanctions placed by God with the promise of Heaven and the threat of Hell, respectively. However, the Divine Command Theory falls short by basing morality solely on God’s commands. Morality then seems subject to God’s whims, which makes morality arbitrary. The opposing view counters strongly with the existence of morals within atheists. For if morals are based only on God’s will, then atheists must be godless brutes lacking any semblance to a moral compass. The morality of atheists is clearly evident, yet the argument failed to establish a reason for morals other acknowledging damage done to the…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question and Socrates

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Euthyphro is a tale of Socrates and Euthyphro. They meet by chance and end up discussing what is holy and what is piety. Socrates tries to get answers from Euthyphro but because of his unwillingness to learn, they end back at the beginning of their discussion. In Euthyphro, we see the three distinct definitions of piety and holiness that is given by Euthyphro and how Socrates refutes them. This paper will give those definitions and my own argument as to what Socrate’s goal was in the Euthyphro, as well as my own definitions as to what piety and holiness is.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Euthyphro Dilemma

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages

    First I will discuss ‘divine command theory’, one horn of the dilemma (2). Next, I will talk about the other horn, which includes all theories about ethics (or meta-ethics) that aren’t related to God’s will (1). After examining the weaknesses of each option, I will consider – and argue against - the alternative options presented by theists. Finally, I will state the reasons why the arguments for divine command theory aren’t strong enough, and why (1) is the most sensible option to choose.…

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro’s suggestion that piety is a part of justice is perhaps as close to a definition of piety that we ever receive in the dialogue of Euthyphro. This is because of all the explanations offered by Euthyphro, this one comes closest to measuring piety with a valid, universal standard.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Needs Theology

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cited: Grenz, Stanley J., and Roger E. Olson. Who Needs Theology? An Invitation to the Study of God.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Enforcement Ethics

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Spinoza, B. (1995). Belief in God motivates people to behave ethically. In D. Bender (Eds.). Ethics (pp.19-22). CA: Greenhaven Press.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Thomistic Account of Omnipotence states that x is omnipotent, by definition for any logically possible state of affairs, o, it is possible for x to bring it about that o.…

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays