Henry Clay also delivered more than seventy speeches throughout the process, “ as a powerful sentiment for acceptance gradually crystallized in the North” (Cohen/Kennedy). For eight months members of Congress, led by Clay, Daniel Webster, Senator from Massachusetts, and John C. Calhoun, senator from South Carolina, debated the compromise. With the help of Stephen Douglas, a young Democrat from Illinois, a series of bills that would make up the compromise were ushered through Congress. It was these few men that led the creation of the compromise and are known historically for their …show more content…
If you weigh out the wins and losses for both the North and the South in this whole ordeal, you’ll find that the North had the better deal. This crazy and chaotic decade gave the North time to accumulate the material and moral strength that provided the margin of victory. In fact, I believe that the North was victorious in the Civil war because of having the better end of Compromise of 1850. If the compromise would have dealt out a little differently, the result of the Civil War might have been altered. This Compromise also played an important role in the Underground Railroad. The effects of the compromise put a major jumpstart on the railroad and gave many African Americans the chance to start a new life in Canada and other free