top-rated free essay

Compromise of 1850 and Mexican War

By MirandaPanda80 Mar 16, 2011 1003 Words
Political compromise in the later years of the Ante-Bellum Period, specifically from 1820-1861, are crucial when speaking in terms of causes of the Civil War. Though the government and politics of such tried fiercly to reduce sectionalist tensions, in the end they were unsuccessful. Out of all the reasons- political and not- the four things within those years that strike most as failures of the government are the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Wilmot Proviso of 1848, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, and the Presidential Election of 1860.

The Missouri Compromise is transparently the catalyst for all other issues that had risen. In 1820, Washington decided on “a bundle of three compromises” led by Henry Clay. The primary of the three was that no longer could slave states be addmitted into the Union above the 36°30' latitude line. The line is Missouri's southern border. The other two compromises are basically the terms of the 36°30' rule: No slave state above, and only slave states below it. Neither North nor South was completely satisfied; nevertheless, they both gained some. It was a weak beginning to abolition, and it did ease slight tension. On the other hand, the extremists on either side were definitely not happy because one side had not truly lost. The institution of slavery was necessary and practically sacred to Southerners. The land in the Southwest was also viewed by many plantation owners as unusable because the soil wasn't good for cotton. It was a gain ultimately for the North, for it limited the spread of slavery to any newly acquired territories(from the Mexican War and Oregon Territories). Some political compromise was made, but it was brittle in that it would fall to pieces in the next 34 years.

Along with a bill that would hopefully end the Mexican War, the Wilmot Proviso added something to the table. Under James K. Polk and at the near end of the Mexican War, David Wilmot put his word in that footing a bill to bring peace is not the only thing that would help. It stated that in the lands from the Mexican territory none of it would succumb to slavery. This went against the Missouri Compromise and was an attempt to limit slavery even further. It never actually became a federal law; however, it was suppoerted and endorsed by almost all of the free states. If the Proviso had passed, it would have extirpated popular sovereignty. David Wilmot, proposer of the amendment to the bill, also single handedly increased sectional tensions between North and South because the two had opposing views on the matter. Government had little options to stop him from proposing this, which makes it less Washington's fault, but they still failed to compromise politically. This was the first crack at the Missouri Compromise that led to it's decent.

Eighteen years after the Wilmot Proviso proposal was declined, even further were the sectionalist tensions increased by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. By that time, Pierce had been elected president from the Democratic Party and his Expanionist plan was in full swing. Nicaragua, Asia, and Cuba had all been settled with the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty in '50, Gadsden Purchase in '53, and Ostend Manifesto in '54. Stephen Douglass had taken the stage to settle the slavery issue in the Kansas-Nebraska Territory, so he decided to try and split them. Kansas would be a slave state and Nebraska would be a free one. The North was shocked by Douglass's attempt to ease it into Congress. By itself, the bill caused the repeal of the Missouri Compromise and completely destroyed political compromise with slavery. Sectionalist tensions were as high as ever, and the repeal became somewhat of an instigator for issues later to come. Southerners wanting slavery in Kansas were appauled by the North allegedly trying to control Kansas. The Republican Party was formed because of the Act and became the nation's number 2 political party almost overnight. This contributed to the differences between North and South, and it effecticely wrecked both the 1820 and 1850 compromises. But this was not the Union's breaking point.

The election of 1860 was not the final straw either, but it came dangerously close to the point of the South threatening to secede. Abraham Lincoln, Stephen Douglass, John C. Breckinridge, and John Bell were the four candidates of the election. Lincoln had two years earlier beaten Douglass to the Senatorial seat, and now he tried to beat him again with the Presidential Election. The Democratic Party was split, so they decided on two cadidates which were Breckinridge and Douglass. The Constitutional Union chose Bell, and the Republicans had Lincoln. With his campaign revolving around westward expansion and abolition, Lincoln did not get very many supporters. The people of the country more so wanted Douglass. With only 40% of the entire country's votes Lincoln won the presidency. Douglass came in second with ~30%, Breckinridge ended third with ~20%, and Bell rounded out the four in las place with only about 13%. Lincoln, the sectional president, had not been elected for four days when South Carolina seceded. The blame rested on Buchanan's shoulders, for he was the president still until March 1861. This was ultimately the cause for disunion. During the election, or rather the time of campaigning, South Carolina had stated that if Lincoln was elected they would secede; and they went through with their word. Sectionalist tensions has risen to a peak and cracked under pressure. The Missouri Compromise was no longer available to be a scapegoat, and neither were the other political controversies. The Union's last leg to stand on was kicked out from under it. It would take several more months until the actual war started; however, by this point it is clearly inevitable. Political compromise was out of the question, and by then it was only a matter of time before the first shots were fired.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • Compromise of 1850

    ...Jonathan Sacelaris Professor Crider HIS 173-01 April 1, 2013 The Successful Compromise of 1850 The Compromise of 1850 was a successful negotiation regarding the discord between the slave owners in the South and the opponents of slavery in the North. The Compromise of 1850 included a series of five acts, which were aggressively debated wi...

    Read More
  • The Compromise of 1850

    ...The Compromise of 1850 & Fredrick Douglas The Compromise of 1850 was primarily about the future of slavery in the new territories and the Union. Out of the Compromise of 1850 came “The Fugitive Slave Law”, which gave owners of escaped slaves the power and the resources to procure their escaped slaves. It constituted one of its provisions wa...

    Read More
  • The Compromise of 1850

    ...The Compromise of 1850 was effective for the southern states even though California was a slave free state in 1849 when California joined the union. (1) Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois managed to push this agreement for California to enter the Union as a free state but there were concessions made to slave owners about other acquisitions....

    Read More
  • Compromise of 1850

    ...THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 A little after the Manifest Destiny, the U.S. faced a series of troubles of sectional balances over whether or not the land acquired should be free or slavery states. The Compromise of 1850, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, included measures that dealt with the land acquired specifically from the Mexican War. Until 1845, ...

    Read More
  • Mexican War

    ...The Mexican War is often regarded as one of the United State’s most controversial wars. The idea of Manifest Destiny was beginning to consume the minds of many Democratic Americans. They wished for the United States to expand their land to possess a continental control; it was believed that more land would mean furthered economical success. Me...

    Read More
  • Mexican American War

    ...than 1 paragraph each, some are a sentence or two): -The Mexican American War: The Mexican-American war was a fight for lad between the Untied States and Mexico where the United States defeated Mexico and gained over five hundred thousand miles of land. The land in known as the Southwest and makes up a vast majority of the United States. A majo...

    Read More
  • Compromise of 1850

    ...The Compromise of 1850 was a series of acts passed in 1850, by which the United States Congress hoped to settle the strife between the opponents of slavery in the North and slave owners in the South. There is much speculation about how our country would be without this Compromise. The Compromise is a major stepping stone in United States history...

    Read More
  • compromise of 1850

    ... The Compromise of 1850 After the war with Mexico, there was a lot of unsettled business to take care of. Such as that should the territory gained from the war allow slavery, or should it be declared free? Or maybe the inhabitants should be allowed to choose for themselves? Also, California had recently petitioned Congress to enter the Union...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.