Preview

Compatibilism Vs Determinism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1024 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compatibilism Vs Determinism
A guy wearing a ski mask walks into a grocery store an opens fire on everyone within sight. Did that man choose to pull the trigger, or did a past event cause him to do it without any choice in the matter? Having free will is what make us who we are for we choose what we do on a daily basis. However, some people believe that we don’t have a choice. These people are determinists and they believe that every event is caused by a previous event. The problem of free will started because there are people out there that are trying to prove determinists that they are wrong and that we do indeed have free will. Who is right? Who is wrong? The answer to that question has yet to be discovered, however, everyone is titled to his or her own beliefs. I, …show more content…
On one side you have determinists, and on the other side you have indeterminists. Indeterminists believe that not every event is determined by past events. While there are two sides to the free will problem, we also have a middle ground. Compatibilists believe that determinism is true but also that our actions can be free as well. We also have incompatablists that believe that if determinism is true, then no one has free will. There are indeed many stances on the problem of free will, but again, who is right? Also, do any of these stances take into account religion? Having faith in a god, god’s, an afterlife, reincarnation, etc. could indeed be the difference between having a free will or not. For example, one who believes in a god should have a higher chance in believing in a free will than those who do not. The reason for this is that having faith in a superior being is also having the belief that a superior being would not make our choices for us, but let us choose for ourselves. It makes no sense that a greater being would put us here for us not to have the ability to make our own …show more content…
Personally, the right view is that there is indeed such a thing as free will for without it society would crumble as people stop having faith as well as personal accountability. Why would anyone want to do the right thing if they didn’t have a choice to do the right thing? Also, without free will one loses the reason to live. Living without a choice in what you do, who you love, where you go is living without reason. If everyone’s lives were planned out from day one there would be no real completion in this world. There would also be no point in having faith for why would a greater being that’s supposed to be almighty put people into bad situations when they could have made it so everyone was happy and on the same level as everyone else. This is why free will exists, for without life itself would not be life at

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are three main positions in the free will debate; determinism, compatibilism, and libertarianism. In my opinion, the strongest argument of these is compatibilism due to it agreeing with my views and beliefs on the subject of free will.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Times argues in their article “Do You Have Free Will? Yes, It’s the Only Choice” that free will probably does not exist but people are better off believing in it. The article discusses a study done by Dr. Kathleen Vohs that concludes “the higher the [test subjects] scored on the scale of belief in free will, the better their ratings on the job.” The Atlantic’s article “There’s No Such Thing as Free Will” suggests that free will does not exist but also shows that people who believe in free will are less stressed and more creative. Both articles share the idea that free will makes people more optimistic. Believing in free will gives people the idea that people can make good decisions. It lets people believe that morality exists and people are able to make good decisions on their…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A very wise man once says, "God versus Man, Man versus God, God versus Nature, Nature versus God, Man versus Nature, Nature versus Man." These six battles constitute an ultimately greater battle: the battle of free will versus determinism. Free will is the ability for a human being to make decisions as to what life he or she would like to lead and have the freedom to live according to their own means and choose their own destiny.…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate between freewill and determinism stems from the apparent conflict between the universal rule of causality that is deeply rooted in nature, and between the apparent ability of human beings to choose between multiple courses of action in order to lead to the most desirable outcome. The universal rule of causality simply claims that inorganic matter such as tables, chairs and rocks are acted upon by whatever forces affect it, however, human beings seem to be an exception to this rule by their unique ability to ponder about how to go about making decisions in their life and which…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The concept of free will gives you more motivation to hand down reinforcement, whether it is positive or negative, to those around you. It also helps you accept reinforcement from others. The concept of free will is a powerful force that keeps societies working correctly. Our entire legal and social system is based on the concept of free will. Everything in society is interlocking, so if we try to change society to fit the new idea that free will is irrelevant we will find inconsistencies and injustice until a solution is found in a stable society not based on the recognition of free will. Societal upheaval would be ridiculous because it wouldn’t accomplish anything. Judgment using free will is second nature to us as humans. When asked about Hitler, a Holocaust survivor, even a determinist one, wouldn’t say, ‘He did terrible things but it wasn’t his fault because he has no control over what happens in his brain.’ Determinist ideals can only go so far before they become eclipsed by human emotion; therefore it would be ill advised to try to change society to fit the new…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the religious community preaches its own view of free will, science sees the matter very differently. The scientific community has two main ideas concerning free will. The first of these ideas is libertarianism, which states that people are free to act on their own accord without the determinism of human nature and from any predeterminism coming from a spiritual entity, including a god. The second and more popular opinion is that of hard determinism. Hard determinism insists that no person is morally responsible for their actions because everything has a cause or causes that determine what it is. Most people believe that they are making the choices they make freely. Science says that for a person to have free choice in a decision, they must have options to choose from.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Well, breaking it down that is not what free will defines. Free will is the ability to make his or her own decision. To some extent determinism (not to be confused with hard determinism) and free will can both collaborate together making our world. Yes, something had to create us, but when we are born we are born with a desire to follow our hearts. We are designed to have our own free will. Although it may seem like hard determinism derails free will's argument it is an incorrect accusation at a completely different topic not in relation to free will. If we used hard determinism, that would mean that no one is held accountable to their actions or morals. With their philosophy it would mean that everything was planned out and whatever happens was planned to happen. So with that in mind it does not matter if I steal because it was supposed to happen, etc. I believe God gave us free will to further the Kingdom of God, and because He wants us to choose Him, not be forced to love…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines philosophical determinism as “the belief that all events are caused by things that happened before them and that people have no real ability to make choices or control what happens; a theory or doctrine that acts of the will, occurrences in nature, or social or psychological phenomena are causally determined by preceding events or natural laws; a belief in predestination, the quality or state of being determined” (1). Does this mean that whatever action we make is a choice that doesn’t belong to us, but is rather a result of complex events that surround us? Do people have a right to justify some of their actions, and can be excused due to an idea that they do not act voluntarily?…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism is a controversial topic to free will with multiple theories proving and disproving it. As printed in The Collins Cobuild Learner's Dictionary, determinism is defined as “...the belief that all actions and events result from other actions, events, or situations, so people cannot in fact choose what to do.” Meaning, all life choices are predetermined from the minute we are born, to the minute we die. In contrast, “freewill is an individual taking control and responsibility for his/her actions according to his personal will” (Freewill Verses Determinism). People who believe in Free will, accept the idea that life is not predetermined, and they can independently act however they see fit. Free will and determinism can be further simplified and have multiple differences as well as similarities.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ayer argues that individuals do possess free will and individuals that make decisions voluntarily should be held responsible for their actions which goes against the theory of determinism and compatibilism. Determinism holds that individuals do not possess free will given that their actions are predetermined which prevents individuals to avoid any actions, therefore making them not morally responsible. On the other hand, compatibilism holds that both determinism and the concept of free will are both compatible and one can be a determinist and also believe in individuals possessing free will. However, Ayer argues that the fact that both of these theories state that individuals have the ability to act otherwise, that in itself demonstrates that…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Various philosophers have explained iterations of free will in more depth, resulting in a greater number of issues connected to it. When arguing against free will, the concept of determinism is advanced as the main argument. Determinism is the philosophical idea that every event or state of affairs, including every human decision, and action, is predetermined. The main perceived threats to our freedom of will are various alleged determinisms. These can be physical, psychological, biological or theological in nature. For example, suppose you meet a person you are instantly attracted to. Practically every thought and emotion in your body commands you to approach the person but for various reasons you hold back; the moment doesn't feel right.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gary Gutting, the author of the article, What Makes Free Will Free? deliberates that we do not have free choice as we assumed which a researcher confirmed. By free choice, this means the conviction that our conduct is dictated by our own unrestrained choice and that we have complete power over our activities. Also, Gary Gutting examined various thoughts on determinism as the researchers suggested. Determinism refers to the conviction that all human conduct or any other occurrences have a cause. This is opposed to a person's will to accomplish an action. Gary Gutting discussed what David Hume, a philosopher, believed and the belief of David Hume is that both determinism and free choice are possible, they are compatible with each…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would lean more towards the compatibilist view stating, unless I am the cause of my actions I am not responsible for them. As compatibilist holds that free will and determinism are compatible, we can properly understand what it means for our actions to be free so we see that a free action is doing what one wants. Believing in compatibilism doesn't mean the determinist view is false, but if it is true, we can still have free will. I believe that we make decisions based on our own desires and beliefs. It is said that compatibilists attempt to revise and weaken the commonsense notion of free will. Thomas Hobbes was the first person to articulate a compatibilist position believing that although the person is free to act on their motive, the motive is determined. In other words, he says “Everything we choose to do is strictly determined by the need to relieve the physical pressures of our bodies. Humans…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perspectives, Psychology

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The freewill versus determinism debate refers to the question of whether a person has control their over behaviour and understands the motives behind it (freewill), or if their behavior is determined by some force over them and have no control (Determinism), such as their genetics or upbringing. Although they are both very different perspectives believe both nature and nurture to play an important role in the development of someone’s personality and behavior. Psychoanalysts tend to believe in determinism, as a result of perceived unconscious influences on the character, and humanists believe in free will.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If free will did not exist then how does it explain the good in evil in the world. For instance if God knew peoples destiny’s he would have it to where we would all choose to be good and holy as opposed to bad. But, this isn't the case because there is in fact bad out there in the world and the reason is because we as humans were given the right to choose for ourselves. Not only is there free will to choose between right and wrong but there also to love. We have the free will to love anyone we want and as many people as we want. If free will didn't exist then we would only be able to love one person for our life time which again isn't the case because there are so many divorces taking place because people fall out of love with each other. Another example is a prisoner may be said to possess no freedom, however he or she still possesses limited choices. In the very least the imprisoned human has the ability to make some action not determined by the institution whether it be to end his or her life or simply to speak certain words or make a specific eye…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays