Preview

Comparison and contrast of Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1501 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparison and contrast of Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley
Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley civilizations have long been compared throughout history and were both some of the earliest civilizations in the world. Mesopotamia, also known as, 'the land between the rivers,' was named for the triangular area between the Tigris and the Euphrates rivers. This area has been extended and now covers modern day Iraq, adding ancient Assyria and Babylonia to that land. The Indus civilization is often referred to as the Harappan civilization from the first city discovered called Harappa. The Indus civilization existed in the vast river plains of what are now Pakistan and northwestern India between the Indus and Ganges rivers from about 2800 BC to 1800 BC. Though these two territories had many things in common due to their surrounding geographies, they also differed in some fundamental ways such as economy, government, and social system.

The economy of Mesopotamia was mainly agricultural, but also included wool, hair, and leather. The domestication of animals, painting of pottery, and most importantly, agriculture spread to Greece from Mesopotamia. This agriculture was being jeopardized from the progressing salinization (treating of salt) of the soil, and the weakening of the dikes. This necessitated constant watch employed by the temple and the palace. Silver was used in the Babylonian period, and it was being hoarded as treasure by the palace and the temple. There were three kinds of trade going on in Mesopotamia, one being inner city trade. The second kind was an ongoing trade between foreign cities and trading outposts. The last was the export of industrial goods to sights such as Al Mina at the mouth of the Orontes River in Syria. Items that were exported include textiles made by serfs(servant required to perform labor for his/her lord) and the importing of metal, stone, lumber, spices and perfumes.

The economy of the Indus civilization was similar to Mesopotamia in that both had an agriculture based on irrigation and fertility by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2. Mesopotamia and Egypt had many differences,, but they were both similar in one thing, “Both cultures were made possible by an agricultural surplus, in particular an access of grain (25, Standage).” It funded many a vast amount of public works/constructions to be possible such as canals, temples and pyramids and also freed a small elite of administrators and craftsmen from the need to produce their own food. Grain was the main national diet in both Mesopotamia and Egypt, refereed to as “edible money” because it was consumed in both liquid and solid form.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economically, both regions participated in trade that was under state control, and their economic growth was related to commerce. Although, Mesopotamia relied solely on imports, while Egypt had an import export system within its region along the Nile. Mesopotamia was…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia is often referred to as the first civilization in history. Named after it’s geographical location, “land between two rivers,” Mesopotamia was settled between the…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamian cities were built around distinct temples. Also, most of their people lived in a town/city. The cities of Mesopotamia had walls that protected them. However, Indus cities were not built around distinct temples or palaces. Their towns were planned more systematically and most of their people lived in small villages. However, they did had walls to protect their houses. Both cities had community baths and their houses were made of sun dried bricks or fired-dry bricks. The economy between Mesopotamia and Indus Valley depended on agriculture and trade. The difference between Egypt and the Indus Valley was that Egypt had a ruler, the pharoah that was in charge of the city, while Indus Valley didn’t. The weapons that each civilization had were made of bronze. Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Indus Valley had many differences between each other but the three civilizations made pottery, jewelry, and beads to trade them. At the end, each civilization was unique on their own living…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia and Egypt DBQ

    • 663 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mesopotamia was surrounded by most of the world's ancient highly developed and social complex states. Mesopotamia was considered one of the four riverine civilizations because at that time writing began or was invented and also, that’s when the Nile Valley in Egypt developed. Egypt was a second civilization that grew up in northeastern Africa, along the Nile River. The Egyptian civilization began its formation by 3000 B.C., which was mainly benefited by the Mesopotamia technological influence and trade, but differ from their culture and society.…

    • 663 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indus Valley Civilization

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Indus Valley civilization can best be described as urban because the civilization traded a lot among the different cities and countries around them. They traded things like metals, precious stones, timber, and other important things. They was also…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt and Mesopotamia developed a way of agriculture in order to provide food for their people and survive. Their agriculture techniques involved the construction of canals in order to bring water farther from the river, so their crops wouldn’t get destructed when the water from the river flow.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Egypt and Mesopotamia were both early agricultural societies built upon the water provided by the major rivers which sustained them, they exhibited important differences as a consequence of the different physical environments in which they developed. In this paper I will first focus on what I consider to be the major aspects of these differences in environment and then explore the consequences of these differences in their religious beliefs, political organization and commercial practices.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of environment, these two civilizations were formed in similar surroundings. They were both the earliest river-valleys to be charted by anthropologists. Because they were both formed near rivers, it’s no coincidence that the life of both of these places depended mainly on rivers. The Tigris and Euphrates rivers aided in Mesopotamian life, while the river Nile supporting the Nile civilization of Egypt. However, one difference between Mesopotamia and Egypt is the weather patterns of their respected localities. The Nile civilization admired and celebrated at the mineral waters that came in the favorably regular floods that provided lush vegetation and ease for society support, where in contrast, Sumerians had to settle for ruthless and unpredictable floods that lead towards more destruction than aid to their settlement.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ancient river-valley civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt share many similarities in their social, political, economic, intellectual, and cultural aspects, however, at the same time; both are very separate from one another. Mesopotamia developed first as a civilization without influence, while Egypt built off of the latter to create their own society, hence the shared traits of their educational system, government, religion, and social structure. But, the variable of location also takes place; once the basis of the civilizations were built, they branched off and continued to progress according to their own specific needs, which explains why the differences of the two lay in detail to the economy, intellect, government, and religion.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Mesopotamian civilization was a theocracy ruled by a monarchy which they believed to be divine in origin, Meaning kings derived their power from the gods and were in direct connection with the gods.The religion of the people of Mesopotamia was polytheistic, as they worshiped over 3000 gods and goddesses. The people believed the gods and goddesses owned the cities so each city had a temple that was built with much wealth. The temples owned much of the land and livestock. The temple was the center of the city as well as a political and economical center. There was three main social classes, nobles, commoners and slaves. Nobles included royal and priestly officials and their families. Commoners were the noble’s clients as they worked for the palace and temple as well as other common workers of the city. Slaves were owned by palace officials and were used for building project and weaving. The economy was based on agriculture. The valley between the Tigris and Euphrates is where the mesopotamian peoples thrived. The river valley is the main reason why the society survived and prospered being that their economy was based solely on agriculture. The law code of the people was based on the principle of retribution, (eye for an eye).…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Egypt and Mesopotamia were occupied by agricultural societies relying upon irrigation for crop yield. In Egypt, the Nile River overflowed its banks annually, depositing rich natural fertilizing elements that enabled Egyptians to grow wheat and barley, often providing a surplus. While the yearly rise of the Nile in Egypt was predictable, this was not the case in Mesopotamia. As a result, Mesopotamian cultures had to develop a system of canals to control flooding and redistribute the water over a greater area because the flood's were unpredictable. Both countries also had a hot, dry climate and fertile soil, good for supporting large populations.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Early civilizations were built near rivers because of the many resources and advantages of the rivers. RIvers could provide transportation, food, drink, and fertile soil. Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia were two river valley civilizations, and were very important to the beginning of mankind in the historic-era. A river valley civilization is deeply affected by the river it is situated upon. The river can affect all aspects of the life in the civilizations, including political aspects, economic aspects, religious aspects, social aspects, intellectual aspects, and architectural aspects. In Egyptian society, the Nile river was very consistent and predictable with its flooding, rather than Mesopotamia, where the Tigris and Euphrates rivers were very sporadic with their flooding, and caused Mesopotamian societies to be very different. One major difference between the Egyptian and Mesopotamian societies, was the government. In Egypt, there were many peasant villages all under one king, the Pharaoh. In Mesopotamia, there were city-states with kings to govern smaller areas because of the hectic rivers that surrounded Mesopotamia. There were also a lot of similarities between the two civilizations. They both had very religious centered societies and had polytheistic views. Also, they both traded a lot, and even fought wars over trade.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia lies between these two rivers. In greek, Mesopotamia is known as “land between the rivers”. These rivers were a huge essential need to the survival of the Mesopotamian civilization. Once a year, these rivers would flood. Floods are usually thought of as bad, but in this case they allowed for farming to thrive. When these rivers flooded, silt (mud/soil) was carried by them, which resulted in rich soil being placed all over the land. This allowed farmers to plant and harvest large amounts of wheat and barley. The rivers also provided food, water, and protection.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Four River Valleys

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First the four rivers all had a gradually warming and drying climate. Also dry soils and the reliance on seasonally flooding rivers and irrigation. Egypt had an advantage, in the delta region it supply all the things a farmer would need in the irrigation land in the south. Egypt had an abundance of food for a large population due to the floods that provided as a food source to the fertile. Most people lived off wheat and barley. However, in the Indus Valley the river was much more powerful than the Nile. The Indus Valley flooded twice a year; this allowed farmers to grow two crops all year, wheat and barley. Just like Egypt the Indus Valley depended on those two food sources to survive. The floodplain was broader in the Indus Valley but no region was as rich as the Nile delta. Egypt wealth came from the fullness of its agriculture. The Indus Valley focus was on territorial expansion to feed their population. The Nile and Indus Valley spilled and receded to a predictable rhythm but the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers could flood anytime. They didn’t just have floods that took part in their environment they also had desert…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays