Preview

Comparing The Life You Can Save, By Jon Sobrino And Peter Singer

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1507 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing The Life You Can Save, By Jon Sobrino And Peter Singer
Jon Sobrino and Peter Singer share with readers what it takes to live ethically in a world in which 22,000 children die each day from poverty-related issues. In The Principle of Mercy: Taking the Crucified People from the Cross, Sobrino emphasis that people must no longer turn a naked eye to the problems of the world and they should start living their life according to the gospel of Jesus Christ. In The Life You Can Save, Singer stresses the importance of an increase in monetary donation in attempts to cease poverty in the world. This paper will first address Sobrino’s methods for living an ethical life, according to the gospel. Additionally, it will focus on Singer’s approach to tackling world poverty by his advocacy for greater donation of …show more content…
Those living in first world countries should have as much interest as those living in third world countries, as they do in their own society. To be indifferent to others suffering is to be inhuman. In a global society, we are all connected to each and it is our duty to accept this true it we want to live ethically.
Living the Gospel/Action
Sobrino argues that there is a flaw in our reality. Human’s greatest enemy is material items. God calls us to live by the gospel; we must be merciful and compassionate. The only way we may be able to do that is if we follow God’s will and love others as we love oneself.
In order to live in God’s will, we have to worship God, not gods. What is inhibiting humans from worshiping God is the worshipping of idols, “it is not enough to go from ignorance to truth….it is pointless to aspire to truth unless we are willing to distill its consequences.” True God is at war with other gods. And, the ultimate evil in idols is that they need humans in order to exist. That is, if humans remain indifferent to other people’s pain, then they must be worshiping some other idol be it another god, money or, power. The solution is to rid the idols because they dehumanize their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter Singer’s essay The Singer Solution in World Poverty gives his opinion on how he thinks people should live in order to end world poverty. Within the country we live in people’s income have a wide spread range. A family with an income of $50,000 spends around $30,000 annually on necessities. With $20,000 left in remaining Singer believes that as much as possible should be given away to end world poverty. The luxuries that people spend money on is what is doomed as selfish.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter Singer's Solution

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this persuasive essay Peter covers a lot of emotional and disturbing topics. Although he is rite, some of his comparisons are very extreme. People around the world, and Americans especially are very greedy. Whatever you problems are, somebody in a 3rd world country has it ten times worse. I noticed that Peter used a lot of Legos, Pathos, and Ethos. He gave great examples of the morally wrong decisions we make every day that effect people around the world, and we don’t even know it.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer calculates that “$200 in donations would help a sickly 2-year-old transform into a healthy 6-year-old” (Singer 2). No one would say that spending money to help a child in need is wasteful; however, preserving the child’s life would not save it from poverty. The child would be alive, but it would still grow up poor and uneducated, and, in all likelihood, its children would be the same. Singer’s solution for poverty is, in all actuality, not a solution at all. His ideas would be great for lowering the fatality rate due to malnourishment or diseases, but he gives no solution to adequately deliver the world from poverty. Donating to children-saving charities, while honorable, does not do much in fixing the problem at hand, worldwide…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, Singer claims that the rich taste of people with money is starving children around the world. He also believes that if human beings have it to give, why don’t we give more to the people who have less. So, according to Singer, a possible solution to world poverty is for Americans to donate all extra income, which is not necessary for everyday living, to organizations that provide aid to other poor areas of the world. If more people donated their excess money to charitable agencies, that money could mean the difference between life and death for children in need, according to Singer.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer brings to light a very important global problem, poverty, and offers an extreme solution to solve this problem. Peter Singer argues that the solution to world poverty is living simply and giving all excess household money to charities. Singer uses effective examples to get his point across, but gives an unreasonable solution. He gives the example that the failure to donate money will directly result in the death of children in need. "Whatever money you're spending on luxuries, not necessities, should be given away." (Singer)…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    SOC 101 Final

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It seems that the external areas suffer the most and deserve our attention. With such an immense amount of power and resources spread across the world, the core nations should be ensuring that fellow human beings in the world are fairly treated and have enough food to eat. Capitalism or greed seems to be more important than humanitarian efforts.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Within his work, Peter Singer presents an argument that the people who live in affluent countries, the developed world, must drastically change their way of life and their conception of morality in order to help those in need. He begins by giving us an example of a case of famine, Bengal 1971, where people have been suffering and no one was doing anything to even try to alleviate the problem, this includes the government. I have summarized his arguments in the following ways: 1. Suffering caused by the lack of food, shelter, and medical care services is bad, and 2. If we can prevent something bad from happening, without sacrificing something…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For those who frightened much to abandon their life, goals, projects and interests in order to save one’s life, say goodbye to righteousness. In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, also in “ the life you can save”, Peter Singer tries to show that we human beings have a moral obligation to give far more than we actually do for excessive and tragic situations such as famine and disaster relief. According to singer, Giving, sharing and helping the needy is more than moral happiness and inner satisfaction, it is a moral duty. As he state his argument in three premises, “1, suffering and death from the lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad, (2), if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening,…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Billionaire Sacrifice

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Singer begins his essay with a simple question, “What is a human life worth?” (578). “Singer suggests that most people would be unwilling to a value on the life another human”. Singer continues the topic by writing about some of the charitable beliefs of Bill Gates and how it was that Gates developed some of those values over time, which was in part due to hearing about a viral infection that kills around five hundred million children each year. Singer then goes on to give a statistic that around a billion people must survive on the equivalent of “less than one U.S. dollar per day” and that “more than ten million children die every year . . . from avoidable, poverty-related…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Response to Peter Singer

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Everyday wealthy and middle class Americans across the country spend money on luxury items such as: flat screen televisions, laptop computers, digital cameras, fancy cars, and smart phones. At the same time, across the globe in poverty stricken countries, people and children are living in destitution. Many of these people lack a basic human need which commonly includes nutrition, healthcare, education, clothing, shelter, and clean water. Peter Singer, author of 'The Singer Solution to World Poverty', suggests that all Americans that are financially stable to donate should be donating all their non-essential money to the needy people across the globe. This seems like the morally right thing to do, however Singers argument overlooks many factors in his bias, and leaves to many questions unanswered to make his essay true or reasonable to any extent. Is it morally right to make a hardworking American give up all luxuries to the needy people they will never meet? Of course, Americans should feel the need to donate to the needy people of our world. Although the amount they donate should be entirely up to them.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the issue of poverty by suggesting Americans give away most of their income to aid those in need. Singer believes that withholding income is the equivalence of letting a child starve to death. Therefore, Singer suggests the ethical thing to do to end world hunger is to give up everyday luxuries. Although donating a vast amount of money could help dying and starving children, Singer’s proposition is not only unrealistic but also too demanding for everyday Americans who have responsibilities of their own.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    At this moment, many people around the world are starving to death. Should we help them? Do we have a moral obligation to provide aid? People have very different views on this topic. An examination of essays by Peter Singer and by John Arthur gives insight into two of the many different opinions concerning the responsibility the affluent people have to the much less fortunate people. Also, these philosophers give explanations of the moral responsibility of society.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, the author Peter Singer wrote a few hypothetical examples to prove his moral judgments, in which he tried to persuade the readers to give away all the money one spends on luxuries via the example of Bob, a man who spared the innocent kids life trying to save his valuable Bugatti. However, the example of Bob failed to convince me as a good analogy for other people.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays