Preview

Comparing The Harder They Come And The Mighty Quinn

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
790 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing The Harder They Come And The Mighty Quinn
Throughout both films The Harder they Come and The Mighty Quinn the characters face many major choices to make. Both Ivan in The Harder they Come and Maubee in The Mighty Quinn faced difficult decisions that were caused by postcolonial-independence. Both films difficulties were stemmed because of the influence of other countries in theirs at the time. The Harder They Come features the issues Jamaicans faced in the Ganja trade, which was controlled by other countries. The Mighty Quinn features Americans that work at a local hotel. This film showed the hardships that the tourism brought about with the power struggle. There are both similarities and differences in how both characters, Ivan and Maubee, deal with these issues and make these hard …show more content…
The movie begins with a hotel owner being dead. Maubee found him dead, covers up the crime and steals a lot of American money. After this, Maubee goes off making bets with it on the run. He did not go to the hotel planning to steal the money. Also near the end Maubee puts a deadly snake with the money because he knows he has been caught. There was no way for Maubee too know he would have to give the money up soon. Therefore it is safe to assume he did not know the American’s where on their way to place the snake in the sack. Maubee does this on impulse while Quinn has a gun to his head. All of Maubees choices where also based on impulse because of the money he …show more content…
For one, Ivan choices become much more violent. In the begging of the film Ivan is not very violent. The first violent encounter he has is after the pastor kicks him off the property. Ivan returns to the property and ends up cutting a man’s throat fighting over a bike. It seems as though Ivan does not kill the man. Near the end of the film is where Ivan really turns to violence. First, an officer tries to pull him over while transporting marijuana. Ivan panic he shoots the officer. After being on the run, Ivan finds himself in, and out of another officer shoot out. Ivan then decides to flee Jamaica and tries to catch a boat but does not make it. He awakes on the beach surrounded by officers one last time. Ivan then chooses to shoot his last few bullets at the officers instead of going to prison. The officers then kill Ivan. Ivan chooses more violent paths than he needed too throughout the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One powerful, one small, this is the base of the biblical story David and Goliath. The story, in which a not so strong hero takes down a strong and powerful leader, is much like McMurphy and Nurse Ratched in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. The match up between McMurphy and Nurse Ratched is a raging and intense one. Through out the novel, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, McMurphy and Nurse Ratched have always had conflict, as well as a sense of never-ending hatred and disagreement towards each other; which as the novel continues, grows stronger and stronger. Undoubtedly, despite the chaos and tension between them, McMurphy gets the better of the match up, thanks to his ability to manipulate people, his bravery, and his popularity.…

    • 732 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His assistance Ivan is dangerous is to because the general let’s Ivan torture you if you don’t escape and win the general. The general is dangerous because he plays dangerous games like let you have three hours to run away then the next day hes going to come and hunt you down and kill you. He the general is dangerous by letting his pack of dogs chase you and hunt you down.”You have killed my best dog but now i’m going to use all of my dogs”.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan Denisovich Shukov

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In conclusion, Ivan Denisovich Shukov is sentenced to 10 years in the work camp because he was accused of treason, which he didn’t actually commit. Shukov knows that he is innocent, but he also know there is nothing he can do about it. In the labor camp in Siberia he is put to work all day for no pay in the freezing cold, he gets little food, and works along side all types of men. Shukov has almost know freedom in this prison, but he manages to take advantage of what he can by learning new skills, leaving time for himself, and making relationships with the people around…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment centers on Raskolnikov, a man who chooses to murder a common pawnbroker while he struggles with guilt, alienation, and pride. The choice to commit murder creates a division between Raskolnikov and society because he violates the moral laws governing society. In Crime and Punishment, the rift between Raskolnikov and society is both alienating and enriching for his character and demonstrates Dostoevsky’s opinion of an individual’s place in society.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan IV (The Terrible)

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Without a leader, his people begged for him to return. He made a deal with the Muscovites, that if he came back and led them, he would get absolute power and control of the area, with the ability to punish traitors and lawbreakers with confiscation of property and execution. This state he created was called the Oprichnina. When he returned to rule, he began executing all of the local boyars, who he believed had killed his mother and his wife and then started his reign of terror for 24 years upon all of the boyars of Russia. At this point in his reign of terror, he was four times remarried but still had not succeeded in recapturing the happiness that he enjoyed with Anastasia. Also during this time, through the Oprichnina, Ivan IV created his own private army to act as bodyguards and secret police, called the Oprichniki. The Oprichniki contained 1,000-6,000 men. He destroyed all of the major Boyar families in the area and not just the men, he ordered the execution of women and children as well. One of his worst displays of terror is the sacking of Novgorod. Novgorod was a very wealthy city and was a strategic defense point for the Livonian war. Vasilyevich was paranoid, and believed that the city would defect to the enemy, so Ivan sent the Oprichniki to pillage Novgorod and all areas around it. He killed thousands of families and left nothing behind. All of the lands that he claimed was given to his chosen class of gentry. He tortured his enemies and even friends for simply displeasing him. He boiled them in oil, cut out their tongues, and impaled them on spikes, starting at the top, the more the person moved, the faster the spike would move through them, and this was a very long and drawn out death. This and many other heinous displays of rage led him to be nicknamed “Grozny”. This roughly translates to formidable or sparking terror or fear. The…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan does not accept God's ethical system of "allowing" evil to occur, because he believes that God is omnipotent and has the power to stop it. On the other, Swinburne might comment by mentioning how Ivan uses the fallacy of ad populum by involving God when God has nothing to do with the choices people make; since God, like a good father delegating responsibility, gave us free will to use it for good, but humans are the cause for evil since they use free will to harm rather than help. I would rebuttal as to ask Ivan if he truly believes God allows evil in the world then he must also agree that there is no such thing as free will. With a divine being, being the cause of everything evil in the world, then us, humans, have no power or responsibility over the choices we make. Therefore, there is no purpose in rejecting God's ethical system since you are determined to obey his ethical system and you would have no control over your own actions just as everyone else. Lastly, Swinburne and I might conclude to say that Ivan has a biased argument due to his specific view on the suffering of children, as mentioned in the chapter Rebellion, and not the overall aspect of…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Thompson, 2012, p.63). After being orphaned at the age of eight, it is reasonable to say that Ivan IV went through difficulties that he may not have encountered had his parents survived. This sad beginning to his childhood was only the start and the years…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the movie and book progress we are introduced to the protagonists. Doctor Zhivago introduces us to Yuri Zhivago, a poet and doctor; while One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich introduces us to Ivan Denisovich Shukhov, a prisoner in a labor camp who has been imprisoned for 8 years. Both characters, when looking at them by society means, are opposites of each other. Yuri has a better life than Ivan, he has a love life, food, and he does not have to worry about surviving throughout the day. Yuri is a free man, while Ivan is not. Though these two characters are very different, they do share some similarities. Yuri and Ivan both have an item that means a lot to them, something that reminds them of where they are from. Yuri has his balalaika, a Russian triangular instrument, who his mother gave to him; while Ivan has the spoon that he made himself while in the camp. The balalaika reminds Yuri of his deceased mother, someone that is dear to him. Ivan’s spoon gives him a sense of civilization and dignity, an object to remind him to never forget he is a human, and to never…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The Real Thing” and “The Beast in the Jungle” are similar in that both stories discuss the concept of someone trying to acquire something only to realize that he doesn’t actually want it. In “The Real Thing”, the artist is looking for the perfect upper class couple, while in “The Beast in the Jungle”, Marcher is looking to share the feelings of May.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hidden

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was interesting that the journey of Goran’s inner soul began as a young man that was innocent and giving could later turn into such a cold blooded killer. How could one go from helping families in need to enjoying watching prisoners beg for their life and explaining how nice it was to kill (Drakulic 1123)? Goran was on a power struggle and began killing old men, young men, and even…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Symbolism In The Nadsat

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Here, Alex is violent again, choosing evil he thinks is as valid as choosing good and removing it away against his will doesn’t mean that he had ceased to desire or satisfy him. The same happens with two of his exfriends that despite becoming policemen, when they meet Alex, do not hesitate to beat him up, enjoying it. This is reflected by the pastor of prison, saying that if the choice of good is not a free choice then it means…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, his wickedness is highlighted when he laughs at the group that dies due to building their jurta doors to open out and consequently, ending up trapped inside when it snows. In chapter 73, after the first snowstorm breaks, the prisoners notice a jurta completely covered in snow. After surveying the scene, Ivanov laughingly comments, “‘four of them are dead in there! Stupid pigs’” (Sepetys 287). He displays a complete disregard for the lives of the prisoners and even mocks the circumstances that led to their death. Evident in this disregard is Ivanov’s malevolent nature as he devalues the lives of thousands and merely laughs as the prisoners die the most horrific of deaths. Similarly, Ivanov’s complete lack of conscience is shown again when he guiltlessly mocks Lina and her situation as she begs him for something to help her ill mother. In chapter 79, Lina, in complete desperation, works up the courage to go and beg Ivanov for anything that may aid the recovery of her sick mother. She has only just revealed that her mother is unwell when he, in mock concern, replies, “‘give her plenty of sunshine, fresh fruits, and lots of vegetables’” (313). The thought of a child desperately trying to save their mother’s life is nothing but amusing to Ivanov and he taunts their pleas and helplessness. Thus, Ivanov’s villainous nature is once again revealed as he, despite absolutely…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In both stories, both men took on the responsibility to provide means for their respected families. They were hard at work, even with the odds being against…

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rattler

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The setting has a peaceful and calm effect on the reader. The event takes place in the desert after sunset; the writer describes the setting in a way where if you were in the desert on a cool evening you wouldn’t think that you would come upon any danger or threat to your life. The writer writes, “Light was thinning; the scrub’s dry savory odors were sweet on the cooler air. In this, the first pleasant moment for a walk after long blazing hours, I thought I was the only thing abroad.” The writer used a series of selection of detail and language to create an atmosphere that at first showed that the man was alone and relaxed until he came upon the snake.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main character, Raskolnikov, is Dostoevsky's focus for his exploration of duality in character. "Raskol" in Russian means "schism" or "split." This name gives an inside view to Raskolnikov. He is torn between a conscience that urges him to do good and a cruelly rational side that pushes him to do evil. His conscience urges him to be generous and benevolent with those that are less fortunate than he. At one point, Raskolnikov sees a young girl drunk on the street with a lecherous old man trailing behind her. Raskolnikov finds a nearby policeman and takes him to the scene. "I saw myself watching her and following her, but I prevented him, and he is just waiting for me to go away...Think how can we keep her out of his hands, and how are we to get her home?...Here, "said Raskolinikov, feeling in his pockets and finding twenty copecks, "here, call a cab and tell him to drive her to her address." (43). Then after he thinks about it and his other side has a chance to rationalize, he regrets his actions. "He [the policeman] has carried off my twenty copecks," Raskolnikov murmurs angrily when he is left alone. "Well, let him take as much from that other fellow to allow him to have the girl and so will it end. And why did I want to interfere? Is it for me to help? Have I any right to help? Let them devour each other alive-what is it to me?" (45). There are other instances of this contradictory behavior throughout the novel. Raskolnikov gives money to the family of a friend after the friend dies and then as soon as he leaves, he berates himself for giving away his money. He valiantly defends Sonia to Svidrigailov then later ridicules her for her belief in God.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays