Preview

Comparing Relative And Radiometric Dating

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1005 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Relative And Radiometric Dating
When most people hear the term fossil dating, two things come to mind, one being, “Is that what you’re grandparents do?” (Valls, biology class) and two, “what is that?”. By using either relative or radioactive dating methods, most geologists have the ability to tell how old a single fossil is. As always though, we are left with the question of which is better? Delve deeper to understand the comparisons and contrasts of Relative and Radiometric dating, as well as further information on both topics individually.

Relative Dating

Relative dating is not the term used to describe what rednecks do on the weekend. (Get it Mr. Valls?) Relative dating is the ability to put a series of events or objects, rock layers for example, into chronological
…show more content…
This task would go by a lot quicker if all fossils came with a time stamp. But when it comes down to it, two fossil dating techniques seem to unmask themselves as accurate ways of dating fossil and or other elements. Relative and radiometric dating are both extremely effective, although they vary in techniques.They do have some similarities. A few similarities between the two would include the fact that they are, obviously, both able to approximate an age for organic and non-organic elements. They both have the ability to find the ages on organic and non-organic elements using predetermined knowledge of the world around those elements. Both exercise the brain’s ability to work out difficult scientific and mathematic equations. As far as similarities go, the list has all in all come up short, but the differences are drastic. Some differences between relative and radiometric dating are the fact that while relative dating uses linear sedimentary rocks and stratigraphy to estimate the age of the element, radiometric dating uses the decaying of isotopes in organic and non-organic elements to be able to calculate an almost exact ago on the fossil or artifact. Personally I think that’s totally rad. They also vary in dependability. Relative dating has multiple outlying, constantly changing variables, as well as not very liable information. It is subsequently just a somewhat accurate observation/guessing game. While radiometric dating derives from basic elemental make up itself. Radiometric dating is said to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mg2 Unit 9 Study Guide

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. Given that the half life of the radioisotope carbon -14 is 5730 years, it would not be useful in dating bones that are over a million years old. After 40 000 years of age less than 1% of the 14C is left in the bone and thus it is not useful for determining the exact age beyond that.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * A radioisotope like 14-carbon can be used to detect the age of a biological material less than 50,000 years old.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 25 Pre Test Paper

    • 4419 Words
    • 18 Pages

    they showed how radiometric dating could be used to give the absolute ages of rocks and fossils…

    • 4419 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inner Fish Chapter Summary

    • 5067 Words
    • 21 Pages

    1. The author and his colleagues wanted to use 375 million old rock, because in the 385 million year old rocks they found what look like fish. In the 365 million year old rocks they found amphibians that did not look like fish, so to find the change the look at the 375 million year old rock to find transition between the two. In their paleontology work in 2004 they found sedimentary rocks in Pennsylvania and on the east coast of Greenland, but their most successful rock was found in the Artic of Canada.…

    • 5067 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Potassium-Argon dating is a form of radiometric dating which tells us the absolute age of rocks. Practically all elements are radioactive to some extent, some more than others. Moreover, different isotopes of elements are more radioactive than others. Isotopes are forms of a particular atom that varies in the number of neutrons in the nucleus. For instance, K-40 is a naturally occurring isotope of Potassium is far more radioactive than its siblings K-39 and K-41 because K-40 is much less stable.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lab 7

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Because it gives us a number but there is still a range on the amount of error. Because absolute dates through radioactive dating are really only for igneous/metamorphic rocks and because heat and pressure affect the dates, therefore not making them absolute.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The age of these strata is able to be determined due to the fossils that are found within the rock layer. Along with radioactive dating the igneous rocks that can be found near sediments that contain the same…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Current research into extinct megafauna and extant Australian species revoles heavily around the finding off fossils. Fossils provide Palentologists with information about the similarities and differences between species, deducing certain evolutionary relationships. Other research includes radiometric dating, providing dates for when fauna died and the possible cause. Ideas about…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biology: Key Questions

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Given that the half-life of the radioisotope carbon-14 is 5730 years, how useful do you think this isotope would be for dating bones that are over a million years old?…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Geology Ch. 1 Study Guide

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Relative dating- events are placed in their proper sequence/ order without knowing their age in years.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guns Germs Steel

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jared Diamond uses a variety of resources to answer Yali’s question. He uses radio carbon evidence to show when and where certain plants or animals were…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bio 201 Review

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Radiometric dating can be used to determine the absolute age of rocks strata because a radioactive parent isotope decays to a daughter isotope at a constant rate. The rate of decay is measured in half life. Measurement of magnetism…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two general processes used to figure out the age of rocks is relative dating and radiometric dating. We will compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of both methods.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are some incredibly specific items that need to be present in order for fossils to be procured, and they are only found in water, caves, or volcanoes. There is also a geological an scale, there needs to be dating, relative and absolute, by finding this fossils you now possess a better view of the times and are able to reconstruct ancient environments, which include climate and habitat reconstruction. Water needs to be present including sand, generally these are found around or in a lake, then there are caves, and volcanoes are an area because of the ash are the conditions and places for fossilization.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Radiometric Dating Methods

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the area where we discovered these fossils, there are known volcanoes that are active or that were active in Ethiopia. Our first dating method we used was radiometric dating, this method relies on the decay of naturally occurring radioactive isotopes (WoldeGabriel, 2009). When we first uncovered the fossils we saw that is was between two layers of volcanic ash and the ash had been deposited in the fossils. Once the dating method was done each fossil dated back to 4.4 million years ago (WoldeGabriel, 2009). To back up the date, I used another method called Biostratigraphic dating which uses the association of fossils in the strata to determine each layer’s approximate age (Shook, 2016). I used this dating method because I found the fossils in two different location and I wanted to figure out if they had any correlation with each other. The layers revealed that they are both 4 million years old, which makes the age of the fossil accurate.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays