Comparing Mary Shelley's Frankenstein And Sir Walter Scott
Novels are read to experience a fantasy created by the author. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein was no exception. The journey described was original and exciting. This novel originality was accepted differently by different identities. Such examples are Sir Walter Scott, who considered the work superb while a “Quarterly Review” editor considered it to be on the verge of insanity. These two authors use different and similar rhetorical styles to convey their opinions.
The most glaring difference between the two writer’s passages is their plot summaries. Sir Walter Scott glorified the plot as he quoted parts from the novel. This glorification of the plot gives the reader a sensation of greatness throughout the novel, not just what Sir Walter had quoted.
The most glaring difference between the two writer’s passages is their plot summaries. Sir Walter Scott glorified the plot as he quoted parts from the novel. This glorification of the plot gives the reader a sensation of greatness throughout the novel, not just what Sir Walter had quoted.