Preview

Comparing King Lear's 'Tuesdays With Morrie'

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1374 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing King Lear's 'Tuesdays With Morrie'
Jaskeran Nijjar
Mr. Sondhi
ENG4U
May 5th 2014
ALS through the eyes of royalty
All through the classic play of William Shakespeare 's King Lear, if examined cautiously (use diff word), numerous characteristics from the novel Tuesdays with Morrie can be applied when the two works of fiction are compared. To be able to successfully evaluate narrative pieces like King Lear by the side of Tuesdays with Morrie throughout a comparative lens, the individual must consider the literary pieces very closely, keeping in mind how the characters interrelate amongst one another, particularly paying very close attention to the aspects of both emotional and psychical distress. When an individual is in a position of power, they tend to think higher of themselves
…show more content…
In this statement Mitch is talking about Morrie’s withered frame that is depicted to be harsh reality. Morrie is living his life fighting a authoritative disease like ALS which is making it harder to live everyday like it is his last. On another note Lear is living a life in which he has full authority of , along with all power to control the lives of others. When comparing the two works of fiction, it is evidently seen that Morrie is perceived as wiser as he is dealing with a life altering disorder. Morrie is living his life in complete misery whereas Lear is living his life knowing he can make others miserable. This can be seen when Goneril states “Then we must look from his age to receive not alone the imperfections of grafted condition, but therewithal the unruly waywardness that infirm and choleric years bring with them" (I.I 296-299). From this Lear’s actions that had once been his flaws are now considerably known to be his deep-rooted habits. According to his daughter Goneril, Lear is known to have many faults within him that have now become a part of his authoritative personality. Morrie exists knowing that the following day will always be more challenging then beforehand, which for some people is known as living in fear. Morrie’s optimistic personality does …show more content…
Morrie 's wise personality allows him to omit any situation that may lead to destruction in his life. Morrie believes that love is the only sensible act that a human can execute. This is shown when morrie himself quotes "Levine said it right. He said, 'Love is the only rational act '"(Albom 52). This shows that Morrie believes that love has the power to cure people, both the ones who give it and the ones who receive it. King Lear faces many decisions in which he must decide between his daughters. Lear believed that love is something that was so mandatory in his life that he had demanded it from his family. This can be seen when Lear himself states "Have more than you show, speak less than you know." As earlier stated, Morrie Schwartz is depicted as wiser than Lear, due to the fact Morries is able to live such a life in which he believes that love the only sensible

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Wisdom is a trait mostly associated with the elderly and highly valued in today’s world. However, do all old men truly possess wisdom merely because they can see their own deaths in the near future? In both King Lear by William Shakespeare and Tuesdays with Morrie by Mitch Albom, the protagonists acquire wisdom after undergoing trials of sufferings and tribulations. Despite learning similar lessons, both of these men begin their quest as completely different people. Morrie, the main character in Tuesdays with Morrie emphasizes the value of family and love, while King Lear on the other hand sees these values as insignificant pursuits which at best can be used to elevate his ego. Morrie is disappointed by the way things are in his society; contrarily King Lear initially shows no sign of concern nor does he significantly care for his community. Morrie’s views on death suggest that it is a natural process that is essentially an ideal way to live, whereas King Lear still strives to live a kingly life in spite of his agreements to divide his land between his daughters. Although King Lear and Morrie differ completely in both character and beliefs, initially the two men come to acquire true wisdom and knowledge by experiencing a fact of life which one can regard as a phenomena; death.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Who is a hero? Is he the one who risks all in order to gain all or is he the one who is radically transformed in the pursuit of a goal? A hero should privilege optimism over nihilism. Every great movement on this earth owes its growth to great personalities. Movements, started with an idea from an independent mind. Some motivated by poverty, others by misery. Similarly, the protagonists in The Children of Men and King Lear were motivated by various factors. The protagonists in The Children of Men and King Lear, Theo and Lear go through life-changing experiences which eventually highlight their inner personality. The protagonist with the better metamorphosis eventually triumphs. Upon close examination it would seem that both characters share similar climacteric changes. Each is unwilling to maintain power and yet, is transformed by other characters and children.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Brian Blessed production of King Lear most closely resembles a Christian tragedy approach to the text in that it shows suffering as meaningful and links it with redemption. This view of the play accepts the disproportion between fault and punishment and sees death as a release from the world’s cares.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through ‘The Tragedy of King Lear’, Shakespeare represents a distinctive voice in which influences the way we perceive the role of power play in our world as it broadens our understanding of the universality and complexity of power play. Compared with the 21st century film ‘Brassed Off’, we are presented with an insight into the various means of attaining power and its ability to uncover the true nature of people within their struggle for supremacy and control. Shakespeare presents 'The Tragedy of King Lear' as the struggle for power and the political and filial machinations that the desire for power can create. Shakespeare focuses the distinctive voice around the central character King Lear who represents a conceited oppressor whose fall from power prompts the downfall of the Kingdom that he once controlled. The main cause of his demise is his failure to understand and possess a clear vision of the people around him. In Lear's eyes, he sees his eldest daughter Goneril’s facade to be a loyal and true expression, 'Sir I love you more than word can wield the matter/Dearer than eyesight, space and liberty', although Lear's inability to see the truth results in his manipulation and the banishing of his loyal acquaintances; his youngest daughter Cordelia and his dear friend Kent. Although Lear can physically see, it is the understanding, awareness and direction that he lacks and is blind to. In contrast to Lear being physically capable of seeing, Gloucester becomes physically blind but gains the form of vision that Lear lacks, and consequently Gloucester evades a corollary comparable to Lear's. Here Shakespeare presents his distinctive voice on power play through the depiction of the manipulation and motivation behind the characters struggle for sovereignty. His clever use of his characters and their relationships allows us to gain an insight into the condition of the human psyche throughout their individual attempts at power and highlights the complexities associated…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do all old men truly possess wisdom because they can see their death on the horizon? Wisdom is a valued trait in our society today. In both King Lear by William Shakespeare and Tuesdays with Morrie by Mitch Albom, the main characters were able to acquire wisdom after undergoing trials and tribulations. However, both of these men began their quest as completely different people. Morrie always emphasized the value of family and of love, while King Lear saw these qualities that could be used to boot his ego. Morrie was disappointed by the way things were in society, while King Lear did not care much about it and accepted it the way it was. Morrie viewed death as a natural thing and an ideal way to live, while King Lear still wanted to live life as a King despite giving and dividing his land between his daughters. Regardless of being very different character wise and beliefs, both King Lear and Morrie came to achieve wisdom by experiencing the fact of life; otherwise known as death.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many of the plays by William Shakespeare, the central character goes through internal and external changes that ultimately shake their foundations to the core. Numerous theories have been put forth to explain the sequence of tragedies Shakespeare wrote during this period by linking it to some experience of melancholy, anger, despair, and the antagonist 's ultimate fall from grace in their lust for power. But such theories overlook the fact that it is in this very same period and in the same tragic works that portray the heights to which human nature can rise and fall in its purest and noblest, if not happiest terms. Surely the creation of so much light alongside the darkness and the perfection of the artistic medium through which Shakespeare gives them expression argues against the idea that the greedy side of human nature is his chief concern. His efforts to portray human life in its rarest form and not only the dark depths, but also the treasure rooms of our being. He tries to pierce beneath the superficial motives and forces of surface behavior, social, and cultural expressions and to the deeper levels of individual character and human nature. Shakespeare then places these aspects of human existence in their true relation to the wider field of universal life. In relation to the tragic hero, there are many similarities between the tragic heroes in Macbeth and King Lear. However, the differences between the two outline the re-occurring themes in both plays. In Shakespeare 's plays the central characters ' own weaknesses and lust for power lead to corruption. The unchecked power in Shakespeare 's Macbeth and King Lear ultimately leads to corruption, tragedy, and the hero 's fall from grace.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Essay

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although Edgar is not truly mad in the play King Lear by William Shakespeare, he portrays himself as a madman to the other characters in the play when disguised as Poor Tom, and when rescuing his father. Edgar uses madness and mad tactics to save Gloucester, befriend and comfort King Lear, and hide from prosecution. Edgar rescues his father while giving him hope to live and befriends King Lear as Poor Tom.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The infamous playwright, William Shakespeare’s, King Lear relays the story of a tragic hero and his family while paralleling it to the sub-plot within the tragedy. The story of these two reflecting groups of characters displays the obliteration of once potent characters’ power, and the inversion of social order. King Lear, the father of Goneril, Regan and Cordelia experiences a digressing journey comparable to that of Gloucester, the father of Edmund, his illegitimate son, and Edgar. Both Lear and Gloucester make a reprehensible decision in confiding in their children that they thought were the most honorable, but were faced with…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear's Dementia

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Shakespeare, William, and Russell A. Fraser. The Tragedy of King Lear. New York: New American Library, 1986. Print.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “By considering the dramatic effects of King Lear, evaluate the view that despite the appalling suffering, the world of the play is not without hope.”…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Fool and Cordelia are similarly candid towards their King, they never interact in Shakespeare's King Lear, because the Fool is a chaotic influence while Cordelia is a stabilizing force. While the Fool and Cordelia both act in the Lear's best interest, it is not always evident to Lear. The Fool's actions often anger the King, and lead to an increase in his madness. On the other hand, Cordelia's actions more often soothe Lear, and coax him back into sanity. Another commonality between the Fool and Cordelia is their honesty. Both the Fool and Cordelia are frank with Lear, though he may not always appreciate that they do so for his own good.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Essay

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Motifs and symbols are often used to enrich a literary text. Identify one or more symbols, motifs or strands of imagery and explore the role which they play in King Lear…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Sanity of Hamlet

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In both Hamlet and King Lear, Shakespeare incorporates a theme of madness with two characters: one truly mad, and one only acting mad to serve a motive. The madness of Hamlet is frequently disputed. This paper argues that the contrapuntal character in each play, namely Ophelia in Hamlet and Edgar in King Lear, acts as a balancing argument to the other character's madness or sanity. King Lear's more decisive distinction between Lear's frailty of mind and Edgar's contrived madness works to better define the relationship between Ophelia's breakdown and Hamlet's "north-north-west" brand of insanity. Both plays offer a character on each side of sanity, but in Hamlet the distinction is not as clear as it is in King Lear. Using the more explicit relationship in King Lear, one finds a better understanding of the relationship in Hamlet.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Essay

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justice is the quality of being a reasonable and unbiased party whenever it is needed. In a just and morally driven society justice presides over mercy as the greater essential need within a human civilization. In William Shakespeare’s King Lear it is shown how justice trumps mercy through the King’s loss of the throne, the God’s cruelty and the horrid treatment of Lear by his two daughters.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Do all old men truly possess wisdom because they can see their death on the horizon? Wisdom is a very valued and respected trait in our society and is associated with the elderly. In both King Lear by William Shakespeare and Tuesdays with Morrie by Mitch Albom, the protagonists were able to acquire wisdom after undergoing trials and tribulations. However, both these men began their quest as completely different people, polar opposites even. Morrie always emphasized the value of family and love, while King Lear saw these as trivial pursuits which at best can be used to elevate his ego. Morrie was disappointed by the way things were in his society, while initially King Lear did not care too much for it and accepted it. Morrie viewed death as completely natural and even an ideal way to live, while King Lear still wanted to live the life of a king despite dividing his land between his daughters. Despite being very different in both character and beliefs initially, both King Lear and Morrie came to acquire true wisdom by experiencing a fact of life which we regard as a phenomena; death.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays