Comparing In Flanders Fields 'And Dulce Et Decorum Est'

The poems “In Flanders Fields” by John McCrae and “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen are both magnificent poems that are based on the same theme, from the same time period and written in similar circumstances. However, these two poems present such different points of view.
Both John McCrae and Wilfred Owen were poets and soldiers during World War One, but they both had different roles and experiences in the war, so it makes sense that each of their poems are different, and relate to what they personally went through. John McCrae was posted as a medical officer, and took care of fallen soldiers. McCrae wrote the renowned poem “In Flanders Fields” the day after presiding over the funeral and burial of his friend Lieutenant Alex Helmer. This funeral shaped John McCrae’s outlook on war, which was revealed throughout his poetry. Wilfred Owen’s outlook on the war is dramatically different than McCrae’s because of his own two traumatic experiences. These traumatic experiences sent him to a treatment center, where
“In Flanders Fields” is concerned with remembrance for those who died in a glorious, and important battle that was worth fighting for, and asks people, both soldiers and Canadian citizens, to both remember the dead and continue the fight. After witnessing the death of his friend, John McCrae wanted soldiers to never be forgotten. On the other hand, in the poem “Dulce et Decorum Est,” Owen describes the horror and ugliness of the war. There was no glory to be had, hence the last verse, “To children ardent for some desperate glory, 
The old Lie; Dulce et Decorum est 
Pro patria mori,” which basically states that you would not tell your children that the war was glorious. The poem “In Flanders Fields” glorifies the war, while “Dulce et Decorum Est” is a warning against