Comparing the effect of flooding in MEDCs and LEDCs: Boscastle and Bangladesh:
The main difference between floods in MEDCs and LEDCs are the impacts of floods in each place. Very similar floods produce severely worse effects in Ledcs than they do in Medcs. The Boscastle and Bangladesh floods were essentially very similar in terms of amount of rain and water that flooded the land, never the less in Boscastle, despite there being severe damage to property and the whole of the town being flooded, there were no deaths. In contrast in Bangladesh there were over 1000 deaths due to the flooding itself, and many more died due to injury and disease related to the flood. On top of this 30 million people in Bangladesh were made homeless in contrast to only a few in Boscastle, who were only left homeless for a short time.
One of the main reasons why the impacts of a flood in a ledc and a Medcs is because of the quality of infrastructure n those countries. In an Medcs the infrastructure is likely to be well made and strong, as money has been put into it to make it long lasting and of a good quality, thus in natural disasters such as floods less damage is done, and so less people lose their homes, there is less rubble to clear up, it is less likely for conditions to become insanitary due to burst sewage systems and there will be less injury due to falling buildings. On the other hand in an Ledc, such as Bangladesh, there is much less money in the economy and with 83% of the population living on less than two dollars a day, they cannot afford to buy houses that are made well. Thus they are much more easily destroyed and so many people lost their houses in the 1998 floods, becoming homeless and causing the countries problems to spiral out of hand. Also the weak infrastructure caused sewage and work works to be ruptured and the drinking water mixed with sewage rendering it insanitary and it caused many to die or diseases such as dysentery and cholera.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document