Preview

Comparing Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King on Unjust Laws

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
919 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King on Unjust Laws
In today’s society, it is often unclear where to draw the line between good morals and effective government. It is for this reason that many times, laws that are enacted for the “good of the people” can be in direct conflict with a person’s conscience. Due to the various struggles that the United States has faced in building a government, this topic has been a popular discussion throughout American literature. Although they did not live during the same time, American writers Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King, Jr. each wrote about how a person should not follow laws that they believe to be immoral. Thoreau’s main concern pertained to the legal existence of slaves and slave-owners, and a century later, King spoke out against legal segregation in the South. In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Martin Luther King, Jr. shares the same attitude with Henry David Thoreau’s work, “Civil Disobedience” concerning just and unjust laws; however, they each had different means of executing their beliefs.

Both men agree that if a law is unjust, it is one’s duty to break that law, and do instead what they believe to be right. Thoreau considers that when unjust laws exist, a person has three choices of action: obey them, obey them while working to change them, or transgress them at once. He proposes, “It is not a man 's duty…to devote himself to the eradication of…even the most enormous wrong; …but it is his duty, at least, to wash his hands of it, and…not to give it practically his support.” (Thoreau 4). Thoreau also ponders whether it is better to decide what is right and wrong by one’s own conscience. He declares, "It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume, is to do at any time what I think right." (Thoreau 1). King, who was a devout clergyman, places one’s moral obligations under the eyes of God. He defines a just law as “…a man-made code that squares with the…law of God.”



Cited: King Jr., Martin Luther. "Letter from Birmingham Jail". 50 Essays. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin 's, 2004. Print. Thoreau, Henry David. “Civil Disobedience”. Part One. September 27, 2011.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. both shared a similar theme in their writing, which was their passion for equality. These two authors both desperately longed for fairness amongst the people of our nation. Though the stories of Thoreau and King were similar, how they went about it differed.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Thoreau and King rely heavily on ethos to get their points across. The intended audience of both is similar; a group of people with similar morals as the writers, but who have neglected action for various reasons. King also appeals to pathos, describing the plight of the colored man vividly. King’s audience is largely aware of this situation already, but he uses it to drive them to action rather than simple awareness. On the other hand, Thoreau appeals little to pathos, focusing instead on logic and ethics.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the spring 1963, Martin Luther King was jailed due to his non-violent demonstrations against racial segregation at Birmingham. Eight of Alabama’s top white religious leaders criticized his action as “unwise and untimely,” and called him an “outsider.” Martin Luther King responded with his own article, “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” He explained his reasons in Birmingham, and necessities of taking nonviolent direct action in Birmingham. He also persuaded the audiences to get involved with the African-American civil rights movement. Throughout this letter, there are many smart and clever uses of logical appeals (King).…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, King's emotional appeal is what above all contrasts his essay with Thoreau's. As virtually everything else; the theme of disobeying "unjust laws", their admiration for the "minority's viewpoint, and even, coincidently, where they wrote their essays - prison, is all the same. King makes two references to conversations shared with his children. Once with his little girl who wants to go to the public amusement park and is quickly developing "tears in her eyes" as her father has to sadly explain the reality that black children aren't…

    • 969 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King begins his letter by responding to his critics that his non-observance of laws is based on the fact of whether they are just or not, by appealing to logos. When King states, “One may well ask: ‘How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?’ as well as: ‘I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. Conversely one has the moral obligation to disobey unjust laws.” he constructs a concession/counterargument. This helps appeal to logos by first acknowledging that there are a some, white clergymen, who may disagree with his stance, but by painting segregation as “unjust”, he is able to counter these clergymen’s opinions, and prove that segregation needs to be abolished. Also, when King explains in a syllogism that laws that degrade the human personality are unjust, and segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality, therefore segregation is unjust. By illustrating deductive reasoning, King logically proves his assertion by giving the general example for what is “unjust” and portraying segregation as such, which can lead to no other conclusion than to abolish segregation. Finally, King appeals to logos through a reliance on authority. By using the clergymen’s beliefs against them, he mentions how both St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine both agree that “an unjust law is no law at all” and a human law “that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law.”…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau and Dr. King lived during two different centuries. So being that they were vocalist and activist on the current issues it's almost certain that they would have a different motive. Even though their motive was 'poles apart', differing in many ways, both Thoreau and Dr. King wrote with the aspiration of obtaining a new form of government presumably resembling the republican one we exercise today. Although awfully controversial, to do so both men felt nonverbal actions such as breaking the laws was the only effective way. In spite of the fact that it's relatively ironic, they viewed going to jail in order to make a mockery of an immoral or impractical laws put in place by the government was "the very highest respect for law (King para. 5)."Henry David Thoreau motive for rebelling against the government was to make it more of a democratic one. He had no respect for the way it was being ran. His proclaimed problem basically summed up to be that he felt the government was being ran like a monarchy, or in other words by a selective few and not an entire society as it should. It simply wasn't up to par according to his standards; for he stated this "I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government (para. 4)."Unlike Henry David Thoreau, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was an African American during the times of segregation.…

    • 506 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written over 114 years after Henry David Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience”, Martin Luther King wrote his most famous essay; “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” In the times of Henry David Thoreau there was only one topic of politics in the United States, slavery. Many southerners wanted to keep slavery while many northerners were against it. Henry David Thoreau was a white northerner that was against slavery, and he was willing to go to jail for it. He proved that in writing his famous letter. In the letter Thoreau describes what it means to be civilly disobedient. In Thoreau’s terms, Civil Disobedience is standing up peacefully against laws you do not think are moral. He was civilly disobedient in not paying poll taxes for over six years because he knew the money was used to support slavery. Martin Luther King was a great civil rights leader that lived in the period of the Civil Rights Movement. King went to jail for a peaceful march against racial hatred after he was specifically told not to march. He was put in a jail in Birmingham for eight days; this is when he wrote his famous letter in response to a letter from eight Alabama clergymen. He was arguing against racial hatred and used the effects of ethos, pathos, and logos to attain his argument. Although Thoreau is formal with his writing and uses plenty of logical reasoning to attain his point, King is more like likely t move the readers due to his ability to reach your emotional side, and his credibility as a leader of the Civil Rights Movement.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King there are two types of laws, you have just laws and unjust laws. “Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust” (pg.3). Dr. King distinguishes between the two very clearly in his letter. He goes on to talk about each law, just and unjust, and gives thorough examples of each. He is of course talking about how discrimination and segregation is unjust. “For instance, I was arrested Friday on a charge of parading without a permit. Now there is nothing wrong with an ordinance which requires a permit for a parade, but when the ordinance is used to preserve segregation and to deny citizens the First amendment privilege of peaceful assembly and peaceful protest, then it becomes unjust” (pg.3). This is a great example because Martin accepts the fact that he was arrested for “parading” without a permit. But this is unjust because the ordinance was used to preserve segregation. I found this ironic that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was getting this ticket when in fact the officer whom was writing the ticket should be thrown in jail for violating the first amendment. In my opinion, I agree with this letter in its entirety. I too believe that everyone has certain natural rights. In my opinion ‘moral law’ does exist. His examples of just and unjust laws are shared by many, and if not, they are at least shared by…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two different writers, Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, argue that society is not at its finest and that every man has the responsibility to impact change and every many has the power to do so, only if man is an extremist for the greater good. King was a reverend but more importantly he was a dominant voice for thousands of persecuted people during the civil rights movement. From King expressing his knowledge and acting on them, he was obliged and jailed (he was obliged to jail?) within King's cell he composed a letter entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. (transition?) Thoreau was a philosopher who contained all the qualities of a transcendentalist. Much time before King’s letter, Thoreau fabricated a response to when…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience as a whole acts as a means of positive change in a free society. The First Amendment of the Constitution stands as a protectant to our freedom of speech and expression. In over words, civil disobedience exists as a product of our rights as an American citizen. Without this peaceful resistance to unjust laws, we would be tied down to regulations that serve to endanger and infringe upon the freedom our founding fathers fought for. Though out history, civil heros such as Henry David Thoreau, Rosa Parks, and Martin Luther King Jr serve to reflect the positive impact and enhanced freedom brought to life by civil disobedience.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The protests led by legendary activist Martin Luther King and the watershed event of Rosa Park’s infamous bus ride were just two instances in which civil disobedience came to fruition in modern day America. The following quote by Thoreau laid the groundwork for the basis of the actions of many civil rights activists, King and Parks included, “I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward...The only obligation which I have is the right to do what I think right.” (Civil Disobedience 475). The aforementioned quote reveals Thoreau’s belief that it was a citizen’s obligation to withdraw from participating in an unjust and evil government and gives support to future opposition to the American Government as scene during the 1950s and 1960s. Thoreau argues on several issues throughout his essay which include disassociation and reform, however one overarching and undeniable argument that is present throughout his essay is that the American government is an unjust government that must be corrected. This belief was also held by civil rights activists. Through this research paper, the…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Government and Higher Law. In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau's basic premise is that a higher law than civil law demands the obedience of the individual. Human law and government are subordinate. In cases where the two are at odds with one another, the individual must follow his conscience and, if necessary, disregard human law.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience, he says, “ The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right.” Both Socrates and Thoreau seem to agree with the principle that humans are obligated to do what they believe…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the readings Civil Disobedience and the Letter From Birmingham Jail, by Henry David Thoreau and Dr. Martin Luther King, they both focus on the matter of civil disobedience and the right of which every individual person should know that is it morally right to disobey laws that are unjust, and should be willing to face the aftermath of consequences. They both argue that the society that we live in would be a better place and of one unity if the citizens would know the difference between the concept of just and unjust laws.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King, however, didn’t advocate citizens transcending the law, but rather, Dr. King believed that in order to remedy injustice in society, people must openly break the unjust law and accept punishment in showing “highest respect for the law”(King p.23). In a rather interesting yet extreme example, King relates civil disobedience to the Holocaust: “It was ‘illegal’ to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany. But I am sure that, if I had lived in Germany during that time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal. If I lived in a communist country today where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I believe I would openly advocate disobeying these anti-religious laws”(King p.23). King cites such an example to bring out the visceral reaction of the audience, given the Holocaust’s widespread negative publicity and condemnation. Thus, King manipulates the reader’s emotions to bring them on board with the idea of civil disobedience. No one would dare question the rectitude of aiding a helpless Jew. King attempts direct the same negative connotation of the Holocaust to segregation in the U.S. to fight injustice in…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays