Comparing Fayol and Mintzberg

Good Essays
Topics: Management
Henri Fayol - Administration
Description
With two exceptions, Henri Fayol’s theories of administration dovetail nicely into the bureaucratic superstructure described by Weber. Henri Fayol focuses on the personal duties of management at a much more granular level than Weber did. While Weber laid out principles for an ideal bureaucratic organization Fayol’s work is more directed at the management layer.
Fayol believed that management had five principle roles: to forecast and plan, to organize, to command, to co-ordinate and to control. Forecasting and planning was the act of anticipating the future and acting accordingly. Organization was the development of the institution's resources, both material and human. Commanding was keeping the institution’s actions and processes running. Co-ordination was the alignment and harmonization of the groups’ efforts. Finally, control meant that the above activities were performed in accordance with appropriate rules and procedures.
Fayol developed fourteen principles of administration to go along with management’s five primary roles. These principles are enumerated below: • Specialization/division of labor • Authority with responsibility • Discipline • Unity of command • Unity of direction • Subordination of individual interest to the general interest • Remuneration of staff • Centralization • Scalar chain/line of authority • Order • Equity • Stability of tenure • Initiative • Esprit de corps The final two principles, initiative and esprit de corps, show a difference between Fayol’s concept of an ideal organization and Weber’s. Weber predicted a completely impersonal organization with little human level interaction between its members. Fayol clearly believed personal effort and team dynamics were part of a "ideal" organization.
Environment
Fayol was a successful mining engineer and senior executive prior to publishing his principles of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    most prominent theorists who have attempted to define management are Henri Fayol and Henry Mintzberg, both of which have similar and contrasting views of management. When discussing these two theories, one of the most commonly asked questions is: “Is the work of managers’ best described by the objectives of management or the roles one undertakes as a manager?” This is a question posed since 1971, when Henry Mintzberg established his contemporary theory on Management roles, which evidently differed…

    • 2558 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fayol and Mintzberg

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fayol and Mintzberg The aim of this project is to highlight what management is all about. Management is a vague term which many theorists have different interpretation. It has become an important part of our society and also in our daily activities. Based on my research, management is the process of getting activities completed efficiently and effectively with and through people. In this essay, I will be comparing and contrasting the views of management with two profound theorists, Fayol and Mintzberg…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Fayol and Mintzberg

    • 2179 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Introduction Since Fayol left his general manager office, separated management from business operation and studied it, management has become an independent subject. A number of academics and entrepreneurs are desirous to find what management is and how to be a successful manager. Therefore, through varied approaches, many different views about management has been appearing such as Fayol’s function theory (1949) which based on his owe managing experience and Mintzberg’s 10 roles theory (1973) which…

    • 2179 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Fayol and Mintzberg

    • 1915 Words
    • 6 Pages

    industrialist, Henry Fayol, the classic management portrays 4 functions known as POLC: Planning, Organizing, Leading, and Controlling. However, in the late 1960’s, Henry Mintzberg undertook a careful study of 5 executives to determine what these managers did on their jobs. In Mintzberg’s framework, a manager consists of 3 roles: informational roles, interpersonal roles, and decisional roles. Throughout this essay, the structure will be first about discussion of Fayol and Mintzberg theories in management…

    • 1915 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fayol vs. Mintzberg

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Introduction Henri Fayol (born 1841) who is a classical management theorist, and published (in 1916) his ideas of a management style that seems to categorise labour as capital, and sets out distinct titles of activities and roles that a manager should follow. Fayol’s theory has, supposedly, been heavily opposed by Henry Mintzberg’s (born 1939) differing views on management, portraying managers as critical strategic players (Brooks, 2009) and investigating what people are motivated by other than…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Henry Amm Fayol or Mintzberg – Who is right? Date: 11/12/2011 Student Number: 110369257 Version 1.0 The task: Henri Fayol presented his analysis of the management function in 1916 and it has largely been superseded by the more descriptive approaches of what managers actually do, such that favored by Henry Mintzberg. However, it could be argued that the image portrayed by Fayol is superior to that of Mintzberg, and the latter’s description is of rather ineffective management! Who do you…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    question? There were many attempts to answer it. The response of Henri Fayol was unique. With his work General and Industrial Management (1949, in France 1916) he is hailed as as the earliest pioneer and advocate of the task of management (Parker and Ritson, 2005). However, as each theory, this one has its opponents as well. Perhaps the best known critic of the classical functions for describing managerial work is Henry Mintzberg, who negated Fayol’s evidence and presented in The Nature of Managerial…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol vs. Henry Mintzberg. Functions vs. roles Henri Fayol and Henry Mintzberg are “two sides of the one coin”. Each man has his own opinion on what the manager does. Fayol has his “five functions” and Mintzberg has his “roles of management”. In this essay I will discuss both men’s opinions and try to come to a conclusion on which I think is better. Henri Fayol, a French management theorist and managing director of a French mining company, came up with the five functions…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henri Fayol or Henry Mintzberg; Management, management today is one of the subjects with the most widely branched areas. Management is an area under discussion and criticised since many years before till today by many contributors and authors. There have been developed many ideas and notions regarding the right way to manage and been successful manager. Some of the most important contributors are Henri Fayol and Henry Mintzberg with two different views but, in the same time very similar…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    work of managers? This is a question posed since 1971, when Henry Mintzberg established his contemporary theory on Management roles, which evidently differed to Henri Fayol’s 1949 classical theory on Management Functions. Fayol identifies five elements of management- planning, organising, co-ordinating, commanding and controlling all of which he believed were necessary to facilitate the management process. In comparison Mintzberg considers management activities to fall within three broad groups-…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays