Preview

Comparing Descartes God And The Christian God

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1572 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Descartes God And The Christian God
DESCARTES’ GOD Do we need a watchmaker god or the Christian God and how is it related to living a good life? The subject of god has always fascinated me, and I love to read how others interpret their personal gods. It is also interesting to see how people prioritize their gods in their life and what importance they give their gods. I believe that the Christian God is the true God and exactly what we need to live a good life. We need to have a goal and an end, which is eternal happiness with God. Descartes’ god is the watchmaker god that simply winds up the clock of time and walks away, letting all things happen on their own, according to the natural laws that god put into place. The first problem with this is with Descartes’ lack of …show more content…
This is not proof because there are no public recordings, witness reports, documents or fulfilled prophecies that lead us to believe that his theory is true. This is simply a made-up idea that Descartes invented in his imagination and provides no actual proofs. Compare this theory of Descartes with the Christian God, we have Roman documents that describes an agitator named Jesus Christ that was put to death by crucifixion. This crucial documentation along with thousands of witnesses that have firsthand knowledge of the miracles Jesus performed, written documents of his apostles and disciples, and prophecies from the Old Testament that were fulfilled by Jesus. This is the difference between an idea that is fabricated in one’s own mind and a well-documented faith tradition, like Christianity.
The next issue is that even know that Descartes’ god is perfect, Descartes places
…show more content…
Christianity believes that, mankind has free will and can make decisions that can have good and evil consequences. Without free will we are simply puppets, with the law being the puppet master, thus, the meaning of life is lost. If we are simply puppet that have no control over our environment, how exactly does one manipulate the laws of nature? Descartes does not address this apparent contradiction in his book. Another aspect of free will is that humans choose where their immortal spirit will reside for eternity, we either go to heaven or hell. Descartes does not discuss this except in a couple of areas and he says that the soul and body are separate and the reasonable soul is assigned to a body after the soul is created (5, 4). This is problematic because the body and soul are two distinct things, according to Descartes, and can exist fully, apart from each other. He goes further by saying that the person does not need a body to exist, but just the soul, which is the thinking and reasoning part of the person (4, 2). This brings up the question of the eternal disposition of soul and body, what happens to it? When does it end? Again, there is no discussion for this essential question. Descartes does say with science, we will resolve the issue of death, we

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The objection is one that discusses how God may not even exist and that his essence is different from his existence. Descartes used the metaphor of a valley and mountain and how they are connected by having ascending and descending slope. Valleys lead into mountains and then back to valleys. Even though this valley and the mountain show the connection, there is not any proof of this valley existing. Descartes counters this objection by saying that we can very easily imagine a horse with or without wings or a mountain without a valley, but we cannot imagine God without him existing. The other objection that someone would make about Descartes logic and reasoning would be that God’s existence would never come into play if we never thought about his existence in the first place. Descartes replies by saying that by thinking of beings greater than ourselves ultimately leads us to thinking of God. In other words, God is legitimate whether we think about his existence or not. We ultimately are compelled to end up at this idea.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapters 6 And 7 Module 2

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes believed what he perceived clearly and distinctly is that God would be the cause for his hand…

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that Descartes is even considering the mere question of his own existence just proves that he indeed exists and that is certain. Further, he argues that we are essentially thinking things (res cogitans) that can know our minds clearly and distinctly. Descartes pitches a tent for himself firmly in the rationalist camp, as opposed to the empiricist camp. He constantly emphasizes that the clear and distinct perceptions of the intellect are the only sure means of securing knowledge, and ultimately concludes that the senses are not designed to give us knowledge at all, but are rather meant to help us move through the world in a very practical…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This gives an insight into why Descartes relies so heavily on the God in his meditations. It seems he uses God to support his meditations and uses God as a solution to his philosophy of doubt. God is vital as he is the answer to Descartes’ most complex ideas on doubt and enables him to preach God’s ability to relieve us of doubt but further more he want to reveal to us that God is the reason for all matter , for our…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes casts everything into doubt in the first meditation, including God Himself. He then comes to this disproval of this theory therefore concluding that God exists. This is brought about through the causal argument.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In all teachings whether it be from the Greeks, Romans, or Christians we have some sort of divine being ruling over men. With the exception of some Greek philosophers who, believed in no god or gods. One of the major differences between ancient religion and the Christian religion is the ancients, believed in many gods ruling over them while Christianity is monotheistic. Also just before the revolution of Christianity there were many skeptics of the old, polytheistic religions. It was evident that people were confused to why the gods would have human vices and prejudices. Christianity resolved this by God being perfect and omniscient.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Paper

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes establishes that in order to know what in fact exists, one must first take everything off the table and then see what can be put back. The conclusion is that in order to be certain that one is a thinking thing; one must know what it takes to be certain. “All those things I perceive very clearly and very distinctly are true”(Pg. 53). This general rule however, requires that all doubt must be removed. This can only be done if God both exists and is not a deceiver. Descartes then breaks substances down into those that have objective reality and those with formal reality. It is clear that the idea of God must have more objective reality than formal reality. However, the idea itself is so great that Descartes believes that he could not have come up with it by himself. Since he himself is a finite substance, it is assumed that something infinite would be the only thing that could envision the idea of the infinite in the first place. Therefore, God must exist and cannot be a deceiver because he would not allow Descartes to not be able to clearly and distinctly perceive. This argument then rests on Descartes proof of the existence of God, which can only be erroneous if Descartes clarity and distinctness rule is incorrect. Since the argument of God is used for the validation of the clarity and distinctness rule, and the rule itself implicitly must prove that God exists, the Cartesian circle is created. For an argument to be circular, one of the premises must be reliant upon the conclusion for its truth. If you touch on one argument, you touch on both. There are a few ways out of the circle.…

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Firstly, Descartes in the third meditation sets out to prove that God does indeed exist. To begin with, he considered that the source of an idea must be as real as the idea itself. He thought that since his idea of God had overwhelmingly unlimited content, then the one who caused the idea must be infinite and that it must be god, and thus asserted that what is more perfect cannot arise from what is imperfect. In his conclusion, Descartes says that God is a substance that is omnipotent, omniscient, independent and infinite. He argued that if the objective reality of an idea could not come from him, then it could have come from something else. The basis for the arguments he put forward lies in the…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basis of Descartes proof that God exists is in the nature of ideas. What is the nature of ideas? To explain what they are, Descartes splits ideas into two categories. The first group of ideas is like the images of things, for example, a man, or an angel. These ideas are basic, and are not truth apt. What that means is that they are neither true nor false. For example, if I am having an idea of an angel, it doesn’t seem sensible to ask, “is that idea you are having of an angel true or false?”, because it can never be less true that I am in fact imagining the angel. The main point is that these ideas do not have a truth value. However, other ideas are capable of being true or false. For these ideas, they are connected to the outside World in a way that involves a claim. For example, if I claimed, “this ball is red”, this claim could be true or false because the ball could in fact be red, or I could be mistaken! This second group of ideas is known as judgments, and judgments are truth apt. Descartes says that to remove this possibility for falsity in judgments, ideas should be taken simply as modes of…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cartesian Circle

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As is usually the case when someone makes a bold and illogical statement, many have challenged Descartes’ logic. Many have claimed that his argument follows a “vicious circle,” as both premises rely on each other’s truth and validity. His argument is basically dependent on certainty of God’s existence, despite an equal amount of uncertainty regarding that existence. Descartes states that no one is definite about the existence of God, nor can they know anything clearly and distinctly until they are certain about the existence of God. Assuming that these premises are accurate, we as humans know nothing because we cannot say with certainty that God exists.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Descartes decided to tear down his beliefs and start fresh, he needed a foundation upon which to build his ideology. When judging what reality is, God must be considered. He/she must be taken out of a religious concept and proven to exist, exist in a way in which we cannot be deceived into only thinking is real. The proof of the existence of God in this way forms the backbone of Descartes’ further forays into proving what is reality.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes’ first meditation, his main objective is to present three skeptical arguments to bring doubt upon what he considers his basic beliefs. Descartes believes this to be an intricate part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes skeptical arguments are not intended to be a denial of his basic beliefs. On the contrary, he uses these arguments to help prove one of his main theses, which is the existence of God. One of the main premises that Descartes uses in his proof for the existence of God comes from the evil demon argument, which he proposed, in the first meditation. It is this evil demon argument, which will be the topic of the following discussion.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    God is the next doubt that Descartes brings to attention. He says that he is constantly deceived and God must have created him to be subject to this occasional deception. This doubt is quickly dispersed however when Descartes reasons that God is good and therefore would not deceive him because that would be contrary to his goodness.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes' Meditations

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    8. Given the existence of a good God, how does Descartes justify his beliefs based on reason and on the…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "I think, therefore I am"

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes felt that that the power of thinking or sensing has nothing to do with the physical body. If he could cease all thinking than he could cease to exist. A thing that thinks is "a thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, and that also imagines and senses"(Descartes 20). There is a clear separation between the mind and the body. If the body exists, it does not mean the "I" exist. The mind is something that is thinking, indivisible, and non-extended while the body is something that is non-thinking, divisible and extended. He believes in the standard of perfection, which must be separate from his mind because of the imperfection in his thinking.…

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays