In the play, "The Crucible", by Arthur Miller, there are three main authority figures. Unlike what the Bible teaches on this subject, Reverend Samuel Parris, Reverend John Hale, and Deputy Governor Danforth show their understanding of authority in alternate ways. In the Bible, Peter says, ". . . I may not have to be harsh in my use of authority--the authority the Lord gave me for building you up, not for tearing you down" (2 Cor. 13:10). In "The Crucible", the Biblical view of authority is contrasted with those of these three men. Though the Biblical view of authority is servant-like, these three men fall far short of such standards.
Parris believes that the church is the main authority over the people in Salem, and that he is the appointed leader, having power over them. Parris demands that the town obey his command as a representative of the church. In the Bible, the book of Romans tells people to "submit to authorities" (Rom 13:5). Parris constantly feels his authority is being threatened when people question his power-hungry and self-serving ways; he feels persecuted wherever he goes.
Hale is convinced that the written word is the main authority in society. He comments that knowledge is "weighted with authority" (36), so there should be no question as to the reliability and righteousness of the written word. He assumes that the court knows what is best. He believes that people should be confident, trusting that the court makes the right decisions.
Danforth is very strict and resolute about his authority in the court and claims that the court is the highest form of authority. Danforth also has a strong belief that, "anyone rebelling against authority is rebelling against what God has instituted" (Rom. 13:2). Danforth says, "while I speak God 's law, I will not crack its voice with whimpering" (129). In other words, he will not weaken when speaking God 's will.
The Bible explains that authority is supposed to lift people up and not bring them down. The Bible also clarifies that he who does not obey authority will be punished. Parris 's authority is weak in that he is insecure and hides behind the mask of authority of his position. Hale 's authority is arrogant, for he believes he knows more because of all the knowledge of the occult that he has gained. Danforth 's is incontrovertible, for he believes adamantly that God is just and He will reveal to the court what is right. All three men have strong convictions of what authority should be like, but unfortunately, they choose altered Biblical views.
Works Cited:
Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. New York: Penguin Books, 1981.
The Student Bible. 3rd ed. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996.
Cited: Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. New York: Penguin Books, 1981. The Student Bible. 3rd ed. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Human nature has often proven to be ignorant and exhibit prejudice to the individuals who provide nothing but benefit for society. John Proctor, a character in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, can be classified as one of these people. As the proverbial Christ figure, Proctor embodies a being that exhibits a multitude of characteristics including the confrontation of the evil in society, temptation towards evil, and conjointly, often being persecuted and made to suffer by his community. John Proctor indubitably is a paragon of such a being as is illustrated in Miller’s play.…
- 557 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout the history of humanity, there are many examples of horrible and completely hideous crimes. While many of the crimes committed were pushed by the desire for power of some persons (mostly men: Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot, Josef Stalin and Idi Amin Dada are good examples), others were realized in the name of God, as the ones who planned them say (all the wars among different religions and, more recently, Osama Bin Laden). It is well known that the "big names" of these crimes had a very strong ability to manipulate people. I think that one of the things they were very good at is that they could manipulate many thousands of people to make them accept to be complitely submitted and believe that what they were about to commit was not a crime but something that had to be done. In this essay, we will discuss two crimes that are very similar in the way that the governements in control were very good at directing the population into the ideas they wanted them to believe in, and in having them act the way they wanted them to. The first situation is the witch trials of Salem that took place in the 1690s (as reported by Arthur Miller in The Crucible), and the second is the massive anti-communism movement that took place in the United-States between 1947 and 1954. By looking at the facts found in the play, and by looking at the history of the anti-communism movement , we will make the parrallels between these two major crimes against freedom of expression.…
- 2412 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Author Miller in his play The Crucible explores the lives of people who strictly live under the church’s authority in a theocratic society during the 1690s in Salem, Massachusetts. A community of Puritans with their strong beliefs will cause a paranoia in their entire village. The ministers of the church afraid of losing their power will do anything to keep it. Other individuals seek power for their own personal vendetta. With the use of direct characterization, allusion, and irony Miller shows his readers who has the power, who fears it, and who wants in The Crucible.…
- 678 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In The Crucible, reputation is an important aspect to each character because it shows one's ability to follow their religion. Reverend Parris, Judge Danforth, and John Proctor demonstrate the nature of Puritan Idealism and how it affects the decisions they make about their religion, family and self.…
- 168 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
During the time of the Salem Witch Trials in 1692, there were people with manipulative and equivocal personalities who drastically altered the aspects of Massachusetts. Consequently, chaos caused an intractable problem in the government of Salem, and its principles ruined. Thus, in Miller’s The Crucible, Miller shows, through fictional characters, how and who the Salem Witch Trials affected and how or by whom it was caused. Taking advantage of the mass hysteria in Salem, Abigail Williams and Reverend John Hale heavily influenced the Salem Witch Trials; Abigail started the witchcraft rumors and was responsible for the hangings of several people and Reverend Hale, who thought of himself as a knowledgeable person of witchcraft, and towards the end was devastated with the revelation that he had in fact, part-taken in the “Devil’s work.”…
- 1044 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Everyone and everything on earth is unique, from the first person born to the last, there will never be two of the same people with the exact same features and characteristics. This is the fundamental basis of a hero and a villain, and even a foil and the main character. All of these relations can be seen as a partnership in which two opposite parties are completely opposite each other hence the term unique. For example, many movies might present different viewpoints from numerous numbers of characters. One example to a foil and main character is the relationship between The Mandarin and Iron Man. They both have vast amounts of knowledge on futuristic technology but very different uses. The false intentions of The Mandarin bring out and further enhance the good unselfish intentions of Iron Man. Most films and novels contain two major views, the foil and the main character. These views are often very contradicting. Arthur Miller does a phenomenal job by indirectly showing the foil and the main character in The Crucible.…
- 1390 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
As Reverend John Hale is not a resident of Salem, he approaches the accusations and rumors without any prior opinion. Hale is introduced as extremely arrogant and proud with his goal being “light, goodness and its preservation”(Miller 34). This phrasing strengthens his role as a man of God, but this is not actually displayed in his personality until later. He is very book smart and this leads to some signs of immaturity. This is shown in Act I when Parris questions why the devil would come to Salem. “Why would he [the devil] choose this house to strike?”(39) In response Hale says, “It is the best the Devil wants, and who is better than the minister?”(39) This shows he enjoys the position better than he does its purpose. He is…
- 1422 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
It’s easier to commit sinful actions and blame someone else than to stand up and risk ones reputation to be a hero. Reverend Parris shows lack of integrity throughout the play as he is fearful to lose his reputation as a spiritual leader. As the court is in debate Parris says “Excellency, you surely cannot think to let so vile a lie to be spread in open court” (Miller 89). Here, Parris’ evil action is shown because he knows that there is no witchcraft but he is too fearful of losing his reputation by admitting that the girls are lying. His lack of integrity is shown as he is not being honest in the court. Furthermore, reverend Parris becomes more pathetic towards the end of the play as he continues to lack integrity and does not tell the truth even though he almost got killed by a dagger at his door step. While talking to Danforth, Parris explains…
- 803 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play the crucible, Arthur miller uses the character of John Proctor who, residing in hysteria-shaken Puritan Salem, rises beyond the hysteria and proves himself a true hero through his heroic virtues, challenging of authority and power, self-sacrifice and self-realisation. Proctor is the only individual willing to question the puritan belief system. He believes that no man should have control over the life of another. Only God has the power to judge and condemn. Therefore, choosing the more tragic outcome by not allowing himself to lose his individuality and sense of self-conflict of ethics between what is right from wrong as well as sheer lack of common sense. He also sacrifices his life and reputation for what he believes is right, his integrity and his wife.…
- 884 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, Reverend Parris is a character in the play that is very static. His character does not evolve in many ways during the course of the play. By the end of the play, Reverend Parris is still selfish, stubborn, and greedy. However, one of his most prominent flaws at the begging of the play is his selfishness.…
- 1120 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Entering these trials, Reverend Hale feels as though he is an expert on witchcraft. He is specifically called upon by Reverend Parris to diagnose his daughter and determine whether witchcraft is the cause of her illness (Act I Pg. 33-35). Although ambivalent about the nature of the child’s illness, Hale has a slight feeling of doubt that witchcraft has occurred. He understands that the townspeople are trying to lead him with false pretenses and mass hysteria toward the conclusion that witchcraft has occurred. He begins to see a weakness in the townspeople of Salem and tries not to let hearsay accusations be the support for his verdict.…
- 994 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In “The Crucible,” it is clearly illustrated that religion is the foundation in which the society of Salem is built upon. This directly implies that morality is highly valued in the society. In the beginning of the play, Arthur Miller draws a distinct line between John Proctor and Parris from their backgrounds and moral standards. Proctor is a married farmer who had an affair with a 17-year old house worker, Abigail. Parris is a minister of the church, and his reputation plays a very important role in maintaining his position as the leader of the congregation. While Miller portrays Proctor as an immoral man, he portrays Parris as a somewhat respected man in the city of Salem. But their moral standards eventually swoop through the witch trial that strikes the town. Throughout the story, Parris serves as a foil for Proctor by giving up his integrity for his reputation while Proctor gives up his life for goodness.…
- 688 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Reverend Hale is one of the three individuals most responsible for the witch hunts in Salem, the only one who was not a direct cause for their beginning. Even so, he entered the proceedings with the most official power and the most ability to prevent their escalation and did not do so. Instead, he naively believes that the courts will be just and logical, and that the people of Salem are telling him the truth. He is well aware of his authority over the townspeople as a man of God, which he makes plain when he says, “No, no. Now let me instruct you. We cannot look to superstition in this. The devil is precise; the marks of his presence are as definite as stone, and I must tell you all that I shall not proceed unless you are prepared to believe me if I should find no bruise of hell upon her” (154). But even as he conducts his initial investigations into Betty’s supposed possession,…
- 1141 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Rice, Arnold, and John A. Krout. United States History from 1865. New York: HarperCollins College Outline, 1991.…
- 639 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
People have different perspectives of the importance of life. Some believe there are some things worth dying for in life such as faith, legacy, friends, and family. Some believe that life is too precious to sacrifice. John Proctor believed that his life was worth sacrificing and he chose to die in The Crucible. Though the character of Proctor is often praised for his integrity, is he helping his family by dying? His wife, sons, and unborn child will have to make it in the world without him. This is not an instance that would ultimately be worth dying for. What has John accomplished by dying? It seems as if the Salem witch trials have gotten the better of him and he has given up. Although he may have forgiven himself and been forgiven by his wife, there was not enough at stake for John to sacrifice his life. John even says, “I want my life” (Miller 127). There are some things that are worth dying for, however, in John Proctor’s case, life was not worth sacrificing.…
- 838 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays