Preview

Comparing Aristotle's Four Types Of Democracy And Oligarchy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
994 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Aristotle's Four Types Of Democracy And Oligarchy
In Book IV, Aristotle identifies the need to study the ideal state, but the bad state as well, because sometimes the statesman has to work with what he has. Aristotle focuses on the oligarchy and the democracy and differences in the rich and poor. Of the four types of democracy the worst is the extreme from, where all offices are open to anyone, and people are the law. Of the four types of oligarchies, the worst is where offices are inherited, and the magistrates have no checks or balances. Of aristocracy there is only one form, where only the good men are citizens; they are chosen for their wealth and merit. Some aristocracies are actually just polities, or compromises between democracy and oligarchy. A good constitution is a mean between …show more content…
Revolution is found in any state founded on false ideas of justice; democracy is more stable than oligarchies against revolution. Some common causes include dissent over the favoring of a particular class and a lack of middle-class which causes feuds between rich and poor. In democracies, revolution can be caused when the rich are persecuted or when politicians compete to gain the favor of the populace. In oligarchies, revolution is caused by the common people rebelling against oppression. Oligarchies are usually destroyed from within, when a new oligarchy is created within the original. In aristocracies, revolution is caused by the rising against the unfair ruler(s), which can lead to the forming of an oligarchy. The ways to avoid a revolution include avoidance of class oppression, not allowing any particular individual or group become too powerful, and others. The causes which destroy and preserve monarchy are tyranny and kingship, respectively. Tyranny is a combination of the vices in democracy and oligarchy, while kingship is similar to aristocracy. Moderation is the best way to preserve kingship, while tyranny is maintained by imitation of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Several Greek city-states had the government form of an oligarchy, where the small group of people wield the ruling power. They were considered the highest class as political power was shared amongst the group (Carr). The groups were formed based off of aristocratic birth or wealth (Carr). Unlike this class, the lower class citizens in the oligarchy did not share the same rights as they lacked full political rights and were not eligible to rule (Carr). They are thus excluded from voting or having any type of say for any political decision for the city-state Furthermore, the right to vote or to be eligible for power was based off of wealth in this government form. In contrast to this government for his city-state lived under, Aristotle explores…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy has been around for hundreds of years and while the basic principles have stayed the same though each society governed in a slightly different way. The most influential democracies were Greece, as it was considered one of the first democracies, and the Roman Republic which lasted several hundred years. Because each sovereignty ruled differently, they had different advancements in the areas of democracy especially in the people's role in the government, the method of voting and fairness of law.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meaning that they took different ideas from an oligarchy and a democracy type of of government and combined the two together and make their own version of a government which they called democracy, isn't fully true they believed what they had was a democracy and in many ways it was. try to say they didn't really give the power to the people so it wasn't really a democracy, rather it was more of an oligarchy. The men acted as the governing group. Professor Hanson states, “...by our standards it was oligarchy not democracy. Second, rule was exercised directly by the people,…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first, the rulers or the statue who was in absolute power, refused to sign or agree to the constitution. This lead to more riots and conflicts. Some revolutions, such as the Mexican revolution, created bloody wars and fights in order to gain the approval of their constitution. In other cases, such as the Brazilian Revolution, they cause no destruction on people’s lives and they did not carry out bloody wars- they decided to solve problems “peacefully.” After revolting a little more, the head of the conservatives decides to sign and be part of the contract, which leads towards the end of the revolution and this is the stage in which the radicals’ desires are fulfilled. In yet another example, the Mexican Revolution created the Inquala plan: which contained the three conditions: “One, Mexico would become an independent monarchy governed by transplanted king Ferdinand. Two, Creolles and Pennensulars would have equal human rights and civil liberties. Three, the Roman Catholic Churches could keep their privileges.” More precisely, the Brazilian Revolution created a petition that eight-thousand Brazilians signed, that asked King John to let his son, Dom Pedro, to rule this country. Eventually, Pedro gave the independence to the Brazilian, and he led the constitutional monarchy in…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, people have been oppressed and ruled by unfair governments. Rebellions, sparked by Enlightenment thinkers and philosophers, have caused changes in governments around the world. Several of which include the American Revolution, French Revolution, and the Latin American Revolution. However, only the American Revolution truly established a working form of government that lasted centuries.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also deteriorating was the system of feudalism. Although vassals owned lands distributed to them by lords in exchange for service, one can see that the true power of rule lies with the people. When the people are unsatisfied with the way things are run, they are able to voice their opinions through revolution.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After this, Socrates goes on to show that there are four types of regimes, listed in the order of most just to least just: aristocracy, timocracy, oligarchy, democracy and tyranny. Then he goes on to say how each develops from the other, and why each is just and/or unjust. Similarly, the men from each era represent the amount of justice in their souls. This in turn proves that the just man is happier than the unjust man.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A revolution is a change where something past becomes modified or completely outlawed for a better future. An incalculable number of revolutions happen every minute of every day, some on a global wide scale, but most minor and insignificant. However, not everyone advocates these changes, Although the American, Haitian, and French Revolutions were revolts driven by the lack of social and political equality that their native government provided them, revolutionary leaders also underwent a social struggle to transition from the past to the future, in which they abandoned military protection, had to reconstruct society, accepting an independent and vulnerable position in the world. The American, French, and Haitian Revolutions all were revolts…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “From the very first day members of an oligarchy have no truck with mere equality, and they all think they deserve unquestioned first place: whereas in a democracy the result of an election is easier to bear when the loser can console himself with the thought that he was not competing with his equals.1” The political views of Thucydides are not blatantly expressed to the reader, and are quite difficult to fully understand what his views are. But as explained by his quote, the differences of the oligarchy and the democracy are evident, and democracy is explained with more of a light on it, explaining it as the better option. Thucydides does an excellent job in explaining what is going on at the time, but his own opinions of political…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle truly believed that politics was a science that could be understood in the same way as anatomy or physics. Because of that he wrote this book to help people create a better more stable state. He starts by explaining the way in which a household is like a small state and clarifying the rules that must be put into place in regards to women, children and slaves all of which he seen as less than people with purpose. After dealing with this he begins his description of the different types of states, which he divides into six main primary forms. The first three that he would describe as proper states are monarchy, aristocracy and constitutional government. After that he describes the three corrupted forms as tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy. Monarchy is when one person who is the best in the state rules under the law for the sake of his citizens. This government though is often corrupted into tyranny where one person through strength holds his equals or betters below himself for his own benefit. Aristocracy is when the people who are above average join together to wisely run the state so that it might prosper. Often though it degrades into oligarchy where the power is all in the hands of a few who use the power to try maintain their position. Constitutional government is when people willingly submit to wise laws, which are put together to help the state. Democracy is its corrupted form…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Revolutions In The 1800s

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Comparing Revolutions Paper Revolutions have occurred throughout history and will continue to do so in the future. Between 1774 and 1830, several significant revolutions took place that have had a profound impact on the world we live in today. However, each revolution has its own unique characteristics and differences in how they occurred and impacted different parts of the world. By examining and comparing these similarities and differences, we can gain a deeper understanding of how these revolutions are interconnected. Starting with a common word that is used in revolutions, revolts.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Revolutions In The 1800s

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Comparing Revolutions Paper Revolutions have occurred throughout history and will continue to do so in the future. Between 1774 and 1830, several significant revolutions took place that have had a profound impact on the world we live in today. However, each revolution has its own unique characteristics and differences in how they occurred and impacted different parts of the world. By examining and comparing these similarities and differences, we can gain a deeper understanding of how these revolutions are interconnected. Starting with a common word that is used in revolutions, revolts.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history there were many revolutions in the world. Some had huge impacts on what the world is today, while others were just dust in the wind. Some of the major impacts in this world was the American, French and Mexican revolutions. All of these revolutions were based on trying to earning freedom from tyrants.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been many cases throughout history for why revolutions have occurred. A harsh government, an unfair and favored higher class, debt, agriculture, freedom, and etc. In 1910-1920 the Mexican revolution became the center of attention in what now is El Paso, Texas. Before the revolution since 1876, Porfirio Diaz was the dictator of Mexico. Diaz was the type of ruler who had too much power and abused the power to commit brutal actions. In doing so he generated conditions in which his political opponents soon enough felt over the edge. Due to Diaz’ harsh government, the war was starting to be the start of the revolution. But was it necessary? The Mexican revolution was necessary to change the oppressive government, grievance of the peons…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two most common types of regimes are democracy and oligarchy. All regimes desire to be wealthy, therefore all regimes are oligarchical to some extent, but more specifically oligarchies are regimes where the wealthy rule. Democracies on the other hand are defined as the rule of the majority, which is assuming that the majority ruling are the poor. One main point that Aristotle usually refers back to about the possible arrangements for regimes is that the rule of law is fundamental to all regimes. Without the rule of law, there is no regime, as Aristotle states: "for where the laws do not rule there is no regime." He also mentions that "the law should rule in all matters, while the offices and the regime should judge in particular cases." Aristotle does recognize that law has limitations, that being it cannot specify how it should be applied to each…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays