Comparing Alexander Hamilton And Thomas Jefferson
Compare & Contrast Essay
After George Washington resigned from presidency, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson took matters into their own hands and created political parties. Alexander Hamilton became the leader of the Federalists while Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were the leaders of the Democratic-Republicans. Hamilton was born in St. Croix in the Caribbeans and moved to New York after people had read his story over the hurricane in the Caribbeans. When he married, his wife’s family supported him in being a representative of New York. Thomas Jefferson was born in Virginia to an old and respectable family. Jefferson was a gifted child and entered college at the age of 16. Because he could not speak for himself in public, he would …show more content…
Their views on human nature, form of government, ideal economy, the Constitution, etc, were nowhere near similar. For instance, the two leaders’ viewpoint on the best form of government were distinct from each other. I think that Hamilton and Jefferson should have combined both of their perspectives together to create the best government they could. Both of them had good ideas on how it should be run or by who. However, one was strong and the other was a little weak. Hamilton’s view on the government to me is a cliche. When it comes to running a country or even a small business, the only people who are believed to run them the best are rich, intelligent men. If you think about it thoroughly, these men probably didn’t start out wealthy until they were given jobs and became greedy with the money they earned. I think men would have to be smart, but don’t have to be wealthy to run a government or business. Jefferson had a very unique view on government. I thought it was clever to have a government that isn’t so strict so the people could enjoy their freedom, while Hamilton wanted a strong government. The only thing that could go wrong with Jefferson’s government, is eventually people will start to take advantage of all the freedom they have, which could lead to chaos in the
After George Washington resigned from presidency, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson took matters into their own hands and created political parties. Alexander Hamilton became the leader of the Federalists while Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were the leaders of the Democratic-Republicans. Hamilton was born in St. Croix in the Caribbeans and moved to New York after people had read his story over the hurricane in the Caribbeans. When he married, his wife’s family supported him in being a representative of New York. Thomas Jefferson was born in Virginia to an old and respectable family. Jefferson was a gifted child and entered college at the age of 16. Because he could not speak for himself in public, he would …show more content…
Their views on human nature, form of government, ideal economy, the Constitution, etc, were nowhere near similar. For instance, the two leaders’ viewpoint on the best form of government were distinct from each other. I think that Hamilton and Jefferson should have combined both of their perspectives together to create the best government they could. Both of them had good ideas on how it should be run or by who. However, one was strong and the other was a little weak. Hamilton’s view on the government to me is a cliche. When it comes to running a country or even a small business, the only people who are believed to run them the best are rich, intelligent men. If you think about it thoroughly, these men probably didn’t start out wealthy until they were given jobs and became greedy with the money they earned. I think men would have to be smart, but don’t have to be wealthy to run a government or business. Jefferson had a very unique view on government. I thought it was clever to have a government that isn’t so strict so the people could enjoy their freedom, while Hamilton wanted a strong government. The only thing that could go wrong with Jefferson’s government, is eventually people will start to take advantage of all the freedom they have, which could lead to chaos in the