Preview

Compare/Contrast China an India

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
344 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare/Contrast China an India
Compare/Contrast China and India China and India China and India were both very advanced ancient civilizations. Both agricultural based civilizations made various technological advances. Although China and India shared many similarities, they had differences such as the social system, politics, and the importance of trade in the economy. The hierarchy of ancient China and India were similar with a noticeable sign of select individuals being considered “higher” then others. The caste system was strict in India and prohibited other classes from interacting with each other. China’s social system differed from India’s caste system, by not demonstrating a formal and strict social ladder. Where in India there existed over three hundred subcastes at one point, China had a simple three caste social ladder. Although the Chinese did not have as strong of a social ladder, there still existed “higher” people such as the bureaucrats. Bureaucrats and landowners were considered to be of a higher class then peasants, farmers,

Is this essay helpful? Upgrade your account to read more and access more than 700,000 just like it! get better grades and merchants. Patriarchy was a very big factor in culture and social order in China and India. India’s strict caste system led to a more “flexible” and popular religion known as Hinduism. Many Indians preferred this religion over Buddhism, which the Chinese practiced, because the brahmans or priests strongly influenced the population. Brahmans and many other Indians did not like the idea of any being of any caste level achieving “peace” by their efforts, which Buddhism taught. The Chinese believed in Buddhism and reaching nirvana by finding peace within. A major difference between Indian and Chinese culture was that Indians lived to die and reincarnate to a better caste level and eventually reaching the gods, whereas the Chinese lived a good life with no rituals necessary to find nirvana. Although the Chinese and Indian culture

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Both Rome and Han China’s civilizations applied the same method of economical production. Agriculture was the main factor within the Roman and Han Chinese economies . During annual harvests both empires received a certain percentage of revenue which funded government activities. The class structures included in the Rome and Han China civilizations were very different from one another. An opportunity for improvement of an individual’s economic and social status was very limited in China; whereas in Rome, it was not so limited. Trade and the lack of interference from the Roman government resulted in more economic mobility within the hierarchy. Additionally, Rome and Han China also compared in their agriculture.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China had many differences involving religion, technology, and women in society, but the similarities in these three subjects outnumber the amount of differences. Women in Rome and China had many of the same responsibilities. Technology in China was more advanced, but Rome was on top of advancing the field of architecture. Religion allowed these two empires to be alike but also different over the course of their reign. Differences make an empire unique, but similarities connect empires throughout the world.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the civilizations that we studied thus far have some type of social class and inequality between the citizens. In both the Chinese and Roman societies, they both maintained social classes. In the Han and Qin dynasties, the social classes were divided by philosophy. For example, Confucianism. Confucianism is the idea that people should have respect for one another and it is better to be a gentleman than just a normal person. If you were a scholar-gentry were considered to be upper classman. You would be the people governing society. Changes in social class were completely out of the question. In the Roman Empire, they didn’t stress hierarchy. You were either upper or a lower class citizen. You could change your rank in social…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical China and India had differences in territorial governing as well as religious freedom, but compared with how they expanded their territory. China's main focus was political and army related, while India specifically focused on their primary religions. Both civilizations differed with how they ruled and lived, but they both experienced their own set of political…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Qin and Han dynasties of Classical China developed a kind of government called bureaucracy. The Qin stressed central authority, while the Hans expanded the powers of bureaucracy. In addition, Legalism was developed. India’s political features involved regionalism and diversity in political forms, unlike China’s bureaucracy. It is the reason why the Guptas did not require…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The foundations were set for these two Classical developing empires: China, separated from other developing empires and India, supported by them. While both Classical China and India had hierarchy’s based on agriculture and organized patriarchal societies, India developed multiple institutions, such as language, while China developed one united dialect.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical China and Classical India have many similarities, but some ideas like politics and the social classes can differ from one or another. Politics was a way on how these classical civilizations had a government and what made the government had power to lead their civilization. Social class was a way to put people in ranks which was also a way for the different types of jobs they did. Politics also goes with social class since it showed that only certain types of people could be in the government.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han V Gupta

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the classical era, China and India emerged as the two powerhouses of the East asia region. Despite both empires using similar tools to implement social and political control, there are minute differences in beliefs and regional demographics that change the way these techniques are implemented. Both cultures used military dominance, a strong leader figure and previously established social hierarchies to remain in power. However, while the Chinese formed a strong, centralized government during the Han Dynasty, the Gupta remained fragmented and regionalized. Furthermore, while both cultures used moral codes and social guidelines to maintain social order, the Indian form was more religious, while Chinese version remained secular and focused on Confucianism and Daoism. Despite their differences, both empires were effective at maintaining order, and there methods are still being used today.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    China and Rome were astonishing civilizations that managed to advance technology and civilations. Both civilizations were rapidly growing and making changes to the world. The two cultures were pretty similar, yet very different. Their religions were something to be modest about. When it came to religion it helped the decline of both societies, by religion changing. When it came to technology though, its change is what caused the societies to flourish. As for education the both leaders of China and Rome worked on making it easier, evident from the letters, for common people to gain knowledge. Changing things in their kingdom clearly took time. With politics being something of a fight in many respects; came as part living in an ancient society. Peaceful changes in power was a rare occasion in Rome but, highly common in China. Both societies treated each other differently, no matter if it was regarding slaves, or women. The underclass was not treated well not out of hate but out of a well beaten attitude that whoever they were, somehow they were always better. Both societies were similar yet highly different it’s surprising how it came about. When two societies emerge like the Romans and Chinese, we would expect conflict, yet none came about, here is a look into both societies as truly empires.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical India had a very complex system of hierarchy known as the caste system. The caste system developed during the Vedic and Epic ages and became steadily more complex as a way of dividing people into social classes. The caste system was racially based, so a person was born into a caste, or jati, with no way of changing his or her status individually. Whole jatis could raise their social standing, but violating rules…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and China were two of the most powerful civilizations in classical Europe and Asia and they lasted for hundreds of years. They controlled trade in the silk road, provided many contributions to modern life, and the classical world. Rome and China are very identical in the process of their collapse and emergence of new religions, yet they differ in the type of government they used.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both China and India have dynastic-like periods of government during their classical eras. China possessed four main dynasties, the Shang, the Zhou, the Qin, and the Han, while India was run by empires such as the Mauryans, the Guptas, and the Kushans, which is most likely because both of their lines of kings was often changing due to decline in tax revenue, social divisions, internal rebellion, and invasions. However, China was intensely focused on bureaucracy while India did not develop very solid political institutions. China possessed bureaucrats and local warrior-landlords during the Zhou and Han dynasties, and India brought forth autocratic emperors as well as aristocratic assemblies, and did not stress great importance on political values or service. This is mainly due to the importance of local units of government and the social relationships inside the Indian caste system, with the religious leaders at the head of government. Furthermore, regionalism was at a high in India, while China was usually unified under one powerful emperor. At one time, Ashoka was a powerful leader in India, but China is famous for having leaders such as Qin Shi Huangdi and Wu Ti. Again, this is mainly due to the Indian emphasis on big local government.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The hierarchy of ancient China and India were similar with a noticeable sign of select individuals being considered “higher” then others. The caste system was strict in India and prohibited other classes from interacting with each other. China’s social system differed from India’s caste system, by not demonstrating a formal and strict social ladder. Where in India there existed over three hundred subcastes at one point, China had a simple three caste social ladder. Although the Chinese did not have as strong of a social ladder, there still existed “higher” people such as the bureaucrats. Bureaucrats and landowners were considered to be of a higher class then peasants, farmers, and merchants. Patriarchy was a very big factor in culture and social order in China and India. India’s strict caste system led to a more “flexible” and popular religion known as Hinduism. Many Indians preferred this religion over Buddhism, which the Chinese practiced, because the brahmans or priests strongly influenced the population. Brahmans and many other Indians did not like the idea of any being of any caste level achieving “peace” by their efforts, which Buddhism taught. The Chinese believed in Buddhism and reaching nirvana by finding peace within. A major difference between Indian and Chinese culture was that Indians lived to die and reincarnate to a better caste level and eventually reaching the gods, whereas the Chinese lived a good life with no rituals necessary to find nirvana. Although the Chinese and Indian culture was very different, both races strived and lived in balance to find their gift in the afterlife. A major difference between the Chinese and Indian culture was that…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around 5,000 years ago early civilizations settled near rivers. Ancient China civilizations established on the Huang-He River Valley, while early Mesopotamian civilizations settled near the Tigris and Euphrates River Valley. While both Huang-He River Valley and Mesopotamia have similar politics they also differed in the interactions with the environment and economics.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A.P.J Abdul Kalam

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Is this Essay helpful? Join OPPapers to read more and access more than 200,000 just like it!…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics