Preview

Compare and contrast two beliefs about life after death. Assess which of these two views may provide a stronger philosophical basis for belief in life after death?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1412 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and contrast two beliefs about life after death. Assess which of these two views may provide a stronger philosophical basis for belief in life after death?
One definition of death is the the complete and permanent cessation of all vital functions in a living creature, the end if life. All philosophers agree that our earthly life in our physical form will end; however philosophers disagree on the meaning of end of life as many people agree on death as the end of our existence however while others argue that we continue in some form after death. Many ideas relating to our existence after death include; the continuation of our genes thought our descendants, immortality of the soul, resurrection of the body, reincarnation and the idea that we live on in memories of others. Many religious beliefs are based on the idea that humans possess a "soul" or "spirit" which exists independently of the body. The notion of life after death is therefore of central concern to religious believers and it is important to establish what surviving death exactly means. There are two main theories developed for the meaningful survival after death: materialism and dualism.

Materialism is the theory that our minds are inseparable from our bodies. Materialism is the view that only that which we can come to knowledge of empirically and do not accept the existence of a separate soul as it cannot be verified. It is based on and understanding of the universe that has one substance only, that being material, and generally a belief that the universe is governed by cause and effect. Materialists do not accept separate part to our body called the soul; they argue that an individual is living, physical body and nothing more therefore at death, the body dies and with it the whole individual ceases to exist. There are two forms of materialism; soft materialism and hard materialism.

Hard materialists, claim that the only substances are material objects, an individual characteristics are nothing more then physical ones. Any idea is consciousness is nothing more then brain activity. Mind is not separate of body so when the body dies so does the brain.



Bibliography: S and A Level Religious Studies: Philosophy and EthicsPhilosophy of Religion for A Level Second Edition (Paperback) by Anne Jordan, Neil Locker, Edwin TateEdexcel AS Religious Studies: Student Book (Paperback) by Ms Sarah K Tyler, Mr Gordon Reid, Mr Jon Mayled, Dominique Messent, Gopinder Kaur , Ms Jennifer SmithExamining Philosophy and Ethics Answers for A Level (Paperback) by Patrick Clarke

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Uns 2030 Study Guide

    • 7207 Words
    • 29 Pages

    Materialism is the idea that everything is either made only of matter or is ultimately…

    • 7207 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Australian Materialism

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The views of the Australian materialists on the identification of the mind and the body, simply stated, are that states and processes of the mind are identical to states and processes of the brain. Henceforth these philosophers (for the purpose of this article I will be referring in particular to Smart and Armstrong’s views on the matter) assume the position that all processes of the mind and experiences are due to physical reactions occurring in the brain and that these physical processes can account for the mental states that one may encounter. Smart’s takes a Materialist stance regarding the identification of the mind and body, and a more scientific one at that, believing that everything…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physicalism is the view that everything that exists is physical, or depends on something that is physical. For a physicalist, the mind is not a substance or a thing. It is more accurate to talk of mental properties, mental events, mental states and processes. We can then say that these properties (etc) are possessed not by a mind, but by a person or brain, which are physical objects. In short, mental states are brain (physical) states, says the type identity theorist. Therefore, thinking a thought or feeling an itch is exactly the same thing as certain neurones firing.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dualism is the belief that reality consists of two different, separate substances: that of the mental and that of the physical. "In philosophy of mind, the belief that the mental and physical are deeply different in kind: thus the mental is at least not identical with the physical." It directly opposes materialism, as dualism dictates that the mind is unidentifiable to the body, as opposed to stating that the mind and body exist as one. The concept of dualism is not only fundamental in philosophy, but also affects our thoughts on science, religion and psychology: for example, if a convincing rejection of dualism can be formulated, the materialist approach of modern science will be vindicated. If, conversely, dualism can be convincingly maintained, then our evidence obtained from studies of the brain would simply not suffice in gaining any form of insight into the human mind. Dualism is a logical necessity: sustained as a question that does not need to be answered as it can be fulfilled a priori, owing to the fact that humans have the ability to seek introspection regularly. Indeed, we experience the separation between our body and mind, which would support the notion that they are separate entities and empirical evidence is not required to prove such a concept. However, this does not mean that dualistic theory is foolproof: for example, can our experience be enough to prove such a concept? Indeed, many philosophers are not in favour of dualistic ontology. In the course of addressing this question, the origins of the mind and body problem will be discussed, which will then permit a fully focussed evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of Cartesian Interactionist Dualism. Whilst looking at the support for Descartes' theory I will explore arguments from Madell, David Chalmers and T.H Huxley amongst others. Conversely, whilst addressing the criticism of Interactionist Dualism, I will explore the works of Ryle, Hume and Williams. Finally, the wider implications that…

    • 4596 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life After Death Essay

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Of all human stages of development and transition, none of them has profound effect and overwhelming disturbance as death. The surviving members of the deceased’s family and other close loved ones are always at a loss and the grieving that ensues thereafter is of untold emotional torment (Sherman et al., 2003). On the spiritual perspective, death is mourned with the recluse and thought of continuance of life after death. Death is increasingly being viewed as a rite of passage and is not a finality as previously perceived in the preceding ages of our current generations. However, this perspective is speculative in nature for there is no living human being that has marched on with the personal study of the afterlife and come back to life in human…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Materialist Theory

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view that I have selected and decided to analysed, explained and defend is the materialist theory. The main reason for my choice of this view over the idealist one is that, in my opinion, empiricism shows us humans and provide hard evidence which I will detailed in this opinion piece that matter does exists and we are surrounded by it on a day to day basis. The great Philosopher John Locke express his opinion which I clearly agree with that our minds have no ideas and concepts when we are born, as such we develop and gain knowledge over time from experiences. Without experiencing sensation or reflection we generally would not be able to differentiate the differences between physical properties such as shapes, size, texture or colour. For…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Monism vs Dualism

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are different renditions of materialism known among modern philosophers. One rendition of materialism is called eliminative materialism. Eliminative materialism implies that there are no such things as thoughts, pains, and feelings but that our brain is simply made up of events that cause these emotions (Morris p159). For example, if a person puts their hand on a hot stove and jumps, the cause of that jump was the brain and not the stove. Another rendition of materialism is known as reductive materialism. Contrary to the belief of eliminative materialism, reductive materialism illustrates that sensations such as feelings do exist, and that brain events are the cause of those thoughts, pains, and feelings…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, reincarnation tends to support the sense of an afterlife because it shows that our souls can live on in another being once our physical body has died. There tends to be less evidence for this belief however, it does give people hope that there is something to believe in after death. Finally, psychics who can communicate with the dead show believers that people that have passed are still in a place where their souls can be happy. Ultimately, psychics show us that the souls of our loves ones can watch over us and can still be involved in our lives without us knowing. All of these claims however, have critics and skeptics that do not support them. Rachels in his essay “Do We Survive Death?” points out many of the criticisms for these arguments and tends to show the reader that he does not believe in an afterlife for the soul. I tended to listen to Rachels argument and take it into consideration however, I usually…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mind Body Debate

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Monism is a scientific approach. In this theory the mind and soul are separate from the physical body. Everything is physical so the mind only influences the body.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Study Of Materialism

    • 4170 Words
    • 17 Pages

    "Put bluntly, the view is just this: Everything that actually exists is material, or physical.[i]" What does this practically mean? Materialists do not believe in a god, a spiritual realm, or the supernatural. They believe that the incorporeal world is dependent on the corporal world. For example if the body did not exist, the mind, spirit, or soul, wouldn't either. This further leads to a world where if mental awareness did not exist, then ideals such as love, or hate, or thoughts, or any other non-physical entity simply would not exist due to a lack of perception. "Esse est percipi," George Berkeley's famous dictum, "to be is to be perceived" befits materialism quite well. Materialism takes empiricism to its extreme, where it leads one to live in world where no moral absolutes exist, due to a lack of anything that would be immutable. Materialism lacks a foundation from which to build moral absolutes. As such, the natural alternative would be to go off whatever mankind, a society, or even independent individuals are currently supporting. This type of society, seeing no moral absolutes, simply invests in itself. Why? Because there is no motivation, no higher power, no real reason to help out anyone but you. Also since there is no eternal soul, there is no afterlife, since once the body is dead, the mind and soul die, there is no reason to live for anything but the here and now. As such you would pursue that which…

    • 4170 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dulists argue that the mind and body are distinct in substance: the body being made up of physical matter and then mind uniquely being made up of an immaterial substance. Commonly this has been called the soul, spirit or energy…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Dualism (eg: Descartes): The mental and the physical are two distinct realities, composed of fundamentally different "stuffs" - irreducibility. The real you is not your physical/material body, but a nonspatial, ghostly, perhaps spiritual thinking substance: "mind stuff" (Churchland, 1984).…

    • 2530 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy

    • 5930 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Materialism (physicalism): a metaphysical theory, developed by the PreSocratic philosophers, that says that everything, including a person’s thoughts, consciousness, and personality, is composed of matter…

    • 5930 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Hellenistic period we see a need for salvation from death. Due to the culture shock that many people experienced when the borders of different countries and cultures were erased, many people became pessimistic, started to doubt there religions and experienced the break-up of culture. The same is happening today as the internet and television make the world “smaller” in the sense that we are much more aware of the happenings world wide and capable of communicating ideas and perspectives easily through the internet and the international distributions of books for example. This vast variety of ideas and principles have created the same confusion and doubt that was experienced during the Hellenistic period. Back then Philosophy became more…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In our search for truth, one of the most common concept tackled is the concept of death. Since all human beings will cease to exist at one point in time, it would seem absurd to try to achieve so much just to render them useless upon our death in this material world. For if we believe that after our death in the material world there will be nothing more, even the argument that we live for the people around us or for the greatness we feel because of success would be futile because the bottom line would be that we will all die and our relationships nor our successes will not matter.…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays