Preview

Compare And Contrast The Three Fifths Compromise

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
525 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast The Three Fifths Compromise
The three-fifths compromise was system in between the states to determine a person who is enslaved as a three-fifths of a person. The south was overpopulated and continued to grow due to slavery James Wilson proposed this in 1787 and this showed how proslavery was forced during those times. Because the Virginia Plan was denied, the three-fifths compromise was suggested and made the cut for the south to be powerfully represented in the House of Representatives and have too much power when electing presidents. Compared to the northerner states they seemed to disregard slavery. The difference between he northerner states and southern was that the northerner states counted one free man as one vote and one slave not a vote to southern states counting the slaves as a vote as well as one free man as a vote. The constitution also supported the three-fifths compromise. In the constitution, Article 1 section II, it states, “The House of Representatives shall be composed of …show more content…
The Fifth Amendment made sure no personal or property shall be in danger twice and private property could not be trespassed. The Dred Scott case viewed the three-fifths compromise differently than the constitution; meaning one was supported and the other was not. The constitution declared political power amongst the states while the Dred Scott case fought for slaves to be free. Comparing both made me understand the issues that were debated and the history behind each one. Being free in who you are or who you want to be is very important and that is why I agree with the Dred Scott case. Today, federal spending is a based on congressional representation instead of the relative population. With knowing this, it shows how things with representation issues are still being administered and how history keeps going and some may repeat
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3
    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3

    One of the first main issues that required compromise to create a reasonable solution was the enactment of tariffs on the south. The main export of the south was cotton. Cotton was what supplied the south with almost all of its money. In about 1828 to 1833 the first major conflict between the north and south was created during the Tariff or Nullification Crisis. In 1828, the North enacted a tariff on the south that severely affected their cotton trade. The tax rates were as high as forty five to fifty percent. The tariffs were nicknamed the "Tariffs of Abominations" because the south was so disgusted at the high rates it was facing. The south spoke out against these high rates and the north lowered the tariff rates to thirty three percent. Despite lowering the tariff, South Carolina decided that they were not going to follow the tariff, and not pay it. The reasoning the state had was that they thought they should not have to follow any sort of law or tax that was not beneficial to themselves. South Carolina nullified the tariff and didn't pay them. The north was outraged at this act. The north thought that the if South Carolina was able to repeal the tariff and ignore it, who would be able to stop them from ignoring laws regarding slavery? The north and the federal government were offended and angry. An example of their displeasure is shown in Henry Clay's speech to the Senate when he states "I merely throw out these sentiments for the purpose of showing you that South Carolina having…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your
    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your

    The issue of slavery became an even greater concern when the Louisiana Purchase territories were to enter the Union as states. The question was, would new territories enter the Union as slave or free states? The South wanted a balance of power. They knew that if the North were to have more free states, then slavery in the south could be facing extinction through congress. In an attempt to conciliate with the South, the North agreed upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through this, slavery was banned above the 36 degrees 30 minute line and Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine a free state. For a while, it retained the balance of power. However, tempers in the south rose again later in the 1820s over high tariffs. The tariffs benefitted the north but threatened southern cotton exports. In 1828, the tariff was around 50%. President Jackson modified it to around 33% in 1832 only to have South Carolina nullify it in the state. It raised the question of whether or not the federal government could legally impose protective tariffs and whether it was constitutional for a state to nullify a federal law. "South…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott Vs. Furguson: The Supreme Court Case
    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dred Scott Vs. Furguson: The Supreme Court Case

    Dred Scott vs Sanford was a very important political case and was one of the first case towards equal rights for everybody. Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri and he sued the state of Missouri for his freedom. In this time Missouri was a free state and therefore he stated that he could be free from slavery. Although he was free, the state of Missouri considered him property and could not be taken away from his owner. Not to mention Minorities in this time we're not considered citizens and couldn't have freedom if they were a slave.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sop Essay Sample
    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sop Essay Sample

    9.1 tablespoon of the Three-Fifths Compromise. This flavorful agreement only three-fifths of a state's slave population would count when determining representation.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Three Fifths Compromise
    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Three Fifths Compromise

    date of their ratification was on December 7, 1787. Richard Bassett was one of the four delegates of Deleware who signed the constitution. The other delegates were Gunning Bedford, Jacob Broom, John Dickinson and George Read.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis
    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis

    In 1787 the three-fifths compromise was enacted. It was one of the most controversial topics at the time. The three-fifths compromise was a way for southerners to ensure that they weren’t out-numbered in the House of Representative. James Williams, a northern coincidentally proposed the three-fifths act. It didn’t benefit the north because they…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation
    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    The Northerners opposed slavery, whereas the agriculture dependent Southerners supported it. It was on this issue that the most acerbic debates took place. For the unity and efficiency of the whole country, both sides gave in and made the most famous of the compromises, the Three-Fifth Clause, which won unanimous approval. Not wanting to loose the valuable revenues from the South, the Northerners compromised again in the Constitution by prohibiting Congress from outlawing the slave trade for at least twenty years in order to appeal to the masses. Was this necessarily the right and just decision? No. But it undeniably guaranteed the South as a part of the…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Significance And Background Of The Dred Scott Case
    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page

    Significance And Background Of The Dred Scott Case

    This article talks about the significance and background of the Dred Scott case. In fact this actually hurt the cause of anti-slavery because now, slavery could spread into the free states. Now, the free states laws that used to create this safe haven for the fugitive slaves, now no longer have any power because the Constitution, debatably the strongest document the United States has, contradicts any law protecting slaves. This is because the United States Constitution protects all property of the individual, and slaves to the southern people in the 1850’s thought of slaves as property.…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Role of Compromise in Delaying the Civil War
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Role of Compromise in Delaying the Civil War

    The Compromise of 1850 was made to settle issues between North and South about territory and slavery that was caused by the Mexican-American War. There were five bills made. The first bill was that California was a free state. The second state was that Texas would be paid compensation by the government for giving California and New Mexico up. The third bill was that New Mexico was a new state without any specific prohibition of slavery. The fourth bill was that there would be no slave trade in Washington DC. The fifth bill was that if a slave ran away, people would have to chase after it no matter what. Even though this was a compromise, the North and South didn’t really like it that much. Texas especially didn’t like it because they lost a lot of territory.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Are The Differences Between Hamilton And The Federalists
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Are The Differences Between Hamilton And The Federalists

    One of the biggest issues contested during the Constitutional Convention was the fate of the slave trade. Northern states wanted it abolished largely because of the negotiated three-fifths rule which allowed slaves to be counted toward the number of delegates the House of Representatives would have. Southern representatives rebuked this idea completely and threatened to walk out of the Convention. Since the cooperation of the Southern states was crucial for the creation of a strong federal government, Northern delegates made considerable compromises. These compromises included extending the slave trade until 1808, the prohibition of taxing slave exports, and the implementation of the Fugitive Slave…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On The Crittenden Compromise
    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On The Crittenden Compromise

    First, the Crittenden Compromise was important to the history of America because it let the south have slaves, and the north to ban them forever. The Crittenden Compromise was written by Senator John J. Crittenden in December, 1860. It had six amendments and it stated that north of 36°30' latitude would not be allowed slaves, but the south would. It was denied from passing Congress by Republicans and Abraham Lincoln. The Republicans denied it because they wanted more areas to have slaves, however Lincoln opposed it because he believed that there should be less area.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Three Fifths Compromide Of Slavery In American History
    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Three Fifths Compromide Of Slavery In American History

    The Three Fifths Compromise made it fair for all involved or so the states would want us to believe such nonsense. The population numbers detremine the taxes as well the representation of each state. Who would be counted as population in the census became a big debate among the states.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Compromises
    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Constitutional Compromises

    When the Constitution was being written, adjustments had to be made along the way. These adjustments came in the form of compromises and were made in order to try and please everyone involved. Among considered plans were: the Virginia Plan, the New Jersey Plan, the Connecticut Compromise, and the 3/5’s Compromise. Each of these were very important to the creation of the final draft of the Constitution.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Great Compromise
    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Great Compromise

    The Great Compromise was the solution to struggle of representation in the Legislative Branch during the U.S Constitutional Convention in 1787. The states with bigger populations like Virginia favored the Virginia Plan. The Virginia Plan called for representation based on the amount of people living in each state. Larger states favored this plan because they would have more power in making laws. On the other hand, smaller states like Delaware favored the New Jersey Plan, under which each state would send the same amount of representatives to Congress. Smaller states favored this because it meant equal power for everyone. This problem was solved by Roger Sherman. He proposed a bicameral legislature. Each state, as suggested by Sherman, would send an equal amount of Representatives to the House of Senate, and one representative for every 30,000 citizens to the House of Representatives. Today, the variable number of members of the House of Representatives is based on the State’s population as reported in the most recent decennial census. The process of determining the number of members of the House from each state is known as apportionment. Apportionment is the process of allocating the 435 House seats among the states according to each state’s population.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise
    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    The ratification of the United States Constitution depended on the agreement of the North and the South, and the issue of slavery was a major obstruction to this agreement. Each state’s representation was determined by the number of person’s residing in that state. The North did not want to count the slaves as part of this number because it would mean less representation for them in the government. Their argument was that since slaves were considered property, they should be equated with other chattel property, like cattle and mules. The South, on the other hand, was determined to count slaves into their population due to the high proportion of slaves in the southern region of the country. Without the support of the South, the ratification of the Constitution was doubtful, so the 3/5 Compromise was written. Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution states that “population for the purposes of representation and taxation would be determined by adding the whole number of free people, including indentured servants, plus 3/5 of all slaves”. This was also called The Enumeration Clause.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics