Compare And Contrast The First Emperor Of China And Augustus Caesar

The First Emperor of China and Rome’s Augustus Caesar both helped shape their kingdoms into great empires, but their tactics in doing so are every different. The First emperor of China took a more direct approach to his leadership. He concurred all the land around him and changed many laws to restrict his citizens from freedoms. Augustus Caesar was considered a peoples person and often attended live shows and plays. He believed that thru peace and harmony his country would be able to thrive. These great leaders both achieved dominance and power throughout their leadership but only one of them died as a hero while the other died as a hated man. In this paper I will compare and contrast the ways these leaders shaped their countries and the effect it had on the way their people viewed them. The leaders of these countries both had very strong standing armies and used these forces to take over other lands and enforce rules. Augustus wanted to
Augustus believed that power must be spread out and democracy should be the best form of government. He, “transferred the republic from my own control to the will of the senate and the Roman people” (Res Gestae 34). This gave the people more power to influence laws and made them feel more involved in Rome, in return his people were happier about how he ruled his kingdom. The First emperor of China was the only person who made decisions in china. Any rule or law passed was due to direct order from himself. This would often lead to misjudgment and unjust laws. “The First Emperor was greedy and short-sighted, confident in his own wisdom, never trusting his meritorious officials, never getting to know his people” (Sima Qian 8). He did not care about his people and would only look to better himself. This self-centered leadership resulted in hated for the emperor and many failed assassination attempts on