Preview

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Federalists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
578 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Federalists
It was the year of 1787 and the country was in conflict. The new constitution had just been written and states were deciding to ratify it (Davidson, 205). This constitution would hopefully protect better than the Articles of Confederation did. As with many other situations, there were two sides; the Federalists and the Antifederalists. Federalists agree with the Constitution while Antifederalists disagree (Davidson, 205). Each side had valid arguments, but the Federalists more so. Federalists argued to support the Constitution because it allots the federal government power over trade and tax, gives each branch checks and balances on one another, and can be changed. One argument of the Federalists was that the Constitution gives the federal
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq
    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti-Federalists
    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, had disparate visions about how the country should be administered, which would cause a complication with our founding fathers, who formulated a way to run the country. Federalists assumed to have a forceful central government, central bank. Federalists presumed that in a government, checks and balance works out, so there is no tension between individuals. With Federalists, they remained with the strong central governments, whereas the Anti- Federalists wanted to remain with the British government. In the Anti- Federalists, they always thought that the army would cause great destruction. Centinel No 1, states that "The Congress may construe every purpose for which the state legislatures now lay taxes,…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Articles of Confederation - Ap U.S History Dbq Essay
    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Articles of Confederation - Ap U.S History Dbq Essay

    1. "From 1781 to 1787 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." Using the documents and your knowledge of the period, evaluate this statement.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation
    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    Although it provided an outline to how future government should be formed, The Articles of Confederation did not provide America with an effective government from 1781 to 1789. Nicknamed “The Articles of Confusion”, The Articles of Confederation lacked stability and the power to truly govern the states. Under the articles there was no executive branch and no way for the federal government to raise money.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of 1787 with Regard: to Powers of Congress, Powers of the Executive, and Powers Vested in the States
    • 603 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare and Contrast the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of 1787 with Regard: to Powers of Congress, Powers of the Executive, and Powers Vested in the States

    Women have always had a dominant role in the prosperity and growth of any community. These roles have changed depending on the time period, geography and race of the people. America had three most important groups of women: the Native Indian, the African, and the European. These three groups came from exceptionally different backgrounds, and played dissimilar roles in their family and community.…

    • 603 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq4: Ratifying the Constitution
    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dbq4: Ratifying the Constitution

    The major arguments in the debate over the ratification over the U.S Constitution were the rights of individuals verses the rights of the states, the supporters and the opponents, were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Both sides the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists are debating to win the support of our nation.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Supporters Of The US Constitution
    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Supporters Of The US Constitution

    debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation
    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    The American system of government following the end of the American Revolution was a disaster as far as the nation’s status as a union. Under the Articles of Confederation, there was nothing “unified” about the United States. The states stood in the union as individual bodies, with little to no ties to a seemingly non-existent central governing body or to the other states. This allowed the states to disregard other states’ laws and ultimately created disunion within the states. Because it has been proven that the states cannot stand alone and sufficiently govern themselves without a strong central government, the national government should be the supreme law of the land.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution
    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

    The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution were both recognized and followed by the same group of people. Even though the same group of people followed these two documents, these documents are very different. One example is the writing style of each document. The Articles of Confederation were repetitive, less direct and less certified for quoting than the Constitution. The two documents have a different approach towards the type of government and its control over the matters.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Differences Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution
    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Differences Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

    The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, although both written documents explaining how the American government would be ran, they have very distinct qualities about them. During the Constitutional Convention, instead of revising the Articles of Confederation as originally planned, those attending the meeting felt that a whole new document needed to be written. Legislation, the sovereignty of states, and the executive branch were all major differences between the two documents.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist vs Anti-Federalist
    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalist vs Anti-Federalist

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How And Why Did They Create A Weak Confederal Arrangement
    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How And Why Did They Create A Weak Confederal Arrangement

    The Founders’ perceptions were that America was weak and de-centralized. They created a weak, confederal government designed to protect people’s liberties by being to small to be a threat, but it was too small to handle national problems. The differences between the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution are that one, the US Constitution has a Bill of Rights, the power of the president is addressed and the separation of the branches. This changed occurred to make the government stronger and address the nation’s problems. The Anti-Federalists were a large group who didn’t like the Constitution but didn’t know what they wanted yet and they contributed to the branches. The Federalist were defenders of the constitution and they contributed to the bill of…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Democratic And Federalists
    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast Democratic And Federalists

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans are very different in the way they think and act. Federalists had a strong federal government and were ruled by a wealthy class while the Democratic republicans had a strong state government and were ruled by people…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

    On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More