Preview

Compare and contrast the Articles of confederation and the Constitution, especially in regard to the specific powers granted to the national government.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1246 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and contrast the Articles of confederation and the Constitution, especially in regard to the specific powers granted to the national government.
Compare and contrast the Articles of confederation and the Constitution, especially in regard to the specific powers granted to the national government.The formation and ideals of the Articles of Confederation and its successor, the Unites States Constitution, varied from each other in terms of a stronger or weaker federal government in dealing with issues. The Constitution gave more power to the federal government, while the Articles of Confederation involved a very weak government with primary rights interests of the individual states as the focus. Both gave Congress legislative power and set up departments that would eventually be incorporated into the president’s cabinet. The formation of the Articles of Confederation was of the extreme importance in the foundation and development of the Constitution and the stronger central government that still lasts to this day. Also known as “The Articles of Confusion”, the Articles of Confederation (finally passed by all thirteen states by 1781) created a “loose confederation” or “firm league of friendship” between the states. There were no judicial branch and executive branch in the new federal /national government, as the previous monarchy of George III still left bad feelings in minds of newly independent Americans, who were instilled with the ideals of being suspicious of government actions and remained filled with democratic zeal. According to the Articles of Confederation, each state had one vote in Congress. This meant the small state of Rhode Island, with its population of 60,000, had the same voice and power as the most populated of the states, Virginia. For a bill to be passed in the Congress, 9 of the 13 states had to approve. For any amendments to be made to the Articles of Confederation, a unanimous decision had to be agreed upon among the states. Amending the Articles was almost impossible, as it was rare for all the states to agree upon a certain issue. If the Articles had been able of being patched up
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Charles Beard’s Article, Framing the Constitution
    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Charles Beard’s Article, Framing the Constitution

    The Articles of Confederation of 1781 produced the first endeavor of government structure. This attempt of forming a national and state government failed. Some of the issues that transpired from the constitution include: Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of state size; Congress did not have the powers to tax or regulate foreign or interstate commerce; There was not a recognized national court system or executive branch to enforce acts passed by Congress; While amendments to the Constitution required a unanimous vote, the passing of a law required a 9/13 vote. The lack of involvement of the national government allowed states to become self-governing and sovereign. States printed their own money that only had value within that territory which created a hindrance in trade and in turn produced an unstable economy. The national government having no enforcing authority and the United States of America was in a state of chaos. This generated an out lash from individuals.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Articles of Confederation
    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Articles of Confederation

    The articles of confederation were introduced in 1777 and this gave the power to individual states. During 1781-1789 the Aricles of Confederation provided the United states with an ineffective movement, however there were some strong steps taken in the articles to try and make the United States a better country. The people of each state were given equal privileges and rights, freedom of movement was guaranteed, and procedures for the trails of accused criminals were outlined. The Articles of Confederation arranged a national government that would consist of a single house of congress, where each state would have one vote. One of the weaknesses was that the Congress could legislate only for states, not for individuals; because of this it could not enforce legislation. The problem of the Articles of Confederation was that limited the power to central government. This meant that the congress had no power to tax. Instead, it was to assess its expenses and divide those amounts the states on the basis of the value of land. States were then to tax their own citizens to raise the month for these expenses and turn the proceeds over to Congress. The states where not forced to do so, and in practice they rarely m…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution: A Synopsis of Its Positives and Negatives
    • 527 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The United States Constitution: A Synopsis of Its Positives and Negatives

    The articles of confederation established a government in which each state kept their freedom and independence (Document 1). Creators of the Articles kept the central government weak intentionally because they feared another monarchy, however, due to this powerless central government, problems arose concerning currency, different exchange rates, and a lack of an effective army or navy outside independent state militias. The founders of the Articles were not blind to these predicaments; thus, a new Constitution was drafted. This document secured the freedoms and liberties of the drafters and the generations to come (Document 5). It also promoted the general welfare, a common defense system, domestic tranquility, and justice.…

    • 527 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Connection Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution
    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Connection Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

    The Articles of Confederation, Shay's Rebellion, and the American Constitution all played a major role in American history and shared a connection. The Articles of Confederation were a limited government, established in 1782, that governed the United States and were later replaced by the US Constitution after Shay's Rebellion. The occurrence of the rebellion exposed many of the Articles of Confederations' weaknesses that included its lack of an army, the inability to tax, and the lack of authority. The US Constitution, which was supported by people known as federalists, was considered…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Differences Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Differences Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

    “Let our government be like that of the solar system. Let the general government be like the sun and the states the planets, repelled yet attracted, and the whole moving regularly and harmoniously in several orbits.” said John Dickinson, a Delaware Delegate in 1787 (constitutionfacts.com). The United States has a government that, for the most part, flows smoothly. However, our governing documents have not always been so harmonious. The Articles of Confederation, created and ratified in 1781 during the Revolutionary War, was the first basis for the United States of America’s central government. This was a shaky set of laws, yet it evolved into The Constitution of the United States of America. Though The Constitution was created from the Articles of Confederation, there were many differences. Three of these are differences in powers, in purposes, and in effects.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Differences Between the Aoc and the Constitution
    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Differences Between the Aoc and the Constitution

    The Articles of Confederation were written by the Continental Congress in an effort to unify the 13 independent and sovereign states into the “United States of America.” The Articles were completed in the late summer of 1777, and were adopted later that year in November. The United States went by this system, without it being ratified, until it was finally ratified on March 1, 1781. With the final ratification, the Articles set forth rules regarding the powers given to, and withheld from the federal government. The power to declare war on other countries, resolving the conflicts with the Western territories, and dealing with any other diplomatic issues that may arise were all powers that were given to the national government. The Articles of Confederation severely hindered the ability of the federal government, while allowing the states’ governments to nearly do as they pleased. The federal government was not permitted to collect taxes from the states, to raise a national military, to regulate interstate or foreign…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why the Articles of Confederation Was Flawed
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why the Articles of Confederation Was Flawed

    The United States under the Articles of Confederation was more a country of thirteen nations rather than thirteen states. Each state had unanimous consent for ratification or amendment of clauses. Congress allowed states to retain all land claims derived from their original charters. That resulted in states with large claims having the ability to overpower their neighbors. An example would be Maryland refusing to accept the Articles until 1781, because they feared that Virginia’s western holdings would be to overpowering under their own jurisdiction. The unicameral legislatures under the Articles were inefficient and unwieldy to govern efficiently. There was no adequate way to distribute power within the national government or to the relationship between the Confederation and the states. The Land Ordinance of 1785 might be considered the major success of the Articles of Confederation, but that law couldn’t even be properly enforced since states wielded so much power. States wielded so much power that they didn’t have to adhere to the division of land set by the government. Of course the whole reason of the Land ordinance of 1785 was because Congress couldn’t levy taxes from the states and had to result selling land for money.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    1985 Dbq
    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1985 Dbq

    The Articles of Confederation set up a unicameral Congress in which each state had one vote. The executive authority would be in a committee of thirteen. The rights which the Articles gave to the federal government were very limited. It was very difficult to get anything done because in order to add an amendment or change something a unanimous decision was required. The powers which were given to the federal government by the Articles of Confederation include: the authority to make war and treaties, as well as the ability to determine the amount of troops and money each state can contribute. However, there was no way for them to enforce it. The federal government…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Articles of Confederation and Articles of Constitution
    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Articles of Confederation and Articles of Constitution

    The Articles of Confederation was written during the War for Independence and at a time when a strong national government was regarded with suspicion. The Articles created a confederacy where most of the power was vested in the states. The confederation's most important accomplishment was its resolution of some of the controversies involving the western lands. The Articles provided a national government with a Congress empowered to declare war, make peace, coin money, appoint officers for an army, control the post office, and negotiate treaties with Indian tribes. States were independent and sovereign to govern within its territories. The Congress was unicameral and each state had one vote in the Continental congress, regardless of its size. The vote of nine states out of thirteen was…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Balance of Liberty and Order
    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Balance of Liberty and Order

    It was not all that surprising that the Articles of Confederation did not have a lasting effect in the American system. It did not have the most positive, strong effect because it was the first written constitution that specified how the national government would be run, therefore it was a trial to test the waters to see if it would be the direction Americans were looking for. Article III describes that, “The said States hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for their common defense, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other, against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretense whatever.” The Articles of Confederation also express the privileges of free citizens in several States and prevent the removal of property. The Articles left most of the power with the state governments and they are necessary for interacting with other governments. The leniency of the rules for each state led to the constitution.[1]…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Major Differences Between the Articles of Confederation vs Constitution
    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Major Differences Between the Articles of Confederation vs Constitution

    The Articles of Confederation had been in effect sine 1781. They established what could be referred to as a "league of friendship" and a quasi-constitution for the states that were sovereign and independent subsequent to the American Revolution. Those articles appeared to be "woefully inadequate" to James Madison. Madison believed that the central government had little power, while the states had considerable power. The central government was not able to tax, or set commercial power, nor could a war effort be effectively supported. It did not have the power to…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    1985 DBQ AP United States History Essay
    • 947 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1985 DBQ AP United States History Essay

    As the first official document that defined the United States government, the Articles of Confederation both reflected the principles and view points of the American Revolution and emphasized the practical uncertainties of democratic government. To say that the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government, would be over-exaggerating quite a bit. The Congress was weak, and was purposely designed to be weak. They were purposely set up as a weak government so that the government could be less threatening. The American government didn't want to be a tyrant like that of the British government. The Articles of Confederations initial intention was to provide a loose confederation or "firm league of friendship." Thirteen independent states were therefore linked together for joint action in dealing with foreign affairs. Despite their fragility, the Articles proved to be a landmark in government, and at that time a model of what a loose confederation should be.…

    • 947 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How The Articles Of Confederation Developed The First Written Constitution Dbq
    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How The Articles Of Confederation Developed The First Written Constitution Dbq

    One major flaw in the Articles of Confederation was that the state governments were given much more power than the central government. For example, the Confederation Congress could not levy taxes without approval of the states. They could only present their ideas to the states, hoping to reach an agreement. When the central government requested a tariff on imported items, the state of Rhode Island refused to pay. This inefficient method of funding resulted in inflation and overall lack of money for the central government. To make an amendment in the Articles of Confederation, all thirteen states had to agree. Although this weak central government was thought of as ineffective in governing the states, it provided equal rights for every state. Each state had the same amount of power, allowing a small state with few people to have the ability to cancel the vote of another state. Many of the states had conflicting views, resulting in large struggles over the amendment of laws. The Articles of Confederation was very effective in supporting small, minority states like Rhode…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Articles of Confederation : an Ineffective Government
    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Articles of Confederation : an Ineffective Government

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the United States were not united at all. The Articles of Confederation created a central government that was not strong at all. The government established a tax quota for each of the states and asked them please to contribute their share on a voluntary basis. They were lucky if the states paid one-fourth of the requested amount. America had just gotten away from England and all of its taxes, so there was no reason to let their own government do the same. In John Jay’s letter to George Washington in 1786, he says that he is more worried about impending crisis caused by the Articles of Confederation than he was about the Revolutionary War. He was thinking that some people were not in agreement with the government and wanted it to be completely gone. He was worried for a good reason because three years earlier there was an attempt by a group of farmers from Pennsylvania to run the government out of Philadelphia. Also, the states acted like their own countries and only looked out for themselves. Rhode Island is a good example of this because they rejected a request by Congress to put a tax on imported goods. They ignored the fact that America was in a massive amount of debt to the Spanish, French and Dutch. They chose to better themselves rather than to better the country. They said that the tax would be hard on their state and would go against the constitution of their state. Rhode Island denied a tax that was suggested by the country’s central government…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Federalists
    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Federalists

    It was the year of 1787 and the country was in conflict. The new constitution had just been written and states were deciding to ratify it (Davidson, 205). This constitution would hopefully protect better than the Articles of Confederation did. As with many other situations, there were two sides; the Federalists and the Antifederalists. Federalists agree with the Constitution while Antifederalists disagree (Davidson, 205). Each side had valid arguments, but the Federalists more so. Federalists argued to support the Constitution because it allots the federal government power over trade and tax, gives each branch checks and balances on one another, and can be changed.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics