Preview

Compare and Contrast Select Leadership Theories

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1397 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast Select Leadership Theories
Compare and Contrast of Select Leadership Models
Leadership comes in different forms and in different aspects of life from private business to government entities (Wren, 1995, p. 5). The models of leadership used are dependent upon the individual attributes of the leaders, for example traits, values, self-identity, skills, and competencies (Yukl, 2013, p. 136). A close look at select leadership models and how they compare and contrast with each other provides insight into the types of leadership that might be employed within organizations as they face various leadership issues and challenges.
In this paper, we will review four leadership models: charismatic, servant, situational, and transformational. A separate discussion describing similarities and differences between the models as they apply. As similarities and differences are identified, we will discuss how contemporary leadership issues and challenges are addressed within the scope of each leadership model.
Leadership Models
Charismatic Leadership A charismatic leader has three key dimensions that Weber (1968) identified as concepts of charisma that include vision or mission, extraordinary or exceptional qualities, and recognition (as cited in Avolio and Yammarino, 2013, p. 167). Transformational leadership closely resembles charismatic leadership as both are vision related and empowering; however the main difference deals with the expectations set by the leader. Charismatic leaders typically set unrealistic expectations based on their vision and ability to motivate and energize their followers (Wren, 1995, p. 110). Transformational leadership changes followers thinking and empowers them to realize that the expectations can be exceeded (Wren, 1995, p. 106). Servant leadership does not possess a strong vision behavior (Avolio &Yammarino, 2013, p. 176), unlike charismatic leadership. Charismatic leadership and situational leadership are very different. Situational leadership requires the



References: Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (2013). Tranformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead. San Diego, CA: Emerald. Bennis, W. (2007). The challenges of leadership in the modern world: Introduction to the special issue. The American Psychologist, 62(1), 2-5. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/212156443?accountid=458 Kouzes, J. M. (2003). Business Leadership: A Jossey Bass Reader. San Francisco, CA: Wiley Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3), 377-393. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1322-6 Tichy, N. M., & Devanna, M. A. (1990). The tranformational leader. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Wren, J. T. (1995). The leader 's companion: Insights on leadership through the ages. New York: The Free Press. Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fred Maiorino Case

    • 8426 Words
    • 34 Pages

    Conger, J. (1999). Charismatic and transformational leadership in organizations: An insider 's perspective on these developing streams of research. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 145. Retrieved July 24, 2008, from Business Source Complete database.…

    • 8426 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They recognized and celebrated our achievements, fostering a sense of pride and motivation. Through their servant leadership style, they inspire us to strive for excellence, both individually and collectively. Conclusion The concept of the leader as servant challenges traditional notions of leadership, emphasizing the importance of selflessness, empathy, and service. Its compelling elements, such as compassion, active listening, and collaboration, hold immense potential for fostering organizational success and personal growth. Servant leadership is not a fleeting trend; rather, it aligns with the evolving needs of organizations and societies, making it a timeless and invaluable approach to leadership.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA:…

    • 2522 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ldr 711

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (2002). Transformational and charismatic leadership: the road ahead. Amsterdam: JAI.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Three Pillars

    • 1112 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although servant leadership focuses on others and needs of the whole in most cases there could be some shortcomings to servant leadership. According to Lynch and Friedman servant leaders might easily focus more on the needs of the followers than the needs of the organization as a whole or considering the needs of society. It is important that servant leaders have an ethical base while considering the higher values of truth, justice, peace, compassion and human dignity (Lynch & Friedman, 2013). Servant leadership has its base in spiritual leadership in that both put their own needs aside for the greater good and require a following in order to lead. Servant leaders empower others and want at a core for everyone to succeed, as well as the…

    • 1112 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fundamentally, servant leadership entails leaders being servants first. It starts off with a natural feeling that one wants to serve, and goes beyond one’s self interest, where leaders are genuinely concerned about serving their followers. Further, it also involves leaders not using their power to get things done but instead try to persuade and convince their followers. In this way, followers support their leaders and are motivated to become the very best they can become (Dierendonck, 2011). Indeed, servant leaders do care about the development of their employees and even share power.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Northouse, P. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership is said to be one of the most widely researched social influence processes in the behavioral sciences probably because the success of all organizations depends on how effective and efficient their leaders are (Parris & Peachey, 2012). One of the most renowned and studied leadership theories is that of servant leadership. Robert Greenleaf is credited for creating the theory defined as servant leadership that emphasizes the concept that leaders should be servants first to those who are thought to serve them and identifies that organizations are supposed to create people who can build a better tomorrow…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Servant Leadership Ldr-630

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Servant Leadership is where the leader feels the need to take care of the needs of their employees. It has been proven in such organizations such as GE that this method works. Their employees basic needs were taken care of and addressed. This allowed the employees to feel appreciated and they were able to productive at the same time.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Servant-Leadership serves as the dominant leadership practice for this learner. According to the late author, Robert K. Greenleaf, who coined the term Servant-Leadership (McGraw Hill, 2001) believed “the servant-leader is a servant first” (p.65). This philosophy is the practice of serving the organizations or people needs first, and aspires to be leaders. While working as an entrepreneur for 20 years, the learner, DeBorah Thigpen, had to work on both sides of business, follower and leader. She was a follower during her passive moments while listening carefully to the comments of the employees. As a follower Ms. Thigpen became wiser to what operations needed to change within the organization. She would step back into the leadership role when she needed to lead, yet in all aspects of the business, she never truly surrendered the leadership position.…

    • 2555 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wren, J. T. (1995). The Leader 's Companion Insights on Leadership Through the Ages. New York, NY: The Free…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics Paper

    • 2475 Words
    • 10 Pages

    3. Northouse, P.G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and Practice. (4th edition). Western Michigan University, MI: Sage Publications.…

    • 2475 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Men make history and not the other way around. In periods where there is no leadership, society stands still. Progress occurs when courageous, skilful leaders seize the opportunity to change things for the better” - Harry S. Truman…

    • 2690 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nature of servant leadership is fluid, it flows from internal work and dedication. ‘Servant Leaders’ take on responsibility and voluntarily offer assistance throughout their lives. Servant leaders can not be overpowering or demand things from their ‘followers’. They lead from within, they can not lead from above nor can they lead from exterior positions. They need to be integrated, dedicated members of the community they are serving. Leading from within is the only way that servant leadership can flourish without out egotistical corruption. True servant leadership is very rare as it can only be driven by a selfless ability to nurture others.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Contemporary Leadership

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Contemporary leadership plays a very important role in today's rapidly changing nature of organizational environment. Contemporary leadership is designed for managers and leaders who want to become self aware and highly effective leaders in today's environment. There are two theories of contemporary leadership which has the common theme. They view leaders as individuals who inspire followers through their words, ideas and behaviors .These theories are charismatic leadership and transformational leadership. Charismatic leaders articulate an appealing vision which provides a sense of continuity for followers by linking the present with a better future for the organization. The leader then communicates a high performance expectations and express confidence that followers can attain them. This enhances follower self-esteem and self confidence. Next the leader conveys, through words and actions a new set of values and by his or her behavior sets an example for followers to imitate. Finally the charismatic leader makes self-sacrifices and engages in unconventional behavior to demonstrate courage and convictions about the vision of the organization. On the other hand transformational leaders are those who inspire followers to transcend their own self-interests and who are capable of having a profound and extraordinary effect on followers. These leaders pays attention to the concerns and developmental needs of individual followers, they change followers' awareness of issues by helping them to look at old problems in new ways; and they are able to excite, arouse and inspire followers to put out extra effort to achieve the goals of organization. Organizations are increasingly searching for managers who can exhibit transformational leadership qualities. They want leaders with visions and charisma to carry out those visions so that the organization can achieve its goals in today's global competitive world.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays