Compare And Contrast Reading Lolita In Tehran And Persepolis

When someone says rebellion, what comes to mind? Do a book or an Arthur comes to mind? We will use resources and techniques we can find to figure out this. Using the resources “Cairo: my city, my revolution”, “Reading Lolita in Tehran”, and “Persepolis 2”. I’m going to inform you on how the authors explain. First, how the idea of the rebellion was treated by the Arthur? “the river is a still, steely grey, a dull pewter” stated in the text from Cairo: my city, my revolution. We can draw breath, even though the breath burns. And we can still open our eyes to see an opaque stated in the text. It’s difficult to see the world when the government and society will not help the city, country, etc. this is what the idea of the rebellion was treated by the Arthur Ahdaf Soueif.
Stated in the text Reading Lolita in Tehran how can I create another world outside the room? The world is so cold. Back then the rebellion was segregated such as seats, water fountains, and schools. Blacks weren’t allowed to even step foot in the front of the bus because it was for whites only. They had to enter through the back entrance which led them to where they could sit in the back of the bus stated in the text Reading Lolita in Tehran. In taxis, which only accepted five passengers or less! men and women had to squeeze together like sardines to get to where they were going. That show you the rebellion made the world cruel. This is what the idea of the rebellion was treated by Arthur Azar