Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Compare and Contrast of the effects of imperialism of the west on Africa and India

Good Essays
1262 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast of the effects of imperialism of the west on Africa and India
Jules Ferry once said "In order for a country to be great, she must show her influence throughout the world and carry everywhere she can her language, her customs, her flag, her arms, and her genius." This quote is the perfect example of the views of an imperialist nation. From 1750-1914 Western civilizations dominated the world by enforcing their culture and systems upon weaker nations. Regions such as Africa, the Middle East, India, and Africa were severely impacted positively and negatively by the imperialism of the west. Two of those cultures that were affected in a very similar way during this time period by the effects of imperialism were Africa and India. In both places wars and violence occurred but new technologies were brought by the west that helped improved the civilizations. However Africa and India responded differently to the way the west imposed there economic, social and political ways upon the people.

From 1870 to 1890 a very important event occurred known as the "Scramble for Africa". European powers attempted to acquire as much African territory as they could get there hands on. Men such as King Leopold the Second of Belgium singed treaties with local chiefs that granted them personal control over the land. He exploited the Africans living in the Congo River valley for there labor. He forced them to collect sap from rubber plants as well as other back breaking work. The people were over taxed and abused. This operation benefited the Belgium economy greatly but added nothing but poverty to the African economy. In 1884 the German Chancellor Bismarck organized the Berlin Conference in order to divide up Africa in a civilized matter between Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Portugal, and Italy. Some of the positive effects of this western imperialism were the new technologies such as medicine and nutrition that were brought to Africa. This increased life-span and resulted in a population expansion. Transportation and communication techniques were introduced including railroads, telephones, and telegraphs. Some Africans received proper education and later on were exposed to greater economic opportunities. The army even accepted some African as administrators or soldiers in the army. The negative effects were quite substantial though. At the Berlin conference, the representatives gave no thought into what tribes, ethnic, and cultural barriers they were interfering with. This caused many conflicts between populations in Africa. Socially the natives were treated subordinately to the Europeans. They were forced to participate in back breaking labor for very little pay. The domination of the west ate away at the values and traditions that Africans had once held so precious. Relationships were broken between tribes and cultures. One example of the violence that went on during this time was the dispute over South Africa. The Boers, Zulu, and British all clashed over the land and abundant resources found in Southern Africa. The British adopted a Forward Policy in the region that would hopefully bring the various British colonies, Boer republics and independent African groups under control. At the Battle at Isandlwana over 1300 British troops were killed. A new policy of divide and rule led to a decade of destructive civil war. The Boers were Dutch farmers living in South Africa who attempted to push the British north but instead found themselves fighting with the native Zulu people. The discovery of diamonds and gold brought more and more foreigners into the region. The people tried to start a rebellion against the Boers but it was unsuccessful. The Boer War was fought in 1899 but in the end the British came out victorious and united their South African land into the Union of South Africa.

By 1857 Britain had a great deal of control of the subcontinent of India. It was run by the British East India Company which was only interested in profits and ignored the culture and needs of the Indian natives. The British trained an army of Indian soldiers known as the sepoys. They organized a revolt because they had to bite off bullet cartridges that were greased with pork or beef fat. Most of the soldiers were Muslim or Hindu and these animal fats were against their religion. The sepoys rose up against the officers and the violence spread quickly to cities in northern and central India. Due to this revolt the British government took control over India and brought an end to the East India Company's rule. The government then divided India into provinces and then districts. Politically the British provided a single system of law and government that unified India. They opened up the job market and gave more people the opportunity to get an education. English became the official language in an effort to unify the culture. Despite all these positives, England ruled by fear. In order to let the people know how powerful they were, they would strap criminals and rebels to cannons. They passed laws without taking the natives needs into consideration. Economically the British built roads, bridges, railroads and set up telegraph wires. British manufactured goods but a damper on India's cottage industries where people produced goods in their own homes. Money lenders became popular so people could pay their taxes. Socially Indians were looked down upon by the British. There culture was looked at as inferior to the West. Soldiers were not able to move up in rank and laborers were forced to work long hours in horrible conditions. The British banned such practices as Sati in which a women thrown herself into the burning ashes of her husband. This was a very sacred ritual to some and those people felt that their culture was being infringed upon. Many people in India embraced the new opportunities that Britain provided them with. They prospered and pursued respectable occupations. Others were outraged at the exploitation of the Indian culture.

The major difference between Western Imperialism in India and Africa is that in Africa more than two groups were fighting for the land. Native tribes as well as several western powers were all trying to gain as much land as possible. In India the only competition was between Britain and the Indian people. This caused fewer problems. A major similarity is that Westernization brought along with it new technologies that allowed these regions to prosper. New medicines, transportation, and communication techniques were huge benefits to Africa and India. In both regions, the ruling powers split up the territory without thinking about the boundaries that the native people had set up. This caused a lot of anguish between the people and resulted in many social problems. A common trend in imperialism is that the colony works to benefit the mother country. European nations prospered greatly off the resources and products being produced in Africa and India but yet the native people struggled to pay ever increasing taxes. Wars and rebellions broke out in both regions due to unfair guidelines set by the ruling countries. The inhabitants of Africa and India were looked down at as being inferior people and having an inferior culture.

The imperialism that occurred in Africa and India in the 1800's was much more similar then different. Both suffered injustices but enjoyed the new technologies and governmental systems that the west brought with them. The West believes that it was there duty to spread their "glorious" culture to those who were less fortunate then those. That idea had good intentions but when the countries started to loose sight of that and become greedy and inconsiderate major problems started to occur. They had no regard that the land they were changing was not their own.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    GKE1 task 3

    • 808 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A. The rise of new imperialism of the 19th and early 20th century involved Europe going into Africa. The causes of imperialism in Africa were partly due to the decolonization in America. The European powers were out political and economic gain by the United States gaining their independence. In 1876 European powers especially King Leopold II of Belgium, agreed in the Berlin Conference to split up the land in Africa, no longer invading to colonize but to gain political, military and economic power. The methods to imperialism of the African land were done differently, by each European power. The British who imperialized the cape of Africa used laws and indirect methods to gain power, however King Leopold II used extreme force to gain control of the Congo. The Congo was then ruled with strict political control and military force.…

    • 808 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Misrepresentation of Africa The 19th century was one of the most important time periods that helped shape the world into what it is today. Western European powers, such as Great Britain, Germany, and France, strongly believed in the notion that in order to gain more dominant global power, they would have to conquer new lands across the globe and exploit the territories’ resources. Throughout the early and mid 1800s, the nations of Western Europe upheld imperialism, conquering and exploiting foreign lands in Asia and South America. Unfortunately, one major problem remained in the way of global imperialism; Africa, a continent rich in resources, could not be infiltrated because of strong resistance by the natives, foreign disease, and difficult terrain. Nevertheless, in the 1880s, Western Europe became more advanced and had the capability of conquering Africa; the scramble for Africa was on. In 1884-85, the Berlin Conference was held in Germany; this was a diplomatic meeting where the nations of Western Europe divided Africa among themselves. Each nation was given separate holdings in Africa, and the issue of land in Africa was solved. However, a major problem overlooked by the Europeans was that Africa had no say in the Berlin Conference. This resulted in many problems that would terrorize Africa for years to come; because Africans had no say in the dividing of their land, religious and political strife arose, and places such as the Congo faced detrimental and uninvited changes.…

    • 893 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism Dbq

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mikhael Rahme 1/11/13 Global History 10 Per. 1 Throughout history, countless countries have wanted to be on top. Whether culturally superior, or monetarily superior, or even having an extensive empire, every country wants most or all of these in their arsenal of advantages. Countries who strive to be the cream of the crop tend to turn towards imperialism. Imperialism, being the domination of cultural, economic, or political life of another country, is a very attractive course to take for the forming imperialist power. While some may argue that the controlling power could aid the development and prosperity of both the controlled country and itself, it may, in some cases, be detrimental to the controlled country. Many European powers and Japan during the late 1800s to the early 1900s became imperialistic nations to seize control of developing African Nations, India, and Asian countries and territories, and not all of these nations were agreeable about foreign control.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Africa was imperialized in 1884 at the conference of Berlin. By 1914, Europeans had taken most of Africa. Countries in Africa before imperialism where socially strong because they had a lot of different tribes, cultures and languages. However different ethnic groups were often in conflict. Economically they had complex trade. European countries imperialized Africa because they wanted to spread Christianity and abolish slavery. They also wanted their natural resources. They took advantage of Africa’s conflicts and took over with the cooperation of local leaders and their advanced weapons. The effects of European imperialism were socially negative because the British tried to enforce their beliefs and way of living on Africans by changing their…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    European Nations wanted more land, power, and natural resources. They got this by conquering and colonizing new lands. Africa was not colonized, making the continent a prime area for colonization. Prior to the 19th century European nations only used Africa for its slave trade, therefore, only settling on the coasts. The driving forces behind these European conquests in Africa were caused by political, cultural, and economic reasons.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Africa Imperialism DBQ

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Between 1880 and 1914, Africa was a great place to acquire colonies if necessary. Almost everyone in Europe was very supportive of this movement. Prince Leopold of Belgium was for this movement because he said that colonies are very useful in that they help the mother country gain wealth, natural resources, and power. (Doc. 1) He also believes that it is a great way to prove to everyone that Belgians are imperial people capable of dominating and enlightening others. Since Prince Leopold was heir to the Belgium throne, he wanted to make sure that his country had the most money and power it could get. Another European who loved the acquisition of African Colonies was Joseph Chamberlain. (Doc. 4) He believed that without the use of colonies, a country couldn’t survive. He believes that the mother country is highly dependent on its colonies raw materials and natural resources and without them half the population would starve. Another proponent to the acquisition of Africa was George Washington Williams of Belgium. (Doc. 6) He believes that not only is it good that they are acquiring land and wealth, but it is very easy to do so.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conference of Berlin: Regulated trade and colonization in Africa. It formalized the scramble to gain colonies in Africa and set up boundaries for each country’s colonies.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Early History Mali is a country located in West Africa. Before Europeans arrived, there were 3 major civilizations in Mali. These Great African civilizations grew and prospered while most of the European continent was still in the dark ages. The Kingdom of Ghana was the first, the Mali Empire was the second, and the Songhai Empire was the third.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cause of Scramble for Africa: There were several factors which The Berlin Conference was in 1884-1885, marked the start of the European competition for territory in Africa, it was called the scramble for africa. In meetings, Great Britain, France, Germany, Portugal, and King Leopold II divided their claims to African territory. During the conference the leaders also agreed to allow free trade among the colonies and made a system for negotiating future European claims in Africa. They did not provided any say for the peoples of Africa over the partitioning of their homelands.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1800s and early 1900s, a wave of imperialism swept over Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. The Western nations, pursuing new raw materials, established control, and became very powerful. The non-Western world obtained many benefits, such as industrialization and public education. While imperialism proved beneficial, it also resulted in warfare, racism, economic discrimination, and slavery. Both India and sub-Saharan Africa were affected by European imperialism. Between 1750 and 1914, European imperialism in India and sub-Saharan Africa created a similar effect of poor treatment of natives, such as a decrease in jobs and economic instability. In contrast, India was influenced mainly by Britain, whereas multiple European countries, including Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Belgium, and Portugal, were involved with sub-Saharan Africa.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three decades following the Berlin conference were chaotic as European powers competed to occupy and colonize Africa. Europe would be profiting off the resources that they collected from their reaction to far much weaker subordinate African colonies. As Europe’s wealth amassed, Africa’s wealth approached its end. It was soon Eu European intruders as a much stronger force than themselves and lost all their ties to older tradition through fear. In 1886, the British government commissioned and administered the development of the which was signed by many African rulers (doc.1). These Africans gave in but the document does not specify if they gave in because they lost sights of the nation they were once before. Another document of the reason…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imperialistic Africa

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the 19th century of the Industrial Age, many European nations (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Britain) sought for a source for raw material and a market for manufactured goods in Africa. This economic motivation helped drive the Scramble for Africa. The Scramble for Africa [1885-1910] was when many European nations competed for colonies in Africa. To take control of these regions, the European powers came up with the Treaty of Berlin. This stated that they would not sell firearms to Africa; which resulted in Europeans having a monopoly on guns in Africa. However, although it stated that they would not sell firearms to Africa making it easier to take it over, it also stated that they would suppress slavery. During the Scramble for Africa, or the imperialism imposed in Africa, there were great contributions that ultimately modernized Africa, as well as, bad influences, such as the carving of Africa without the influence of the traditional tribal boundaries, causing tribalism and civil wars.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AP World History Comparative Essay Aieshah Abdeljawad 5th 2/14/11 During the period of 1750-1914, Western intervention was a common thing as European states began to believe that imperial expansion and colonial domination were crucial for the survival of their states and societies as well as their personal fortunes. India and Africa were colonized so quickly for their resources and out of competition that other European states would colonize them first. Both India and Africa had violent reactions to European colonization but the effect was different between the two. For India, the colonization, though had a very violent rebellion, linked India into the global economy and provided better communication throughout the whole state. For…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Niumi was specifically colonized to export and trade its raw materials, such as copper, cotton, rubber, palm oil, cocoa, diamonds, tea, and tin. The increase in trade also brought about an industrial revolution. Because of the Industrial Revolution, it increased the areas' capital and brought developments to the area to accommodate the rise in population. However, with the greater need to mine and harvest more raw materials also came the greater need to have workers, leading to the natives of the area being exploited as cheap laborers Hence, the New Imperialism age affected economic changes in Niumi, as well as other parts of Africa by creating more wealth, but it also created an unequal distribution of that wealth. African citizens began to…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Essay

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DBQ ESSSAY The Berlin Conference of 1986-1985 was Africa's undoing in many ways. During the conference, European Nations decided which lands in Africa they would take over. However, this was done without the presence of an African representative. The race of these European powers to colonize and occupy Africa is termed, the “Scramble for Africa”. Africa’s inhabitants responded with anger and violence as is shown in the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth document. On the other hand, some tried to come to an agreement or to keep peace with the Europeans, which is seen in the second and third document; and the first document shows the Europeans attempted to gain control without conflict. Due to the Africans lack of modern weapons, they were often defeated.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays