Compare And Contrast Darwin's Theory Of Natural Selection
Decisions are always hard choices we have to make. Even during this election session there are only two candidates but we have such hard decision to make. Two parties but millions of different views, thoughts and action. But as we were growing up we were taught that all humans are same, and carry the same flesh and blood. So, why do two people have millions of differences? Why everyone is so same in structure but so different on habits? Why do people born on the same day and same condition can grow up suffering from different diseases? The answer is with our ancestors and the origination of our life. We all have the same origin but we all carry different genes. One of the early learners of the history of origin of all the organisms is a well-known
…show more content…
This world (Earth) we live on today have thousands of species (flora, fauna and organisms) of all different features, family and history of growth and survival. The theory of natural selection introduces the theory of survival of the fittest flora and fauna, where one survives only if it is fit for the nature. The theory of natural selection in easy terms is that the one who fits is the one who stays. Darwin says the one that fights against and with the nature for its survival is the one that are still present …show more content…
He says that the organisms do not change from one species to another through constant changing in organs or through development of new legs and grills, but actually it’s due to certain continuous action that makes the organism what it is today. He describes this change in character has theory of “inheritance of acquired characteristics.” (Lamarck) In his book, Lamarck explains further, “It is not the organs—that is, the character and form of the animal's bodily parts—that have given rise to its habits and particular structures. It is the habits and manner of life and the conditions in which its ancestors lived that have in the course of time fashioned its bodily form, its organs and qualities.” (Lamarck) Thus, the anti-Darwinism suggests that the theory of natural selection is not fully competent. There are new reproductive variations in genes occurring in different organisms, which is not explained by Darwin’s
This world (Earth) we live on today have thousands of species (flora, fauna and organisms) of all different features, family and history of growth and survival. The theory of natural selection introduces the theory of survival of the fittest flora and fauna, where one survives only if it is fit for the nature. The theory of natural selection in easy terms is that the one who fits is the one who stays. Darwin says the one that fights against and with the nature for its survival is the one that are still present …show more content…
He says that the organisms do not change from one species to another through constant changing in organs or through development of new legs and grills, but actually it’s due to certain continuous action that makes the organism what it is today. He describes this change in character has theory of “inheritance of acquired characteristics.” (Lamarck) In his book, Lamarck explains further, “It is not the organs—that is, the character and form of the animal's bodily parts—that have given rise to its habits and particular structures. It is the habits and manner of life and the conditions in which its ancestors lived that have in the course of time fashioned its bodily form, its organs and qualities.” (Lamarck) Thus, the anti-Darwinism suggests that the theory of natural selection is not fully competent. There are new reproductive variations in genes occurring in different organisms, which is not explained by Darwin’s