Comparative essay of property ownership
Property ownership is described to be the solid exemplification of dominance, for a lack of better word, an individual imprint to whatever the object the owner may possess. “My Wood” written by E.M. Forester and “Who Owns the Mountains” written by Henry Van Dyke, both deals with complex idea within the context of property ownership. The idea of responsibility is definitely present in the writing discussed by Forester. For Henry Van Dyke, he pertains to the idea that acquiring an ownership to an object is not fully worth the commitment if one does not recognize and appreciate the beauty and the reasons for its existence. Furthermore, although E.M. Forester and Henry Van Dyke display a unique and different approach to the fundamental ideas behind the property ownership, the two writers’ intention is nearly identical. Whatever one has ownership to, it is going to have an effect on us one way or another.
Of all the things that exist in our world, will we truly be able to obtain a “true” ownership to any of them? In “My Wood”, Forester implies that with property ownership, there comes a great burden of responsibility, or referred to as a “heavy” feeling. Because of this burden that might arouse an issue, he suggests that we should think twice before committing to an ownership to a certain item. “If you have a lot of things you cannot move about a lot, that furniture requires dusting, dusters require servants, servants require insurance stamps, and the whole tangle makes you think twice before you accept an invitation to dinner or go for a bathe in the Jordan.” Forester utilizes Biblical allusions to reveal his attitude of owning a land. Something that might seem simple in this case, contain numerous chain of events. However, his example imposes some problems involving fallacies, in this case known as a slippery slope. He is assuming that one decision to own an item will lead to inconclusive cause and effects. Forester...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document