Preview

Company Law

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1392 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Company Law
Introduction
The issues in the case of ‘Hawthorn Blood Supplies Co Ltd’, which is a listed company on Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), are concerned protection of shareholder’s and creditor’s interests. We will identify possible legal issues in the relation to the Corporation Act 2001 and discuss whether they have been any breaches of relevant common law rules and statutory provisions in relation to ‘capital maintenance’, ‘share buy-backs’, financial assistance’ and ‘payment of dividends’. We will also briefly discuss ‘particular relevance of section 588G’ in relation to Roger.

Doctrine of Capital Maintenance
Companies limited by shares must comply with legal procedures, when undertaking certain transactions affecting its share capital (Ciro 2009)
They are: * Reduction of capital; * Companies acquiring or controlling their own shares; and * Companies giving financial assistance for the purchase of their own shares.
The transactions listed above are regulated by Ch 2j of the Corporations Act. The broad purpose of Ch 2j is to ensure that the interests of creditors and shareholders are protected when companies undertake these transactions. (Ciro 2009)
Doctrine of capital maintenance was originally established by the general Law. It assumes, that once a corporation has acquired capital from issuing of its shares then, in the interests of shareholders and creditors, and making allowance for normal fluctuations in normal commercial performance, the corporation should seek to maintain that capital. The case that is usually referred to as authority to this principle is Trevor v Whitworth (1887)
The rule in Trevor v Whitworth (1887) is that, a company limited by shares must maintain its share capital, therefore is prohibited from buying own shares.
The strict application of the doctrine of capital maintenance has been gradually modified by reforms to the Corporations Act. Chapter 2J permits a company to engage in share buy-backs and reduction of



References: Ciro, T & Symes, C 2009, Corporation Law in Principle,8th edn, Lawbook Co, Thompson Reuters, Australia http://books.google.com.au/books?id=zFSgs52KSmoC&pg

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study guide ibus

    • 29919 Words
    • 120 Pages

    11. Companies must always use the equity method when they hold between 25% and 50% of the common…

    • 29919 Words
    • 120 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LOBOFinal Exam 2

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2 This is an OPEN book examination. You can only use your prescribed text book and the Corporations Act 2001. No other materials are allowed.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Lord Justice Lindley, “By a company is meant association of many person who contribute money or money’s worth to a common stock and employ it for a common purpose. The common stock so contributed is denoted in money and is the capital of the company. The persons who contribute it or to whom it belongs are members. The proportion of capital to which each member is entitled is his share.” (Mitra & Sen, 1956, p. 554)…

    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Law Case Summary

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Corporation Act 2001 (Cth) as well as the Turquand rule of internal management in common…

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jason Harris, Anil Hargovan and Michael Adams, Australian Corporate Law (LexisNexis, 4th ed, 2013) Chapters 15, 16…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    |company could effect the share holders capital. This proposal was sent to AIG but never made the ballot and was never voted upon. Similar |…

    • 2240 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study: Hollis V Vabu

    • 2064 Words
    • 9 Pages

    o Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd v Producers and Citizens Co-operative Assurance Co. of Australia Ltd (1919) 26 CLR 110…

    • 2064 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cs date sheet

    • 344 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Due Diligence and Corporate Compliance Management (Module-IV) Company Accounts and Auditing Practices (Module-II) Capital Markets and Securities Laws (Module-II) NO EXAMINATION and and and Strategic Management, Alliances and International Trade (Module-III) Secretarial Audit, Compliance Management and Due Diligence (Module – I)…

    • 344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper will seek to identify any breaches of Common Law, Equitable principles, sections 180-184 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), and any other breaches of the aforementioned Act specifically dealing with Takeovers, whilst describing any appropriate remedies that may be available for said breaches.…

    • 3164 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Northern Rock Plc

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to the UK Corporate governance code the board should set up formal and obvious arrangements bearing in mind how to apply the corporate reporting internal control, and risk management rules for keeping the right relationship with the company`s auditors.…

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zara Case Study

    • 6040 Words
    • 25 Pages

    as opposing Shareholders rights to obtain fair revenue for their investment. In this paper, we argue…

    • 6040 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Facts: Mick, Keith, Charlie, Bill and Brian were directors and equal shareholder of Big Lips Music Pty Ltd. Brian resigned his directorship as a result of differences with Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie. The others wanted to get rid of Brian as a shareholder. However, Brian told them that he would never sell his shares in Big Lips Music. A general meeting of Big Lips Music’s shareholders is called at which there is a motion to insert a new clause in the company’s constitution that gives Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie the right to compulsorily acquire Brian’s shares for their issue price. What is the process for inserting a new clause in the company’s constitution? Can Brian prevent the new clause being inserted even thought the others shareholders passed a special resolution that that effect? Required:  Student 1 ‐ Advise the other shareholders of Big Lips Music (the Plaintiffs) what is the process for inserting this new clause in the company’s constitution. If they insert this new clause can they acquire Brian’s shares for the issue price?  Student 2 ‐ Advise Brian (the Defendant) whether he can prevent the new clause being inserted by the other shareholders and if so how? If he can not prevent it will he have to sell his shares for their issue price? Parties The Majority  Mick – Director and shareholder  Keith – Director and shareholder  Charlie – Director and shareholder  Bill – Director and shareholder The Minority  Brian – Shareholder Issues…

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ciro T, Symes C, Corporations Law in Principle LBC Thomson Reuters, Sydney, 8th edition 2009…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prudential Regulations

    • 25889 Words
    • 104 Pages

    CONTENTS PART-A PART-B Definitions. Regulations. RISK MANAGEMENT (R) Regulation R-1 Regulation R-2 Regulation R-3 Regulation R-4 Limit on exposure to a single person. Limit on exposure against contingent liabilities. Minimum conditions for taking exposure. Limit on exposure against unsecured financing facilities. Linkage between financial indicators of the borrower and total exposure from financial institutions. Exposure against shares/TFCs and acquisition of shares. Guarantees. Classification and provisioning for assets. Assuming obligations on behalf of NBFCs. Facilities to private limited company. Payment of dividend. Monitoring. Margin requirements. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (G) Regulation G-1 Corporate governance/board of Directors & management. Dealing with directors, major shareholders & employees of…

    • 25889 Words
    • 104 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Questions

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain the concept of capital maintenance. Is adjusting for changes in the value of monetary and non-monetary assets consistent with the capital maintenance concept?…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays