Preview

“Common Good: the Law’s End”

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2790 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“Common Good: the Law’s End”
“COMMON GOOD: The Law’s End”
(A Commentary on Summa Theologica Question 90, Article 2)

I. INTRODUCTION

“Et ideo omnis lex ad bonum commune ordinatur (Therefore every law is ordained to the common good).” This is the second component on the definition of law by St. Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica. For him, law “is nothing else than an ordinance of reason for the common good, made by him who has care of the community, and promulgated.” In this definition of St. Thomas, he provides four main elements of the law namely: an ordinance of reason, for the common good, made by the legislator, and promulgated. He distributes each one of these factors into four articles with the main heading of the essence of law. In this commentary, I just want to focus on the second component which is the end-point of the law: the common good. I divide my work into three main parts in congruence with the style of St. Thomas Aquinas. The first part of this paper deals with the exposition of the main contention of St. Thomas with regards to the common good. This includes some of the objections that are in disagreement to the main argument of St. Thomas with regards to the common good. The second part, then, speaks of the main thoughts of St. Thomas on the concept of the common good as the end-point of law. This is subdivided into two main points. First is the relationship between the law and the human acts. Second is the relationship between the law and the common good. The third part of this commentary is the exposition and analysis of the responses of St. Thomas to the different objections raised around the concept of the common good. II.) THE COMMON GOOD AS THE END OF LAW

A.) The Main Thesis and Its Objections

In order to understand better the thoughts of St. Thomas, it is helpful to begin with the basic structure of his literary style in developing a topic for discussion. Generally, throughout his whole work of Summa Theologica, he has consistent



Bibliography: 1.) Primary Source: ST. THOMAS AQUINAS, Summa Theologica, Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New York 1966. 2.) Secondary Sources: FARRELL, W., A Companion to Summa (volume II), Sheed and Ward, London 1938. FERNANDEZ-LARGO, A.O., “Tratado de la Ley en General,” en Santo Tomas de Aquino, Suma Teologia, BAC, Madrid 1994. KEMPSHALL, M.S., The Common Good in Late Medieval Political Thought, Oxford University Press Inc., New York 1999.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Aquinas's political and legal theory is important for three reasons. First, it reasserts the value of politics by drawing on Aristotle to argue that politics and political life are morally positive activities that are in accordance with the intention of God for man. Second, it combines traditional hierarchical and feudal views of the structure of society and politics with emerging community-oriented and incipiently egalitarian views of the proper ordering of society. Third, it develops an integrated and logically coherent theory of natural law that continues to be an important source of legal, political, and moral norms.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Economics Quiz

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Which of the following is not an example of St. Thomas Aquinas’ requirements for a law to be just?…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The notion of the common good, as MacIntyre (1998) understands it, differs fundamentally from the notions in which the good of a community is logically constructed posterior to the goods of its members. To be more specific, MacIntyre (1998: 240) fiercely criticizes the concepts of the common good in which the good of the whole can "be arrived at by summing the goods of the parts" or by attaining public goods. Certainly, says MacIntyre (1998:239-240), it is a mistake to think that the practice of the common good "is no more than the summing of the goods pursued by individuals as members" of a particular community. Community, MacIntyre emphasizes, is not merely an instrument employed by individuals to attain their own goods. Otherwise, members'…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his ``Rhetoric of Justice'', Aristotle differentiates between two kinds of law: the particular and the universal. The first, he says, is that which an individual community lays down for itself. The second, the universal law, is what Aristotle refers to as ``a natural and universal notion of right and wrong''. Lewis's novel portrays a community which have instituted the first type of law, but there is no adequate sense of community justice being precise and universally correct. Furthermore, Lewis highlights the nature of Artigues' oblivious justice system which innocently supposes man's law to be inextricable from God's will. Though the nature of the social and legal structure ensure the survival and prosperity of Artigues, to the detriment of…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Natural Law is a deontological theory of ethics. According to Thomas Aquinas it is absolutist and depends on the idea that God created everything with a purpose and supreme good is found when that purpose is fulfilled. For Aristotle, who heavily influenced Aquinas’ ideas, he believed that supreme good for humans is happiness. Thomas Aquinas agreed with Aristotle, but saw a human’s supreme purpose to be perfection.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 6 Assignment

    • 834 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Source: Fuller, L. (1975). The morality of law. (p. 159). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.…

    • 834 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay aims to argue the views of two different theorist, Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant, with regards to their views on moral worth of an action. The idea of good and bad creates heated debates among many, but this essay will successfully unravel the layers of Bentham’s theory of Utilitarianism and his belief that all our motives are driven by pleasure and pain. While arguing Kant’s opposing argument that moral worth of an act revolves around democratic attitudes, and that moral truths are founded on reasons that is logical to all people. When one breaks down both theories, it occurs that Kant’s theory comes out to be the more sensible one in numerous aspects.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates vs Thrasymachus

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Any argument relies upon some fundamental agreement about the issue being discussed. However great the divide in opinion may be, there must exist at least some similarity in the participants’ manner of viewing the issue if a solution is ever to be reached. Book One of Plato’s Republic features a disagreement between Socrates and Thrasymachus about the nature of justice. The disaccord between their views of the subject is extremely pronounced, but there are certain underlying agreements which guide the course of the debate. One way to evaluate the validity of the arguments involved is to examine whether the assumptions at the root of the argument are in accord with this common ground. By my reading of the dialogue, Socrates’ reply to the first part of Thrasymachus’ definition of justice rests safely upon this common ground, whereas his answer to Thrasymachus’ second definition moves away from this mutually acceptable base, and is injured as a result. In exploring this topic, I intend to examine briefly Thrasymachus’ two-part definition of justice. For each of these parts I will evaluate one Socratic response and discuss it from the perspective of the “craftsman analogy” – an analogy which is initially used by common consent, but which Socrates adapts until its original usage almost disappears.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is my objective in this paper, to illustrate the claims made by Thrasymachus, in The Republic, as argument to Socrates' views on what justice is. I will then evaluate the claims, "justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger" (338c), and that "a just man always gets less than an unjust one" (343d), in an effort to see how Thrasymachus uses these statements to provoke an argument. Despite the contradictory nature of these statements, I will attempt to show, through the analyzing of Thrasymachus' speech, that they are actually related. Thrasymachus uses these statements to create an overall picture of his idea of justice to the people in an effort to get Socrates to retract his statements on what justice is. After analyzing these arguments, I will deduce that Thrasymachus' argument is not plausible.…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Republic written by Plato, Glaucon presented an argument concerning “the nature and origin of justice”. This argument has caused many beliefs and interpretations from Glaucon about justice. Glaucon presents his arguments by stating the four premises and what each one of them mean. His first premise is “It is by nature good to harm”. This premise is broken up into different meanings by nature, being referred to character individuality, good being referred to an enjoyable experience and harm as a physical or mental injury. This premise shows how being harmed can be beneficial or a good repercussion, through different experiences in life. Overall, the conclusion of this premise shows how justice plays a typical role in society to prohibit people in doing unjust deeds and disrupting the structure of society.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hist Final

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Since the Enlightenment, the three-fold quest for the meaning of life, for a just society, and for truth itself has become increasingly contentious. This quest is now our own, and if we are to embrace its promise, we must first confront its difficulties. Once again, I would like you to enter into the arguments surrounding the great issues that we face by comparing the ideas of some of the prominent figures we have studied. To do this, please write a brief essay of two to three pages about one of the topics below. Remember to answer both sets of questions for the one topic you have chosen.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As well as being an ineffective money raising scheme, the lottery is also a regressive form of taxation. The…

    • 638 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Explain Natural Law Theory

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is important to highlight that Natural Laws differ from acts which occur naturally. There are many aspects to Natural Law, the first being the concept that it is absolute; therefore it includes set rules to follow. Thomas Aquinas believed that these rules were the primary precepts, along with the secondary precepts, which are obtained from natural morality within humans. Natural Law is also seen as absolute for atheists, as they believe, through the ability to reason, humans can determine the most ethical thing to do. The second aspect of Natural Law is that it is considered deontological; therefore it focuses on the intent behind an action, rather than the final outcome. Although Natural Law’ has a deontological focus, it also involves aspects that are teleological, because one of the main concepts behind Natural Law theory, argues that everything has an end purpose to be fulfilled.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are Dreams Meaningful

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bibliography: Aquinas,Saint Thomas. Aquinas 's Shorter Summa: Saint Thomas 's Own Concise Version of His Summa Theologica. Manchester: Sophia Institute Press, 2001.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although Aristotle did not use the term ‘natural law’ many medieval philosophers considered him as one of the first exponents of the fundamentals of natural law. Stoic philosophy was the first to introduce the term ‘natural law’ with the Stoics emphasising nature and the moral requirement to accept and conform to what is given in nature. This Greek philosophy spanned several centuries and greatly influenced the Roman philosopher Cicero. Cicero (d. 43BC) was a strong advocate of natural law and spoke of natural law as the innate power of reason to direct action. Catholic natural law theory was formulated by St. Thomas Aquinas over seven centuries ago. He identified one fundamental norm of natural law: do good and avoid evil. Doing good in this context is following reason’s lead to actualise human…

    • 2320 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays